Yueyang Bao, John Lee, Udit Thakur, Satish Ramkumar, Thomas H Marwick
{"title":"癌症幸存者的房颤——系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yueyang Bao, John Lee, Udit Thakur, Satish Ramkumar, Thomas H Marwick","doi":"10.1186/s40959-023-00180-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac complication during cancer treatment. It is unclear if cancer survivors have increased AF risk when compared to the population. AF screening is now recommended in patients ≥65 years, however there are no specific recommendations in the oncology population. We sought to compare the AF detection rate of cancer survivors compared to the general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science databases using search terms related to AF and cancer mapped to subject headings. We included English language studies, limited to adults > 18 years who were > 12 months post completion of cancer treatment. Using a random-effects model we calculated the overall AF detection rate. Meta-regression analysis was performed to assess for potential causes for study heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included in the study. The combined AF detection rate amongst all the studies was 4.7% (95% C.I 4.0-5.4%), which equated to a combined annualised AF rate of 0.7% (95% C.I 0.1-0.98%). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I<sup>2</sup> = 99.8%, p < 0.001). In the breast cancer cohort (n = 6 studies), the combined annualised AF rate was 0.9% (95% C.I 0.1-2.3%), with significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 99.9%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whilst the results should be interpreted with caution due to study heterogeneity, AF rates in patients with cancer survival >12 months were not significantly increased compared to the general population.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>Open Science Framework - DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/APSYG .</p>","PeriodicalId":9804,"journal":{"name":"Cardio-oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atrial fibrillation in cancer survivors - a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yueyang Bao, John Lee, Udit Thakur, Satish Ramkumar, Thomas H Marwick\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40959-023-00180-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac complication during cancer treatment. It is unclear if cancer survivors have increased AF risk when compared to the population. AF screening is now recommended in patients ≥65 years, however there are no specific recommendations in the oncology population. We sought to compare the AF detection rate of cancer survivors compared to the general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science databases using search terms related to AF and cancer mapped to subject headings. We included English language studies, limited to adults > 18 years who were > 12 months post completion of cancer treatment. Using a random-effects model we calculated the overall AF detection rate. Meta-regression analysis was performed to assess for potential causes for study heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included in the study. The combined AF detection rate amongst all the studies was 4.7% (95% C.I 4.0-5.4%), which equated to a combined annualised AF rate of 0.7% (95% C.I 0.1-0.98%). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I<sup>2</sup> = 99.8%, p < 0.001). In the breast cancer cohort (n = 6 studies), the combined annualised AF rate was 0.9% (95% C.I 0.1-2.3%), with significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 99.9%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whilst the results should be interpreted with caution due to study heterogeneity, AF rates in patients with cancer survival >12 months were not significantly increased compared to the general population.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>Open Science Framework - DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/APSYG .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardio-oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardio-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-023-00180-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardio-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-023-00180-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:心房颤动(AF)是癌症治疗过程中常见的心脏并发症。目前尚不清楚癌症幸存者与人群相比是否增加了房颤风险。目前建议≥65岁的患者进行房颤筛查,但在肿瘤人群中没有具体的建议。我们试图比较癌症幸存者与一般人群的房颤检出率。方法:我们检索Pubmed, Embase和Web of Science数据库,使用与AF和癌症相关的搜索词映射到主题标题。我们纳入了英语语言研究,仅限于18岁以上、癌症治疗完成后12个月以上的成年人。使用随机效应模型,我们计算了整体AF检出率。进行meta回归分析以评估研究异质性的潜在原因。结果:共纳入16项研究。所有研究中合并心房颤动检出率为4.7% (95% ci . 4.0-5.4%),相当于合并年化心房颤动检出率为0.7% (95% ci . 0.1-0.98%)。研究之间存在显著的异质性(I2 = 99.8%, p 2 = 99.9%, p)结论:由于研究的异质性,结果应谨慎解释,与一般人群相比,癌症生存期>12个月的患者房颤发生率没有显著增加。研究注册:开放科学框架- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/APSYG。
Atrial fibrillation in cancer survivors - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac complication during cancer treatment. It is unclear if cancer survivors have increased AF risk when compared to the population. AF screening is now recommended in patients ≥65 years, however there are no specific recommendations in the oncology population. We sought to compare the AF detection rate of cancer survivors compared to the general population.
Methods: We searched the Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science databases using search terms related to AF and cancer mapped to subject headings. We included English language studies, limited to adults > 18 years who were > 12 months post completion of cancer treatment. Using a random-effects model we calculated the overall AF detection rate. Meta-regression analysis was performed to assess for potential causes for study heterogeneity.
Results: Sixteen studies were included in the study. The combined AF detection rate amongst all the studies was 4.7% (95% C.I 4.0-5.4%), which equated to a combined annualised AF rate of 0.7% (95% C.I 0.1-0.98%). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 99.8%, p < 0.001). In the breast cancer cohort (n = 6 studies), the combined annualised AF rate was 0.9% (95% C.I 0.1-2.3%), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99.9%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Whilst the results should be interpreted with caution due to study heterogeneity, AF rates in patients with cancer survival >12 months were not significantly increased compared to the general population.
Study registration: Open Science Framework - DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/APSYG .