“早期发现患有发展性语言障碍的西班牙语儿童:简短问卷和筛查测试的同时有效性”

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Alejandra Auza B , Chiharu Murata , Christian Peñaloza
{"title":"“早期发现患有发展性语言障碍的西班牙语儿童:简短问卷和筛查测试的同时有效性”","authors":"Alejandra Auza B ,&nbsp;Chiharu Murata ,&nbsp;Christian Peñaloza","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>. Under-identification of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is a significant problem in monolingual Latin American Spanish-speaking children. We evaluated the identification utility of the sequential use of two screening tools, the \"Parental Questionnaire (PQ)\" and the \"Screening for Language Problems (TPL)\", to identify children who require confirmatory diagnosis of DLD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>: Parents of children (4 to 6 years) were contacted in schools and public health centers in Mexico. Monolingual Spanish-speaking children with no auditory and cognitive disorders were eligible. The reference diagnosis of DLD was established using BESA (Bilingual English-Spanish Assessment) or SCELF-4 (Spanish Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals), combined with data from the narrative samples that yielded the percentage of ungrammaticality and the clinical judgment of two Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs). Responses to the PQ were obtained as a parental report, and the TPL was applied by a trained SLPs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>. Both PQ and TPL presented a significant difference between the groups of children with DLD and typical language development (TLD). By combining the two instruments, a notable improvement in diagnostic utility was shown.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>. The combination of these two procedures provides an efficient method for screening children having the risk of DLD and contributes to resolving the problem of under-identification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 106339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Early detection of Spanish-speaking children with developmental language disorders: Concurrent validity of a short questionnaire and a screening test”\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Auza B ,&nbsp;Chiharu Murata ,&nbsp;Christian Peñaloza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>. Under-identification of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is a significant problem in monolingual Latin American Spanish-speaking children. We evaluated the identification utility of the sequential use of two screening tools, the \\\"Parental Questionnaire (PQ)\\\" and the \\\"Screening for Language Problems (TPL)\\\", to identify children who require confirmatory diagnosis of DLD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>: Parents of children (4 to 6 years) were contacted in schools and public health centers in Mexico. Monolingual Spanish-speaking children with no auditory and cognitive disorders were eligible. The reference diagnosis of DLD was established using BESA (Bilingual English-Spanish Assessment) or SCELF-4 (Spanish Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals), combined with data from the narrative samples that yielded the percentage of ungrammaticality and the clinical judgment of two Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs). Responses to the PQ were obtained as a parental report, and the TPL was applied by a trained SLPs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>. Both PQ and TPL presented a significant difference between the groups of children with DLD and typical language development (TLD). By combining the two instruments, a notable improvement in diagnostic utility was shown.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>. The combination of these two procedures provides an efficient method for screening children having the risk of DLD and contributes to resolving the problem of under-identification.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992423000394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992423000394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景发展性语言障碍(DLD)的识别不足是拉丁美洲西班牙语单语儿童的一个重要问题。我们评估了连续使用“父母问卷(PQ)”和“语言问题筛查(TPL)”两种筛查工具来识别需要DLD确诊的儿童的识别效用。方法:在墨西哥的学校和公共卫生中心联系儿童(4-6岁)的父母。没有听觉和认知障碍的西班牙语单语儿童符合条件。DLD的参考诊断是使用BESA(英语-西班牙语双语评估)或SCELF-4(语言基础的西班牙语临床评估),结合来自叙述性样本的数据来确定的,这些数据产生了不符合语法的百分比和两位言语语言病理学家(SLP)的临床判断。结果:在DLD和典型语言发展(TLD)儿童组之间,PQ和TPL均表现出显著差异。通过将这两种仪器相结合,显示出诊断实用性的显著提高。结论这两种程序的结合为筛查有DLD风险的儿童提供了一种有效的方法,并有助于解决识别不足的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Early detection of Spanish-speaking children with developmental language disorders: Concurrent validity of a short questionnaire and a screening test”

Background

. Under-identification of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is a significant problem in monolingual Latin American Spanish-speaking children. We evaluated the identification utility of the sequential use of two screening tools, the "Parental Questionnaire (PQ)" and the "Screening for Language Problems (TPL)", to identify children who require confirmatory diagnosis of DLD.

Methods

: Parents of children (4 to 6 years) were contacted in schools and public health centers in Mexico. Monolingual Spanish-speaking children with no auditory and cognitive disorders were eligible. The reference diagnosis of DLD was established using BESA (Bilingual English-Spanish Assessment) or SCELF-4 (Spanish Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals), combined with data from the narrative samples that yielded the percentage of ungrammaticality and the clinical judgment of two Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs). Responses to the PQ were obtained as a parental report, and the TPL was applied by a trained SLPs.

Results

. Both PQ and TPL presented a significant difference between the groups of children with DLD and typical language development (TLD). By combining the two instruments, a notable improvement in diagnostic utility was shown.

Conclusion

. The combination of these two procedures provides an efficient method for screening children having the risk of DLD and contributes to resolving the problem of under-identification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信