利用 "内容相似度测量(CSM)"算法检测网络健康误导信息并对其进行分类:一种基于事实核查的自动方法。

IF 2.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Journal of Supercomputing Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s11227-022-05032-y
Yashoda Barve, Jatinderkumar R Saini
{"title":"利用 \"内容相似度测量(CSM)\"算法检测网络健康误导信息并对其进行分类:一种基于事实核查的自动方法。","authors":"Yashoda Barve, Jatinderkumar R Saini","doi":"10.1007/s11227-022-05032-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Information dissemination occurs through the 'word of media' in the digital world. Fraudulent and deceitful content, such as misinformation, has detrimental effects on people. An implicit fact-based automated fact-checking technique comprising information retrieval, natural language processing, and machine learning techniques assist in assessing the credibility of content and detecting misinformation. Previous studies focused on linguistic and textual features and similarity measures-based approaches. However, these studies need to gain knowledge of facts, and similarity measures are less accurate when dealing with sparse or zero data. To fill these gaps, we propose a 'Content Similarity Measure (CSM)' algorithm that can perform automated fact-checking of URLs in the healthcare domain. Authors have introduced a novel set of content similarity, domain-specific, and sentiment polarity score features to achieve journalistic fact-checking. An extensive analysis of the proposed algorithm compared with standard similarity measures and machine learning classifiers showed that the 'content similarity score' feature outperformed other features with an accuracy of 88.26%. In the algorithmic approach, CSM showed improved accuracy of 91.06% compared to the Jaccard similarity measure with 74.26% accuracy. Another observation is that the algorithmic approach outperformed the feature-based method. To check the robustness of the algorithms, authors have tested the model on three state-of-the-art datasets, viz. CoAID, FakeHealth, and ReCOVery. With the algorithmic approach, CSM showed the highest accuracy of 87.30%, 89.30%, 85.26%, and 88.83% on CoAID, ReCOVery, FakeHealth (Story), and FakeHealth (Release) datasets, respectively. With a feature-based approach, the proposed CSM showed the highest accuracy of 85.93%, 87.97%, 83.92%, and 86.80%, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":50034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supercomputing","volume":"79 8","pages":"9127-9156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting and classifying online health misinformation with 'Content Similarity Measure (CSM)' algorithm: an automated fact-checking-based approach.\",\"authors\":\"Yashoda Barve, Jatinderkumar R Saini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11227-022-05032-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Information dissemination occurs through the 'word of media' in the digital world. Fraudulent and deceitful content, such as misinformation, has detrimental effects on people. An implicit fact-based automated fact-checking technique comprising information retrieval, natural language processing, and machine learning techniques assist in assessing the credibility of content and detecting misinformation. Previous studies focused on linguistic and textual features and similarity measures-based approaches. However, these studies need to gain knowledge of facts, and similarity measures are less accurate when dealing with sparse or zero data. To fill these gaps, we propose a 'Content Similarity Measure (CSM)' algorithm that can perform automated fact-checking of URLs in the healthcare domain. Authors have introduced a novel set of content similarity, domain-specific, and sentiment polarity score features to achieve journalistic fact-checking. An extensive analysis of the proposed algorithm compared with standard similarity measures and machine learning classifiers showed that the 'content similarity score' feature outperformed other features with an accuracy of 88.26%. In the algorithmic approach, CSM showed improved accuracy of 91.06% compared to the Jaccard similarity measure with 74.26% accuracy. Another observation is that the algorithmic approach outperformed the feature-based method. To check the robustness of the algorithms, authors have tested the model on three state-of-the-art datasets, viz. CoAID, FakeHealth, and ReCOVery. With the algorithmic approach, CSM showed the highest accuracy of 87.30%, 89.30%, 85.26%, and 88.83% on CoAID, ReCOVery, FakeHealth (Story), and FakeHealth (Release) datasets, respectively. With a feature-based approach, the proposed CSM showed the highest accuracy of 85.93%, 87.97%, 83.92%, and 86.80%, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Supercomputing\",\"volume\":\"79 8\",\"pages\":\"9127-9156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Supercomputing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-05032-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supercomputing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-05032-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信息传播是通过数字世界中的 "媒体语言 "进行的。虚假和欺骗性内容,如错误信息,会对人们产生有害影响。由信息检索、自然语言处理和机器学习技术组成的基于隐式事实的自动事实检查技术有助于评估内容的可信度和检测错误信息。以往的研究侧重于语言和文本特征以及基于相似性度量的方法。然而,这些研究需要获取事实知识,而且在处理稀疏数据或零数据时,相似性度量的准确性较低。为了填补这些空白,我们提出了一种 "内容相似性度量(CSM)"算法,可以对医疗保健领域的 URL 进行自动事实检查。作者引入了一组新颖的内容相似性、特定领域和情感极性得分特征,以实现新闻事实检查。对所提出的算法与标准相似性度量和机器学习分类器进行的广泛分析表明,"内容相似性得分 "特征的准确率高达 88.26%,优于其他特征。在算法方法中,CSM 的准确率提高了 91.06%,而 Jaccard 相似度测量的准确率为 74.26%。另一个观察结果是,算法方法优于基于特征的方法。为了检验算法的鲁棒性,作者在三个最先进的数据集(即 CoAID、FakeHealth 和 ReCOVery)上测试了模型。通过算法方法,CSM 在 CoAID、ReCOVery、FakeHealth(Story)和 FakeHealth(Release)数据集上分别显示出 87.30%、89.30%、85.26% 和 88.83% 的最高准确率。在基于特征的方法中,所提出的 CSM 的准确率最高,分别为 85.93%、87.97%、83.92% 和 86.80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Detecting and classifying online health misinformation with 'Content Similarity Measure (CSM)' algorithm: an automated fact-checking-based approach.

Detecting and classifying online health misinformation with 'Content Similarity Measure (CSM)' algorithm: an automated fact-checking-based approach.

Detecting and classifying online health misinformation with 'Content Similarity Measure (CSM)' algorithm: an automated fact-checking-based approach.

Detecting and classifying online health misinformation with 'Content Similarity Measure (CSM)' algorithm: an automated fact-checking-based approach.

Information dissemination occurs through the 'word of media' in the digital world. Fraudulent and deceitful content, such as misinformation, has detrimental effects on people. An implicit fact-based automated fact-checking technique comprising information retrieval, natural language processing, and machine learning techniques assist in assessing the credibility of content and detecting misinformation. Previous studies focused on linguistic and textual features and similarity measures-based approaches. However, these studies need to gain knowledge of facts, and similarity measures are less accurate when dealing with sparse or zero data. To fill these gaps, we propose a 'Content Similarity Measure (CSM)' algorithm that can perform automated fact-checking of URLs in the healthcare domain. Authors have introduced a novel set of content similarity, domain-specific, and sentiment polarity score features to achieve journalistic fact-checking. An extensive analysis of the proposed algorithm compared with standard similarity measures and machine learning classifiers showed that the 'content similarity score' feature outperformed other features with an accuracy of 88.26%. In the algorithmic approach, CSM showed improved accuracy of 91.06% compared to the Jaccard similarity measure with 74.26% accuracy. Another observation is that the algorithmic approach outperformed the feature-based method. To check the robustness of the algorithms, authors have tested the model on three state-of-the-art datasets, viz. CoAID, FakeHealth, and ReCOVery. With the algorithmic approach, CSM showed the highest accuracy of 87.30%, 89.30%, 85.26%, and 88.83% on CoAID, ReCOVery, FakeHealth (Story), and FakeHealth (Release) datasets, respectively. With a feature-based approach, the proposed CSM showed the highest accuracy of 85.93%, 87.97%, 83.92%, and 86.80%, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Supercomputing
Journal of Supercomputing 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.10%
发文量
734
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Supercomputing publishes papers on the technology, architecture and systems, algorithms, languages and programs, performance measures and methods, and applications of all aspects of Supercomputing. Tutorial and survey papers are intended for workers and students in the fields associated with and employing advanced computer systems. The journal also publishes letters to the editor, especially in areas relating to policy, succinct statements of paradoxes, intuitively puzzling results, partial results and real needs. Published theoretical and practical papers are advanced, in-depth treatments describing new developments and new ideas. Each includes an introduction summarizing prior, directly pertinent work that is useful for the reader to understand, in order to appreciate the advances being described.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信