TransFAIR研究:欧洲多中心实验比较EHR2EDC技术与eCRF数据收集的通常手工方法。

IF 4.1 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nadir Ammour, Nicolas Griffon, Juliette Djadi-Prat, Gilles Chatellier, Martine Lewi, Marija Todorovic, Augustín Gómez de la Cámara, Maria Teresa García Morales, Sara Testoni, Oriana Nanni, Christoph Schindler, Mats Sundgren, Almenia Garvey, Tomothy Victor, Manon Cariou, Christel Daniel
{"title":"TransFAIR研究:欧洲多中心实验比较EHR2EDC技术与eCRF数据收集的通常手工方法。","authors":"Nadir Ammour,&nbsp;Nicolas Griffon,&nbsp;Juliette Djadi-Prat,&nbsp;Gilles Chatellier,&nbsp;Martine Lewi,&nbsp;Marija Todorovic,&nbsp;Augustín Gómez de la Cámara,&nbsp;Maria Teresa García Morales,&nbsp;Sara Testoni,&nbsp;Oriana Nanni,&nbsp;Christoph Schindler,&nbsp;Mats Sundgren,&nbsp;Almenia Garvey,&nbsp;Tomothy Victor,&nbsp;Manon Cariou,&nbsp;Christel Daniel","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Regulatory authorities including the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency are encouraging to conduct clinical trials using routinely collected data. The aim of the TransFAIR experimental comparison was to evaluate, within real-life conditions, the ability of the Electronic Health Records to Electronic Data Capture (EHR2EDC) module to accurately transfer from EHRs to EDC systems patients' data of clinical studies in various therapeutic areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study including six clinical trials from three different sponsors running in three hospitals across Europe has been conducted. The same data from the six studies were collected using both traditional manual data entry and the EHR2EDC module. The outcome variable was the percentage of data accurately transferred using the EHR2EDC technology. This percentage was calculated considering all collected data and the data in four domains: demographics (DM), vital signs (VS), laboratories (LB) and concomitant medications (CM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 6143 data points (39.6% of the data in the scope of the TransFAIR study and 16.9% when considering all data) were accurately transferred using the platform. LB data represented 65.4% of the data transferred; VS data, 30.8%; DM data, 0.7% and CM data, 3.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The objective of accurately transferring at least 15% of the manually entered trial datapoints using the EHR2EDC module was achieved. Collaboration and codesign by hospitals, industry, technology company, supported by the Institute of Innovation through Health Data was a success factor in accomplishing these results. Further work should focus on the harmonisation of data standards and improved interoperability to extend the scope of transferable EHR data.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277109/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TransFAIR study: a European multicentre experimental comparison of EHR2EDC technology to the usual manual method for eCRF data collection.\",\"authors\":\"Nadir Ammour,&nbsp;Nicolas Griffon,&nbsp;Juliette Djadi-Prat,&nbsp;Gilles Chatellier,&nbsp;Martine Lewi,&nbsp;Marija Todorovic,&nbsp;Augustín Gómez de la Cámara,&nbsp;Maria Teresa García Morales,&nbsp;Sara Testoni,&nbsp;Oriana Nanni,&nbsp;Christoph Schindler,&nbsp;Mats Sundgren,&nbsp;Almenia Garvey,&nbsp;Tomothy Victor,&nbsp;Manon Cariou,&nbsp;Christel Daniel\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Regulatory authorities including the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency are encouraging to conduct clinical trials using routinely collected data. The aim of the TransFAIR experimental comparison was to evaluate, within real-life conditions, the ability of the Electronic Health Records to Electronic Data Capture (EHR2EDC) module to accurately transfer from EHRs to EDC systems patients' data of clinical studies in various therapeutic areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study including six clinical trials from three different sponsors running in three hospitals across Europe has been conducted. The same data from the six studies were collected using both traditional manual data entry and the EHR2EDC module. The outcome variable was the percentage of data accurately transferred using the EHR2EDC technology. This percentage was calculated considering all collected data and the data in four domains: demographics (DM), vital signs (VS), laboratories (LB) and concomitant medications (CM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 6143 data points (39.6% of the data in the scope of the TransFAIR study and 16.9% when considering all data) were accurately transferred using the platform. LB data represented 65.4% of the data transferred; VS data, 30.8%; DM data, 0.7% and CM data, 3.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The objective of accurately transferring at least 15% of the manually entered trial datapoints using the EHR2EDC module was achieved. Collaboration and codesign by hospitals, industry, technology company, supported by the Institute of Innovation through Health Data was a success factor in accomplishing these results. Further work should focus on the harmonisation of data standards and improved interoperability to extend the scope of transferable EHR data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:包括食品和药物管理局和欧洲药品管理局在内的监管机构鼓励使用常规收集的数据进行临床试验。TransFAIR实验比较的目的是评估在现实生活条件下,电子健康记录到电子数据采集(EHR2EDC)模块准确地将不同治疗领域的临床研究患者数据从ehr系统传输到EDC系统的能力。方法:一项前瞻性研究,包括在欧洲三家医院进行的三家不同赞助商的六项临床试验。使用传统的手动数据输入和EHR2EDC模块收集了来自六项研究的相同数据。结果变量是使用EHR2EDC技术准确传输数据的百分比。该百分比是根据所有收集的数据和四个领域的数据计算的:人口统计(DM)、生命体征(VS)、实验室(LB)和伴随药物(CM)。结果:总体而言,6143个数据点(占TransFAIR研究范围内数据的39.6%,占所有数据的16.9%)通过该平台准确转移。LB数据占传输数据的65.4%;VS数据,30.8%;DM数据为0.7%,CM数据为3.1%。结论:使用EHR2EDC模块准确转移至少15%人工输入试验数据点的目标已经实现。在健康数据创新研究所的支持下,医院、工业、技术公司的协作和共同设计是取得这些成果的一个成功因素。进一步的工作应侧重于数据标准的协调和改进互操作性,以扩大可转移电子病历数据的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

TransFAIR study: a European multicentre experimental comparison of EHR2EDC technology to the usual manual method for eCRF data collection.

TransFAIR study: a European multicentre experimental comparison of EHR2EDC technology to the usual manual method for eCRF data collection.

TransFAIR study: a European multicentre experimental comparison of EHR2EDC technology to the usual manual method for eCRF data collection.

TransFAIR study: a European multicentre experimental comparison of EHR2EDC technology to the usual manual method for eCRF data collection.

Purpose: Regulatory authorities including the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency are encouraging to conduct clinical trials using routinely collected data. The aim of the TransFAIR experimental comparison was to evaluate, within real-life conditions, the ability of the Electronic Health Records to Electronic Data Capture (EHR2EDC) module to accurately transfer from EHRs to EDC systems patients' data of clinical studies in various therapeutic areas.

Methods: A prospective study including six clinical trials from three different sponsors running in three hospitals across Europe has been conducted. The same data from the six studies were collected using both traditional manual data entry and the EHR2EDC module. The outcome variable was the percentage of data accurately transferred using the EHR2EDC technology. This percentage was calculated considering all collected data and the data in four domains: demographics (DM), vital signs (VS), laboratories (LB) and concomitant medications (CM).

Results: Overall, 6143 data points (39.6% of the data in the scope of the TransFAIR study and 16.9% when considering all data) were accurately transferred using the platform. LB data represented 65.4% of the data transferred; VS data, 30.8%; DM data, 0.7% and CM data, 3.1%.

Conclusions: The objective of accurately transferring at least 15% of the manually entered trial datapoints using the EHR2EDC module was achieved. Collaboration and codesign by hospitals, industry, technology company, supported by the Institute of Innovation through Health Data was a success factor in accomplishing these results. Further work should focus on the harmonisation of data standards and improved interoperability to extend the scope of transferable EHR data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信