儿科患者压疮风险评估量表:Braden QD量表的法语翻译、内部一致性、收敛效度、可行性和临床应用

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine
Mélanie Verdon, Anne-Claire Rae, Corinne Palleron, Marie-José Roulin
{"title":"儿科患者压疮风险评估量表:Braden QD量表的法语翻译、内部一致性、收敛效度、可行性和临床应用","authors":"Mélanie Verdon,&nbsp;Anne-Claire Rae,&nbsp;Corinne Palleron,&nbsp;Marie-José Roulin","doi":"10.3917/rsi.149.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric patients are particularly vulnerable to pressure ulcers. Structured evaluation with a risk assessment tool is recommended in order to identify patients at risk. The Braden QD Scale integrates the risks of both immobility-related and medical device-related pressure ulcers in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To translate and pretest the Braden QD Scale into French (Swiss-French version), and to evaluate its consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Over five prevalence surveys, the Braden QD Scale was used on all hospitalized pediatric patients. Convergent validity and internal consistency were tested. A self-administered questionnaire on feasibility and clinical utility was completed by nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated version of the Braden QD Scale was pretested on 352 children. The prevalence surveys showed that 5.1% were at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Medical devices were present in 85.8% of cases. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.710 and a high convergent validity were measured. High scores of feasibility and clinical utility were found.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that the Swiss-French version of the Braden QD Scale is reliable, valid, feasible, and has clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in pediatric patients: French translation, internal consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility of the Braden QD Scale\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Verdon,&nbsp;Anne-Claire Rae,&nbsp;Corinne Palleron,&nbsp;Marie-José Roulin\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/rsi.149.0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric patients are particularly vulnerable to pressure ulcers. Structured evaluation with a risk assessment tool is recommended in order to identify patients at risk. The Braden QD Scale integrates the risks of both immobility-related and medical device-related pressure ulcers in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To translate and pretest the Braden QD Scale into French (Swiss-French version), and to evaluate its consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Over five prevalence surveys, the Braden QD Scale was used on all hospitalized pediatric patients. Convergent validity and internal consistency were tested. A self-administered questionnaire on feasibility and clinical utility was completed by nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated version of the Braden QD Scale was pretested on 352 children. The prevalence surveys showed that 5.1% were at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Medical devices were present in 85.8% of cases. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.710 and a high convergent validity were measured. High scores of feasibility and clinical utility were found.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that the Swiss-French version of the Braden QD Scale is reliable, valid, feasible, and has clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.149.0051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.149.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿科患者特别容易出现压疮。建议使用风险评估工具进行结构化评估,以确定有风险的患者。Braden QD量表整合了儿科患者中与不动相关和与医疗器械相关的压疮风险。目的:将Braden QD量表翻译成法语(瑞士-法语版本)并进行预测,并评估其一致性、收敛效度、可行性和临床实用性。方法:对所有住院儿科患者进行5次患病率调查,采用Braden QD量表。检验了收敛效度和内部一致性。由护士自行填写可行性及临床应用问卷。结果:对352名儿童进行了Braden QD量表的预测。患病率调查显示,5.1%的人有发生压疮的风险。85.8%的病例中有医疗器械。Cronbach’s alpha为0.710,具有较高的收敛效度。可行性和临床实用性得分较高。讨论与结论:本研究提示瑞士-法国版Braden QD量表可靠、有效、可行,具有临床实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in pediatric patients: French translation, internal consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility of the Braden QD Scale

Introduction: Pediatric patients are particularly vulnerable to pressure ulcers. Structured evaluation with a risk assessment tool is recommended in order to identify patients at risk. The Braden QD Scale integrates the risks of both immobility-related and medical device-related pressure ulcers in pediatric patients.

Objectives: To translate and pretest the Braden QD Scale into French (Swiss-French version), and to evaluate its consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility.

Method: Over five prevalence surveys, the Braden QD Scale was used on all hospitalized pediatric patients. Convergent validity and internal consistency were tested. A self-administered questionnaire on feasibility and clinical utility was completed by nurses.

Results: The translated version of the Braden QD Scale was pretested on 352 children. The prevalence surveys showed that 5.1% were at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Medical devices were present in 85.8% of cases. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.710 and a high convergent validity were measured. High scores of feasibility and clinical utility were found.

Discussion and conclusion: This study suggests that the Swiss-French version of the Braden QD Scale is reliable, valid, feasible, and has clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信