Joshua E Johnson, Marc J Brouillette, Benjamin J Miller, Jessica E Goetz
{"title":"具有转移性疾病的股骨的有限元模型计算力学行为在生理和理想载荷模拟之间的差异。","authors":"Joshua E Johnson, Marc J Brouillette, Benjamin J Miller, Jessica E Goetz","doi":"10.1177/11795972231166240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE models of femurs with MBD have implemented strain- and strength-based estimates of fracture risk under a wide variety of loading configurations, and \"physiologic\" loading models typically simulate a single abductor force. Due to these variations, it is currently difficult to interpret mechanical fracture risk results across studies of femoral MBD. Our aims were to evaluate (1) differences in mechanical behavior between idealized loading configurations and those incorporating physiologic muscle forces, and (2) differences in the rankings of mechanical behavior between different loading configurations, in FE simulations to predict fracture risk in femurs with MBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 9 different patient-specific FE loading simulations for a cohort of 54 MBD femurs: <i>strain outcome</i> simulations-physiologic (normal walking [NW], stair ascent [SA], stumbling), and joint contact only (NW contact force, excluding muscle forces); <i>strength outcome</i> simulations-physiologic (NW, SA), joint contact only, offset torsion, and sideways fall. Tensile principal strain and femur strength were compared between simulations using statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tensile principal strain was 26% higher (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.719, <i>P</i> < .001) and femur strength was 4% lower (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.984, <i>P</i> < .001) in simulations excluding physiologic muscle forces. Rankings of the mechanical predictions were correlated between the strain outcome simulations (ρ = 0.723 to 0.990, <i>P</i> < .001), and between strength outcome simulations (ρ = 0.524 to 0.984, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, simulations incorporating physiologic muscle forces affected local strain outcomes more than global strength outcomes. Absolute values of strain and strength computed using idealized (no muscle forces) and physiologic loading configurations should be used within the appropriate context when interpreting fracture risk in femurs with MBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":42484,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology","volume":"14 ","pages":"11795972231166240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/41/10.1177_11795972231166240.PMC10068135.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua E Johnson, Marc J Brouillette, Benjamin J Miller, Jessica E Goetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11795972231166240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE models of femurs with MBD have implemented strain- and strength-based estimates of fracture risk under a wide variety of loading configurations, and \\\"physiologic\\\" loading models typically simulate a single abductor force. Due to these variations, it is currently difficult to interpret mechanical fracture risk results across studies of femoral MBD. Our aims were to evaluate (1) differences in mechanical behavior between idealized loading configurations and those incorporating physiologic muscle forces, and (2) differences in the rankings of mechanical behavior between different loading configurations, in FE simulations to predict fracture risk in femurs with MBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 9 different patient-specific FE loading simulations for a cohort of 54 MBD femurs: <i>strain outcome</i> simulations-physiologic (normal walking [NW], stair ascent [SA], stumbling), and joint contact only (NW contact force, excluding muscle forces); <i>strength outcome</i> simulations-physiologic (NW, SA), joint contact only, offset torsion, and sideways fall. Tensile principal strain and femur strength were compared between simulations using statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tensile principal strain was 26% higher (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.719, <i>P</i> < .001) and femur strength was 4% lower (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.984, <i>P</i> < .001) in simulations excluding physiologic muscle forces. Rankings of the mechanical predictions were correlated between the strain outcome simulations (ρ = 0.723 to 0.990, <i>P</i> < .001), and between strength outcome simulations (ρ = 0.524 to 0.984, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, simulations incorporating physiologic muscle forces affected local strain outcomes more than global strength outcomes. Absolute values of strain and strength computed using idealized (no muscle forces) and physiologic loading configurations should be used within the appropriate context when interpreting fracture risk in femurs with MBD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"11795972231166240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/41/10.1177_11795972231166240.PMC10068135.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795972231166240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795972231166240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:由于临床认为骨折风险增加,受转移性骨病(MBD)影响的股骨经常接受手术以预防即将发生的病理性骨折。有限元模型可以提供更客观的断裂风险评估。然而,MBD股骨的有限元模型已经在各种载荷配置下实现了基于应变和强度的骨折风险估计,而“生理”载荷模型通常模拟单一外展力。由于这些差异,目前很难解释股骨MBD研究中的机械骨折风险结果。我们的目的是评估(1)在预测MBD股骨骨折风险的有限元模拟中,理想加载配置和结合生理肌肉力的力学行为的差异;(2)不同加载配置之间力学行为排名的差异。方法:我们对一组54 MBD股骨进行了9种不同的患者特异性FE负荷模拟:应变结果模拟-生理性(正常行走[NW],上楼梯[SA],绊倒)和仅关节接触(NW接触力,不包括肌肉力);强度结果模拟-生理性(西北方向,西南方向),仅关节接触,偏移扭转和侧落。通过统计分析比较了不同模拟间的拉伸主应变和股骨强度。结果:拉伸主应变高26% (r2 = 0.719, r2 = 0.984, P P P P)。结论:总体而言,结合生理性肌肉力量的模拟对局部应变结果的影响大于对整体强度结果的影响。在解释MBD股骨骨折风险时,应在适当的背景下使用理想(无肌肉力)和生理负荷配置计算的应变和强度绝对值。
Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations.
Background and objectives: Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE models of femurs with MBD have implemented strain- and strength-based estimates of fracture risk under a wide variety of loading configurations, and "physiologic" loading models typically simulate a single abductor force. Due to these variations, it is currently difficult to interpret mechanical fracture risk results across studies of femoral MBD. Our aims were to evaluate (1) differences in mechanical behavior between idealized loading configurations and those incorporating physiologic muscle forces, and (2) differences in the rankings of mechanical behavior between different loading configurations, in FE simulations to predict fracture risk in femurs with MBD.
Methods: We evaluated 9 different patient-specific FE loading simulations for a cohort of 54 MBD femurs: strain outcome simulations-physiologic (normal walking [NW], stair ascent [SA], stumbling), and joint contact only (NW contact force, excluding muscle forces); strength outcome simulations-physiologic (NW, SA), joint contact only, offset torsion, and sideways fall. Tensile principal strain and femur strength were compared between simulations using statistical analyses.
Results: Tensile principal strain was 26% higher (R2 = 0.719, P < .001) and femur strength was 4% lower (R2 = 0.984, P < .001) in simulations excluding physiologic muscle forces. Rankings of the mechanical predictions were correlated between the strain outcome simulations (ρ = 0.723 to 0.990, P < .001), and between strength outcome simulations (ρ = 0.524 to 0.984, P < .001).
Conclusions: Overall, simulations incorporating physiologic muscle forces affected local strain outcomes more than global strength outcomes. Absolute values of strain and strength computed using idealized (no muscle forces) and physiologic loading configurations should be used within the appropriate context when interpreting fracture risk in femurs with MBD.