增税少工:扭转“攀比”和不平等加剧的局面。

Felix FitzRoy, Jim Jin, Michael Nolan
{"title":"增税少工:扭转“攀比”和不平等加剧的局面。","authors":"Felix FitzRoy,&nbsp;Jim Jin,&nbsp;Michael Nolan","doi":"10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To counteract excessive effort due to relative income comparison among identical agents, the literature suggests a tax response equal to the negative externality. Assuming a general income distribution, we show that an optimal tax must be higher under a general social welfare function, to not only reduce inefficiency but also inequality. We recommend a practical tax response to stronger comparison - to hold employment constant, which does not require unrealistic information including unobservable comparison. Surprisingly, the tax response will dominate the comparison effect and <i>reduce</i> labour supply or reverse \"keeping up with the Joneses\" on intensive margins, and also reverse the otherwise rising inequality.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":73717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria : Online)","volume":"139 3","pages":"177-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher tax and less work: reverse \\\"Keep up with the Joneses\\\" and rising inequality.\",\"authors\":\"Felix FitzRoy,&nbsp;Jim Jin,&nbsp;Michael Nolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To counteract excessive effort due to relative income comparison among identical agents, the literature suggests a tax response equal to the negative externality. Assuming a general income distribution, we show that an optimal tax must be higher under a general social welfare function, to not only reduce inefficiency but also inequality. We recommend a practical tax response to stronger comparison - to hold employment constant, which does not require unrealistic information including unobservable comparison. Surprisingly, the tax response will dominate the comparison effect and <i>reduce</i> labour supply or reverse \\\"keeping up with the Joneses\\\" on intensive margins, and also reverse the otherwise rising inequality.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria : Online)\",\"volume\":\"139 3\",\"pages\":\"177-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria : Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria : Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了抵消由于相同代理人之间的相对收入比较而产生的过度努力,文献表明,税收反应等于负外部性。假设一般收入分配,我们表明,在一般社会福利函数下,最优税收必须更高,这样不仅可以减少效率低下,还可以减少不平等。我们建议对更强的比较采取切实可行的税收对策——保持就业不变,这不需要不切实际的信息,包括不可观察的比较。令人惊讶的是,税收反应将主导比较效应,减少劳动力供应,或扭转集约利润率上的“攀比”,还将扭转原本日益加剧的不平等。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Higher tax and less work: reverse "Keep up with the Joneses" and rising inequality.

To counteract excessive effort due to relative income comparison among identical agents, the literature suggests a tax response equal to the negative externality. Assuming a general income distribution, we show that an optimal tax must be higher under a general social welfare function, to not only reduce inefficiency but also inequality. We recommend a practical tax response to stronger comparison - to hold employment constant, which does not require unrealistic information including unobservable comparison. Surprisingly, the tax response will dominate the comparison effect and reduce labour supply or reverse "keeping up with the Joneses" on intensive margins, and also reverse the otherwise rising inequality.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信