骨科和创伤科住院医师——COVID-19大流行期间cnrm / sbot评估一致性的全国概况和分析

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Viviane Cristina Uliana Peterle, Luiz Koiti Kimura, Paulo Emiliano Bezerra, Anne Caroline Castro Pereira, Bruna Paiva DE França, Nathalia Moura Ramos
{"title":"骨科和创伤科住院医师——COVID-19大流行期间cnrm / sbot评估一致性的全国概况和分析","authors":"Viviane Cristina Uliana Peterle,&nbsp;Luiz Koiti Kimura,&nbsp;Paulo Emiliano Bezerra,&nbsp;Anne Caroline Castro Pereira,&nbsp;Bruna Paiva DE França,&nbsp;Nathalia Moura Ramos","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220233102e260339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the national scenario of the orthopedics and traumatology Medical Residency Program (MRP) in 2020/2021, showing the distribution of vacancies by states and regions of Brazil, the number of residents and the percentage of agreement between the accredited services that offer the program by the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT) and by the National Commission for Medical Residency linked to the Ministry of Education (CNRM/MEC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Data from the CNRM and SBOT system referring to residents attending orthopedics and traumatology Programs in 2020/2021 were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analyzed period, there were 2.325 medical residents in orthopedics and traumatology in vacancies authorized by the CNRM/MEC in Brazil. The southeast region was predominant, with 57.2% of vacancies, totaling 1.331 residents. Compared to other regions, the south region with 16.9% (392), the northeast with 15.1% (351), the midwest with 7.7% (180), and the north with 3.1% (71). In addition, there was an accreditation agreement of 53.8% in evaluating services between the SBOT and CNRM, with distinctions among the states.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis showed differences between regions and states, considering the vacancies of PRM in orthopedics and traumatology and the concordance of evaluations by institutions accredited by MEC and SBOT. It is aim to work together with a view to qualifying and expanding residency programs for the training of specialist physicians, in accordance with the needs of the public health system and adequate medical practice, is necessary. The analysis during the pandemic period, associated with the restructuring of several health services, demonstrates the stability of the specialty in adverse scenarios. Level of evidence II; Economic And Decision Analyzes - Developing an Economic or Decision Model.</p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEDICAL RESIDENCE IN ORTHOPEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY - NATIONAL OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF EVALUATION CONCORDANCE BETWEEN CNRM/SBOT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.\",\"authors\":\"Viviane Cristina Uliana Peterle,&nbsp;Luiz Koiti Kimura,&nbsp;Paulo Emiliano Bezerra,&nbsp;Anne Caroline Castro Pereira,&nbsp;Bruna Paiva DE França,&nbsp;Nathalia Moura Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-785220233102e260339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the national scenario of the orthopedics and traumatology Medical Residency Program (MRP) in 2020/2021, showing the distribution of vacancies by states and regions of Brazil, the number of residents and the percentage of agreement between the accredited services that offer the program by the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT) and by the National Commission for Medical Residency linked to the Ministry of Education (CNRM/MEC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Data from the CNRM and SBOT system referring to residents attending orthopedics and traumatology Programs in 2020/2021 were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analyzed period, there were 2.325 medical residents in orthopedics and traumatology in vacancies authorized by the CNRM/MEC in Brazil. The southeast region was predominant, with 57.2% of vacancies, totaling 1.331 residents. Compared to other regions, the south region with 16.9% (392), the northeast with 15.1% (351), the midwest with 7.7% (180), and the north with 3.1% (71). In addition, there was an accreditation agreement of 53.8% in evaluating services between the SBOT and CNRM, with distinctions among the states.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis showed differences between regions and states, considering the vacancies of PRM in orthopedics and traumatology and the concordance of evaluations by institutions accredited by MEC and SBOT. It is aim to work together with a view to qualifying and expanding residency programs for the training of specialist physicians, in accordance with the needs of the public health system and adequate medical practice, is necessary. The analysis during the pandemic period, associated with the restructuring of several health services, demonstrates the stability of the specialty in adverse scenarios. Level of evidence II; Economic And Decision Analyzes - Developing an Economic or Decision Model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263441/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233102e260339\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233102e260339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述2020/2021年骨科和创伤医学住院医师计划(MRP)的国家情况,显示巴西各州和地区的空缺分布,居民人数以及巴西骨科和创伤学会(SBOT)和与教育部(CNRM/MEC)相关的国家医疗住院医师委员会提供该计划的认可服务之间的协议百分比。方法:这是一项描述性、横断面研究。分析CNRM和SBOT系统中2020/2021年骨科和创伤学专业住院医师的数据。结果:分析期内巴西CNRM/MEC授权的骨科和创伤科空缺住院医师共计2.325人。东南地区居多,空置率为57.2%,共有1331人。与其他地区相比,南部地区(392人)占16.9%,东北地区(351人)占15.1%,中西部地区(180人)占7.7%,北部地区(71人)占3.1%。此外,SBOT和CNRM在评估服务方面有53.8%的认可协议,各州之间存在差异。结论:考虑到骨科和创伤科PRM的空缺,以及MEC和SBOT认可机构评估的一致性,分析显示地区和州之间存在差异。根据公共卫生系统的需要和充分的医疗实践,我们的目标是共同努力,以符合和扩大专科医生培训的住院医师计划。大流行期间的分析与若干保健服务机构的改组相结合,表明该专业在不利情况下的稳定性。证据等级II;经济和决策分析-发展经济或决策模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

MEDICAL RESIDENCE IN ORTHOPEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY - NATIONAL OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF EVALUATION CONCORDANCE BETWEEN CNRM/SBOT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

MEDICAL RESIDENCE IN ORTHOPEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY - NATIONAL OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF EVALUATION CONCORDANCE BETWEEN CNRM/SBOT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

Objective: Describe the national scenario of the orthopedics and traumatology Medical Residency Program (MRP) in 2020/2021, showing the distribution of vacancies by states and regions of Brazil, the number of residents and the percentage of agreement between the accredited services that offer the program by the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT) and by the National Commission for Medical Residency linked to the Ministry of Education (CNRM/MEC).

Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Data from the CNRM and SBOT system referring to residents attending orthopedics and traumatology Programs in 2020/2021 were analyzed.

Results: In the analyzed period, there were 2.325 medical residents in orthopedics and traumatology in vacancies authorized by the CNRM/MEC in Brazil. The southeast region was predominant, with 57.2% of vacancies, totaling 1.331 residents. Compared to other regions, the south region with 16.9% (392), the northeast with 15.1% (351), the midwest with 7.7% (180), and the north with 3.1% (71). In addition, there was an accreditation agreement of 53.8% in evaluating services between the SBOT and CNRM, with distinctions among the states.

Conclusion: The analysis showed differences between regions and states, considering the vacancies of PRM in orthopedics and traumatology and the concordance of evaluations by institutions accredited by MEC and SBOT. It is aim to work together with a view to qualifying and expanding residency programs for the training of specialist physicians, in accordance with the needs of the public health system and adequate medical practice, is necessary. The analysis during the pandemic period, associated with the restructuring of several health services, demonstrates the stability of the specialty in adverse scenarios. Level of evidence II; Economic And Decision Analyzes - Developing an Economic or Decision Model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信