虚拟参与环境研究的对象、内容和方式。

Socio-ecological practice research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s42532-023-00146-w
Jennifer M Holzer, Julia Baird, Gordon M Hickey
{"title":"虚拟参与环境研究的对象、内容和方式。","authors":"Jennifer M Holzer,&nbsp;Julia Baird,&nbsp;Gordon M Hickey","doi":"10.1007/s42532-023-00146-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a group of social scientists supporting a large, national, multi-site project dedicated to studying ecosystem services in natural resource production landscapes, we were tasked with co-hosting kick-off workshops at multiple locations. When, due to project design and the Covid-19 pandemic, we were forced to reshape our plans for these workshops and hold them online, we ended up changing our objectives. This redesign resulted in a new focus for our team-on the process of stakeholder and rightsholder engagement in environmental and sustainability research rather than the content of the workshops. Drawing on participant observation, surveys, and our professional experience, this perspective highlights lessons learned about organizing virtual stakeholder workshops to support landscape governance research and practice. We note that procedures followed for initiating stakeholder and rightsholder recruitment and engagement depend on the convenors' goals, although when multiple research teams are involved, the goals need to be negotiated. Further, more important than the robustness of engagement strategies is flexibility, feasibility, managing expectations-and keeping things simple.</p>","PeriodicalId":74830,"journal":{"name":"Socio-ecological practice research","volume":"5 2","pages":"221-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994392/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The who, what, and how of virtual participation in environmental research.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer M Holzer,&nbsp;Julia Baird,&nbsp;Gordon M Hickey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42532-023-00146-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As a group of social scientists supporting a large, national, multi-site project dedicated to studying ecosystem services in natural resource production landscapes, we were tasked with co-hosting kick-off workshops at multiple locations. When, due to project design and the Covid-19 pandemic, we were forced to reshape our plans for these workshops and hold them online, we ended up changing our objectives. This redesign resulted in a new focus for our team-on the process of stakeholder and rightsholder engagement in environmental and sustainability research rather than the content of the workshops. Drawing on participant observation, surveys, and our professional experience, this perspective highlights lessons learned about organizing virtual stakeholder workshops to support landscape governance research and practice. We note that procedures followed for initiating stakeholder and rightsholder recruitment and engagement depend on the convenors' goals, although when multiple research teams are involved, the goals need to be negotiated. Further, more important than the robustness of engagement strategies is flexibility, feasibility, managing expectations-and keeping things simple.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-ecological practice research\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"221-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994392/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-ecological practice research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-023-00146-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-ecological practice research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-023-00146-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为一个支持一个致力于研究自然资源生产景观中生态系统服务的大型国家多站点项目的社会科学家小组,我们的任务是在多个地点共同举办启动研讨会。由于项目设计和新冠肺炎疫情,我们被迫重新制定这些研讨会的计划并在网上举办,最终我们改变了目标。这一重新设计使我们的团队更加关注利益相关者和权利持有人参与环境和可持续性研究的过程,而不是研讨会的内容。根据参与者的观察、调查和我们的专业经验,这一观点强调了组织虚拟利益相关者研讨会以支持景观治理研究和实践的经验教训。我们注意到,启动利益相关者和权利持有人招聘和参与的程序取决于召集人的目标,尽管当涉及多个研究团队时,需要就目标进行谈判。此外,比参与策略的稳健性更重要的是灵活性、可行性、管理期望和保持简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The who, what, and how of virtual participation in environmental research.

The who, what, and how of virtual participation in environmental research.

The who, what, and how of virtual participation in environmental research.

The who, what, and how of virtual participation in environmental research.

As a group of social scientists supporting a large, national, multi-site project dedicated to studying ecosystem services in natural resource production landscapes, we were tasked with co-hosting kick-off workshops at multiple locations. When, due to project design and the Covid-19 pandemic, we were forced to reshape our plans for these workshops and hold them online, we ended up changing our objectives. This redesign resulted in a new focus for our team-on the process of stakeholder and rightsholder engagement in environmental and sustainability research rather than the content of the workshops. Drawing on participant observation, surveys, and our professional experience, this perspective highlights lessons learned about organizing virtual stakeholder workshops to support landscape governance research and practice. We note that procedures followed for initiating stakeholder and rightsholder recruitment and engagement depend on the convenors' goals, although when multiple research teams are involved, the goals need to be negotiated. Further, more important than the robustness of engagement strategies is flexibility, feasibility, managing expectations-and keeping things simple.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信