{"title":"增税少工:扭转“攀比”和不平等加剧的局面。","authors":"Felix FitzRoy, Jim Jin, Michael Nolan","doi":"10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To counteract excessive effort due to relative income comparison among identical agents, the literature suggests a tax response equal to the negative externality. Assuming a general income distribution, we show that an optimal tax must be higher under a general social welfare function, to not only reduce inefficiency but also inequality. We recommend a practical tax response to stronger comparison - to hold employment constant, which does not require unrealistic information including unobservable comparison. Surprisingly, the tax response will dominate the comparison effect and <i>reduce</i> labour supply or reverse \"keeping up with the Joneses\" on intensive margins, and also reverse the otherwise rising inequality.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":73717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria : Online)","volume":"139 3","pages":"177-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher tax and less work: reverse \\\"Keep up with the Joneses\\\" and rising inequality.\",\"authors\":\"Felix FitzRoy, Jim Jin, Michael Nolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To counteract excessive effort due to relative income comparison among identical agents, the literature suggests a tax response equal to the negative externality. Assuming a general income distribution, we show that an optimal tax must be higher under a general social welfare function, to not only reduce inefficiency but also inequality. We recommend a practical tax response to stronger comparison - to hold employment constant, which does not require unrealistic information including unobservable comparison. Surprisingly, the tax response will dominate the comparison effect and <i>reduce</i> labour supply or reverse \\\"keeping up with the Joneses\\\" on intensive margins, and also reverse the otherwise rising inequality.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria : Online)\",\"volume\":\"139 3\",\"pages\":\"177-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria : Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria : Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Higher tax and less work: reverse "Keep up with the Joneses" and rising inequality.
To counteract excessive effort due to relative income comparison among identical agents, the literature suggests a tax response equal to the negative externality. Assuming a general income distribution, we show that an optimal tax must be higher under a general social welfare function, to not only reduce inefficiency but also inequality. We recommend a practical tax response to stronger comparison - to hold employment constant, which does not require unrealistic information including unobservable comparison. Surprisingly, the tax response will dominate the comparison effect and reduce labour supply or reverse "keeping up with the Joneses" on intensive margins, and also reverse the otherwise rising inequality.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2.