脱水儿童患者下腔静脉与主动脉的比率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.3345/cep.2022.01445
Gilbert Sterling Octavius, Michelle Imanuelly, Johan Wibowo, Nadia Khoirunnisa Heryadi, Melanie Widjaja
{"title":"脱水儿童患者下腔静脉与主动脉的比率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gilbert Sterling Octavius, Michelle Imanuelly, Johan Wibowo, Nadia Khoirunnisa Heryadi, Melanie Widjaja","doi":"10.3345/cep.2022.01445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dehydration due to acute diarrhea is among the leading causes of mortality. However, advancements in management and technology do not help clinicians differentiate dehydration degrees. Ultrasound using the inferior vena cava to aorta (IVC/ Ao) ratio is a promising noninvasive technique to identify significant pediatric dehydration.</p><p><strong>Puspose: </strong>Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the diagnostic parameters of the IVC/Ao ratio for predicting clinically significant dehydration in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases for studies of pediatric patients (≤18 years old) who presented with signs and symptoms of dehydration due to acute diarrhea, gastroenteritis, or vomiting. The inclusion criteria were cross-sectional, case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trial study design and publication in any language. We then conducted a meta-analysis using the midas and metandi commands from Stata software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies of 461 patients were included. The combined sensitivity was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%-91%), while the specificity was 73% (95% CI, 59%-84%). The area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91). The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 3.2 (95% CI, 2.1-5.1) with a 76% posttest probability, while the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.12-0.28) with a 16% posttest probability. The combined negative predictive value was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.91), while the positive predictive value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IVC/Ao ratio was insufficient to exclude or confirm significant dehydration in pediatric patients. More studies are needed, especially multicenter, adequately powered diagnostic research, to will help establish the usefulness of the IVC/Ao ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":36018,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626024/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inferior vena cava to aorta ratio in dehydrated pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gilbert Sterling Octavius, Michelle Imanuelly, Johan Wibowo, Nadia Khoirunnisa Heryadi, Melanie Widjaja\",\"doi\":\"10.3345/cep.2022.01445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dehydration due to acute diarrhea is among the leading causes of mortality. However, advancements in management and technology do not help clinicians differentiate dehydration degrees. Ultrasound using the inferior vena cava to aorta (IVC/ Ao) ratio is a promising noninvasive technique to identify significant pediatric dehydration.</p><p><strong>Puspose: </strong>Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the diagnostic parameters of the IVC/Ao ratio for predicting clinically significant dehydration in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases for studies of pediatric patients (≤18 years old) who presented with signs and symptoms of dehydration due to acute diarrhea, gastroenteritis, or vomiting. The inclusion criteria were cross-sectional, case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trial study design and publication in any language. We then conducted a meta-analysis using the midas and metandi commands from Stata software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies of 461 patients were included. The combined sensitivity was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%-91%), while the specificity was 73% (95% CI, 59%-84%). The area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91). The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 3.2 (95% CI, 2.1-5.1) with a 76% posttest probability, while the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.12-0.28) with a 16% posttest probability. The combined negative predictive value was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.91), while the positive predictive value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IVC/Ao ratio was insufficient to exclude or confirm significant dehydration in pediatric patients. More studies are needed, especially multicenter, adequately powered diagnostic research, to will help establish the usefulness of the IVC/Ao ratio.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2022.01445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2022.01445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:急性腹泻引起的脱水是导致死亡的主要原因之一。然而,管理和技术的进步并不能帮助临床医生区分脱水程度。使用下腔静脉与主动脉(IVC/Ao)比率的超声检查是一种很有前途的无创技术,可用于识别严重的儿童脱水。Puspose:因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在检查IVC/Ao比率的诊断参数,以预测儿科患者的临床显著脱水。方法:我们在MEDLINE、PubMed、Cochrane Library、ScienceDirect和Google Scholar数据库中搜索对因急性腹泻、肠胃炎或呕吐而出现脱水体征和症状的儿科患者(≤18岁)的研究。纳入标准为横断面、病例对照、队列和随机对照试验研究设计并以任何语言发表。然后,我们使用Stata软件中的midas和metandi命令进行了荟萃分析。结果:纳入461名患者的5项研究。联合灵敏度为86%(95%置信区间[CI],79%-91%),而特异性为73%(95%可信区间,59%-84%)。曲线下面积为0.89(95%置信区间,0.86-0.91)。阳性似然比(LR+)为3.2(95%可信区间,2.1-5.1),测试后概率为76%,而阴性似然比(LR-)为0.18(95%置信度,0.12-0.28),测试前概率为16%。综合阴性预测值为0.83(95%可信区间,0.75-0.91),阳性预测值为0.75(95%置信区间,0.68-0.82)。需要更多的研究,特别是多中心、充分有力的诊断研究,以帮助确定IVC/Ao比率的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inferior vena cava to aorta ratio in dehydrated pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Inferior vena cava to aorta ratio in dehydrated pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Inferior vena cava to aorta ratio in dehydrated pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Dehydration due to acute diarrhea is among the leading causes of mortality. However, advancements in management and technology do not help clinicians differentiate dehydration degrees. Ultrasound using the inferior vena cava to aorta (IVC/ Ao) ratio is a promising noninvasive technique to identify significant pediatric dehydration.

Puspose: Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the diagnostic parameters of the IVC/Ao ratio for predicting clinically significant dehydration in pediatric patients.

Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases for studies of pediatric patients (≤18 years old) who presented with signs and symptoms of dehydration due to acute diarrhea, gastroenteritis, or vomiting. The inclusion criteria were cross-sectional, case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trial study design and publication in any language. We then conducted a meta-analysis using the midas and metandi commands from Stata software.

Results: Five studies of 461 patients were included. The combined sensitivity was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%-91%), while the specificity was 73% (95% CI, 59%-84%). The area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91). The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 3.2 (95% CI, 2.1-5.1) with a 76% posttest probability, while the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.12-0.28) with a 16% posttest probability. The combined negative predictive value was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.91), while the positive predictive value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.82).

Conclusion: The IVC/Ao ratio was insufficient to exclude or confirm significant dehydration in pediatric patients. More studies are needed, especially multicenter, adequately powered diagnostic research, to will help establish the usefulness of the IVC/Ao ratio.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.40%
发文量
88
审稿时长
60 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信