脊医专业流失:近30年研究的叙述性回顾

Q3 Health Professions
Curtis Thor Rigney DC, MRes, Sandra Grace PhD, Joanne Bradbury PhD
{"title":"脊医专业流失:近30年研究的叙述性回顾","authors":"Curtis Thor Rigney DC, MRes,&nbsp;Sandra Grace PhD,&nbsp;Joanne Bradbury PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this review was to investigate and discuss the available literature regarding chiropractic<span> profession attrition.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For this narrative review, searches for peer-reviewed observational and experimental papers published from January 1991 to December 2021 were conducted in the following 5 databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine<span> Database), Scopus<span>, and Web of Science. Keywords included “chiropractic,” “attrition,” and “burnout, professional.” Studies related to student or patient dropouts were excluded.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three of 108 identified papers met the inclusion criteria. Two studies that measured attrition rates reported between 4.5% and 27.8%. These ranges are limited to 1982 to 1991 graduates of Life College of Chiropractic West and individuals issued a California chiropractic license in 1991. The remaining study that investigated the attitudes of nonpracticing chiropractors proposed multifactorial causes leading to attrition. The 3 included studies used retrospective observational design.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The literature is limited, and factors linked to attrition or career mobility remain inconclusive. A better understanding of chiropractic profession attrition rates is needed to offer insights into the profession's practice environment, education, and professional outcomes. Accurate information on attrition may assist with workforce modeling and help prepare for the projected increase in musculoskeletal health care demand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"30 ","pages":"Pages 9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chiropractic Profession Attrition: A Narrative Review of Studies Over the Past 30 Years\",\"authors\":\"Curtis Thor Rigney DC, MRes,&nbsp;Sandra Grace PhD,&nbsp;Joanne Bradbury PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.echu.2023.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this review was to investigate and discuss the available literature regarding chiropractic<span> profession attrition.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For this narrative review, searches for peer-reviewed observational and experimental papers published from January 1991 to December 2021 were conducted in the following 5 databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine<span> Database), Scopus<span>, and Web of Science. Keywords included “chiropractic,” “attrition,” and “burnout, professional.” Studies related to student or patient dropouts were excluded.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three of 108 identified papers met the inclusion criteria. Two studies that measured attrition rates reported between 4.5% and 27.8%. These ranges are limited to 1982 to 1991 graduates of Life College of Chiropractic West and individuals issued a California chiropractic license in 1991. The remaining study that investigated the attitudes of nonpracticing chiropractors proposed multifactorial causes leading to attrition. The 3 included studies used retrospective observational design.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The literature is limited, and factors linked to attrition or career mobility remain inconclusive. A better understanding of chiropractic profession attrition rates is needed to offer insights into the profession's practice environment, education, and professional outcomes. Accurate information on attrition may assist with workforce modeling and help prepare for the projected increase in musculoskeletal health care demand.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 9-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349923000025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349923000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本综述旨在调查和讨论有关脊骨神经医学专业流失的现有文献。方法在以下5个数据库中检索1991年1月至2021年12月发表的同行评审的观察和实验论文:MEDLINE、CINAHL(护理和联合健康文献累积索引)、AMED(联合和补充医学数据库)、Scopus和Web of Science。关键词包括“脊骨神经医学”、“自然减员”和“职业倦怠”。与学生或患者辍学有关的研究被排除在外。结果108篇论文中有3篇符合入选标准。两项测量流失率的研究报告称,流失率在4.5%至27.8%之间。这些范围仅限于1982年至1991年西脊医生命学院毕业生和1991年获得加州脊医执照的个人。剩下的研究调查了非执业脊医的态度,提出了导致自然减员的多因素原因。3项纳入研究采用回顾性观察设计。结论文献有限,与自然减员或职业流动性相关的因素仍不确定。需要更好地了解脊骨神经医学专业的流失率,以便深入了解该专业的执业环境、教育和专业成果。关于损耗的准确信息可能有助于劳动力建模,并有助于为肌肉骨骼医疗保健需求的预计增长做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chiropractic Profession Attrition: A Narrative Review of Studies Over the Past 30 Years

Objective

The purpose of this review was to investigate and discuss the available literature regarding chiropractic profession attrition.

Methods

For this narrative review, searches for peer-reviewed observational and experimental papers published from January 1991 to December 2021 were conducted in the following 5 databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), Scopus, and Web of Science. Keywords included “chiropractic,” “attrition,” and “burnout, professional.” Studies related to student or patient dropouts were excluded.

Results

Three of 108 identified papers met the inclusion criteria. Two studies that measured attrition rates reported between 4.5% and 27.8%. These ranges are limited to 1982 to 1991 graduates of Life College of Chiropractic West and individuals issued a California chiropractic license in 1991. The remaining study that investigated the attitudes of nonpracticing chiropractors proposed multifactorial causes leading to attrition. The 3 included studies used retrospective observational design.

Conclusion

The literature is limited, and factors linked to attrition or career mobility remain inconclusive. A better understanding of chiropractic profession attrition rates is needed to offer insights into the profession's practice environment, education, and professional outcomes. Accurate information on attrition may assist with workforce modeling and help prepare for the projected increase in musculoskeletal health care demand.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信