支持避孕选择和使用的干预措施:系统评价的全球系统地图。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Preethy D'Souza, Tenzin Phagdol, Sonia R B D'Souza, D S Anupama, Baby S Nayak, Binil Velayudhan, Julia V Bailey, Judith Stephenson, Sandy Oliver
{"title":"支持避孕选择和使用的干预措施:系统评价的全球系统地图。","authors":"Preethy D'Souza,&nbsp;Tenzin Phagdol,&nbsp;Sonia R B D'Souza,&nbsp;D S Anupama,&nbsp;Baby S Nayak,&nbsp;Binil Velayudhan,&nbsp;Julia V Bailey,&nbsp;Judith Stephenson,&nbsp;Sandy Oliver","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2022.2162337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To review the highest level of available evidence, a systematic map identified systematic reviews that evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to improve contraception choice and increase contraception use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic reviews published since 2000 were identified from searches of nine databases. Data were extracted using a coding tool developed for this systematic map. Methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2 criteria.</p><p><strong>Findings and conclusion: </strong>Fifty systematic reviews reported evaluations of interventions for contraception choice and use addressing three domains (individual, couples, community); Meta-analyses in 11 of the reviews mostly addressed interventions for individuals. We identified 26 reviews covering High Income Countries, 12 reviews covering Low Middle-Income Countries and the rest a mix of both. Most reviews (15) focussed on psychosocial interventions, followed by incentives (6) and m-health interventions (6). The strongest evidence from meta-analyses is for the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, contraceptive counselling, psychosocial interventions, school-based education, and interventions promoting contraceptive access, demand-generation interventions (community and facility based, financial mechanisms and mass media), and mobile phone message interventions. Even in resource constrained settings, community-based interventions can increase contraceptive use. There are gaps in the evidence on interventions for contraception choice and use, and limitations in study designs and lack of representativeness. Most approaches focus on individual women rather than couples or wider socio-cultural influences on contraception and fertility. This review identifies interventions which work to increase contraception choice and use, and these could be implemented in school, healthcare or community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to support contraceptive choice and use: a global systematic map of systematic reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Preethy D'Souza,&nbsp;Tenzin Phagdol,&nbsp;Sonia R B D'Souza,&nbsp;D S Anupama,&nbsp;Baby S Nayak,&nbsp;Binil Velayudhan,&nbsp;Julia V Bailey,&nbsp;Judith Stephenson,&nbsp;Sandy Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2022.2162337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To review the highest level of available evidence, a systematic map identified systematic reviews that evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to improve contraception choice and increase contraception use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic reviews published since 2000 were identified from searches of nine databases. Data were extracted using a coding tool developed for this systematic map. Methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2 criteria.</p><p><strong>Findings and conclusion: </strong>Fifty systematic reviews reported evaluations of interventions for contraception choice and use addressing three domains (individual, couples, community); Meta-analyses in 11 of the reviews mostly addressed interventions for individuals. We identified 26 reviews covering High Income Countries, 12 reviews covering Low Middle-Income Countries and the rest a mix of both. Most reviews (15) focussed on psychosocial interventions, followed by incentives (6) and m-health interventions (6). The strongest evidence from meta-analyses is for the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, contraceptive counselling, psychosocial interventions, school-based education, and interventions promoting contraceptive access, demand-generation interventions (community and facility based, financial mechanisms and mass media), and mobile phone message interventions. Even in resource constrained settings, community-based interventions can increase contraceptive use. There are gaps in the evidence on interventions for contraception choice and use, and limitations in study designs and lack of representativeness. Most approaches focus on individual women rather than couples or wider socio-cultural influences on contraception and fertility. This review identifies interventions which work to increase contraception choice and use, and these could be implemented in school, healthcare or community settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2022.2162337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2022.2162337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:为了回顾现有证据的最高水平,系统地图确定了评估干预措施改善避孕选择和增加避孕措施使用有效性的系统综述。方法:从9个数据库检索2000年以来发表的系统综述。数据是用为这个系统地图开发的编码工具提取的。采用AMSTAR 2标准评估纳入评价的方法学质量。研究结果和结论:50篇系统综述报告了针对三个领域(个人、夫妻、社区)的避孕选择和使用干预措施的评估;其中11篇综述的荟萃分析主要针对个人干预措施。我们确定了26篇综述,涵盖高收入国家,12篇综述,涵盖中低收入国家,其余的是两者的混合。大多数评论(15)侧重于社会心理干预,其次是激励措施(6)和移动健康干预措施(6)。来自荟萃分析的最有力证据表明,动机性访谈、避孕咨询、社会心理干预、学校教育和促进获得避孕药具的干预措施、产生需求的干预措施(基于社区和设施、金融机制和大众媒体)以及移动电话短信干预措施是有效的。即使在资源有限的情况下,以社区为基础的干预措施也可以增加避孕药具的使用。关于避孕选择和使用干预措施的证据存在空白,研究设计存在局限性,缺乏代表性。大多数方法侧重于妇女个人,而不是夫妇或对避孕和生育的更广泛的社会文化影响。本综述确定了有助于增加避孕选择和使用的干预措施,这些干预措施可以在学校、卫生保健或社区环境中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions to support contraceptive choice and use: a global systematic map of systematic reviews.

Background: To review the highest level of available evidence, a systematic map identified systematic reviews that evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to improve contraception choice and increase contraception use.

Methods: Systematic reviews published since 2000 were identified from searches of nine databases. Data were extracted using a coding tool developed for this systematic map. Methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2 criteria.

Findings and conclusion: Fifty systematic reviews reported evaluations of interventions for contraception choice and use addressing three domains (individual, couples, community); Meta-analyses in 11 of the reviews mostly addressed interventions for individuals. We identified 26 reviews covering High Income Countries, 12 reviews covering Low Middle-Income Countries and the rest a mix of both. Most reviews (15) focussed on psychosocial interventions, followed by incentives (6) and m-health interventions (6). The strongest evidence from meta-analyses is for the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, contraceptive counselling, psychosocial interventions, school-based education, and interventions promoting contraceptive access, demand-generation interventions (community and facility based, financial mechanisms and mass media), and mobile phone message interventions. Even in resource constrained settings, community-based interventions can increase contraceptive use. There are gaps in the evidence on interventions for contraception choice and use, and limitations in study designs and lack of representativeness. Most approaches focus on individual women rather than couples or wider socio-cultural influences on contraception and fertility. This review identifies interventions which work to increase contraception choice and use, and these could be implemented in school, healthcare or community settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信