亚胺培南/瑞巴坦对西班牙肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的活性研究。智能2016 - 2020。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S García-Fernández, J Calvo, E Cercenado, A I Suárez-Barrenechea, M Fernández-Billón, F J Castillo, L Gálvez-Benítez, F Tubau, R E Figueroa Cerón, A Hernández-Cabezas, F González Romo, M C Fariñas, M Gómez, J Díaz-Regañón, R Cantón
{"title":"亚胺培南/瑞巴坦对西班牙肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的活性研究。智能2016 - 2020。","authors":"S García-Fernández,&nbsp;J Calvo,&nbsp;E Cercenado,&nbsp;A I Suárez-Barrenechea,&nbsp;M Fernández-Billón,&nbsp;F J Castillo,&nbsp;L Gálvez-Benítez,&nbsp;F Tubau,&nbsp;R E Figueroa Cerón,&nbsp;A Hernández-Cabezas,&nbsp;F González Romo,&nbsp;M C Fariñas,&nbsp;M Gómez,&nbsp;J Díaz-Regañón,&nbsp;R Cantón","doi":"10.37201/req/007.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine susceptibility to the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination imipenem/relebactam in clinical isolates recovered from intra-abdominal (IAI), urinary (UTI), respiratory (RTI) and bloodstream (BSI) infections in the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) study in SPAIN during 2016 - 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Broth microdilution MICs for imipenem/relebactam and comparators were determined by a central laboratory against isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MICs were interpreted using EUCAST-2021 breakpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5,210 Enterobacterales and 1,418 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were analyzed. Imipenem/relebactam inhibited 98.8% of Enterobacterales. Distinguishing by source of infection susceptibility was 99.1% in BSI, 99.2% in IAI, 97.9% in RTI, and 99.2% in UTI. Of intensive care unit isolates (ICU) 97.4% were susceptible and of non-ICU isolates 99.2% were susceptible. In Enterobacterales, activity against Class A, Class B and Class D carbapenemases was 96.2%, 15.4% and 73.2%, respectively. In P. aeruginosa, imipenem/relebactam was active in 92.2% of isolates. By source of infection it was 94.8% in BSI, 92.9% in IAI, 91.7% in RTI, and 93.1% in UTI. An 88.7% of ICU isolates and 93.6% of non-ICU isolates were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam. Imipenem/relebactam remained active against P. aeruginosa ceftazidime-resistant (76.3%), cefepime-resistant (73.6%), imipenem-resistant (71.5%) and piperacillin-resistant (78.7%) isolates. Of all multidrug-resistant or difficult-to-treat resistance P. aeruginosa isolates, 75.1% and 46.2%, respectively, were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Imipenem/relebactam showed high rates of susceptibility in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates from different sources of infection as well as depending on patients' location (ICU or non-ICU scenarios).</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/eb/1e/revespquimioter-36-302.PMC10238800.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Activity of imipenem/relebactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Spain. SMART 2016-2020.\",\"authors\":\"S García-Fernández,&nbsp;J Calvo,&nbsp;E Cercenado,&nbsp;A I Suárez-Barrenechea,&nbsp;M Fernández-Billón,&nbsp;F J Castillo,&nbsp;L Gálvez-Benítez,&nbsp;F Tubau,&nbsp;R E Figueroa Cerón,&nbsp;A Hernández-Cabezas,&nbsp;F González Romo,&nbsp;M C Fariñas,&nbsp;M Gómez,&nbsp;J Díaz-Regañón,&nbsp;R Cantón\",\"doi\":\"10.37201/req/007.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine susceptibility to the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination imipenem/relebactam in clinical isolates recovered from intra-abdominal (IAI), urinary (UTI), respiratory (RTI) and bloodstream (BSI) infections in the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) study in SPAIN during 2016 - 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Broth microdilution MICs for imipenem/relebactam and comparators were determined by a central laboratory against isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MICs were interpreted using EUCAST-2021 breakpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5,210 Enterobacterales and 1,418 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were analyzed. Imipenem/relebactam inhibited 98.8% of Enterobacterales. Distinguishing by source of infection susceptibility was 99.1% in BSI, 99.2% in IAI, 97.9% in RTI, and 99.2% in UTI. Of intensive care unit isolates (ICU) 97.4% were susceptible and of non-ICU isolates 99.2% were susceptible. In Enterobacterales, activity against Class A, Class B and Class D carbapenemases was 96.2%, 15.4% and 73.2%, respectively. In P. aeruginosa, imipenem/relebactam was active in 92.2% of isolates. By source of infection it was 94.8% in BSI, 92.9% in IAI, 91.7% in RTI, and 93.1% in UTI. An 88.7% of ICU isolates and 93.6% of non-ICU isolates were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam. Imipenem/relebactam remained active against P. aeruginosa ceftazidime-resistant (76.3%), cefepime-resistant (73.6%), imipenem-resistant (71.5%) and piperacillin-resistant (78.7%) isolates. Of all multidrug-resistant or difficult-to-treat resistance P. aeruginosa isolates, 75.1% and 46.2%, respectively, were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Imipenem/relebactam showed high rates of susceptibility in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates from different sources of infection as well as depending on patients' location (ICU or non-ICU scenarios).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/eb/1e/revespquimioter-36-302.PMC10238800.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/007.2023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/007.2023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在2016 - 2020年西班牙SMART(抗菌药物耐药趋势监测研究)研究中,确定从腹腔(IAI)、泌尿(UTI)、呼吸道(RTI)和血液(BSI)感染中分离的临床分离株对新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合亚胺培南/乐巴坦的敏感性。方法:亚胺培南/瑞巴坦及其比较物的肉汤微量稀释mic由中心实验室对分离的肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌进行测定。mic使用EUCAST-2021断点进行解释。结果:共检出肠杆菌5210株,铜绿假单胞菌1418株。亚胺培南/瑞巴坦对肠杆菌的抑制率为98.8%。BSI、IAI、RTI和UTI的易感性分别为99.1%、99.2%、97.9%和99.2%。重症监护病房(ICU)分离株97.4%敏感,非ICU分离株99.2%敏感。对A类、B类和D类碳青霉烯酶的活性分别为96.2%、15.4%和73.2%。在铜绿假单胞菌中,亚胺培南/瑞巴坦在92.2%的分离株中有活性。按感染源划分,BSI为94.8%,IAI为92.9%,RTI为91.7%,UTI为93.1%。88.7%的ICU分离株和93.6%的非ICU分离株对亚胺培南/瑞巴坦敏感。亚胺培南/瑞巴坦对铜绿假单胞菌头孢他啶耐药(76.3%)、头孢吡肟耐药(73.6%)、亚胺培南耐药(71.5%)和哌拉西林耐药(78.7%)仍有活性。在所有耐多药或难以治疗的铜绿假单胞菌分离株中,分别有75.1%和46.2%对亚胺培南/瑞巴坦敏感。结论:亚胺培南/瑞巴坦对不同感染源的肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌以及不同患者位置(ICU或非ICU)的分离株均有较高的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Activity of imipenem/relebactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Spain. SMART 2016-2020.

Activity of imipenem/relebactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Spain. SMART 2016-2020.

Objective: To determine susceptibility to the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination imipenem/relebactam in clinical isolates recovered from intra-abdominal (IAI), urinary (UTI), respiratory (RTI) and bloodstream (BSI) infections in the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) study in SPAIN during 2016 - 2020.

Methods: Broth microdilution MICs for imipenem/relebactam and comparators were determined by a central laboratory against isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MICs were interpreted using EUCAST-2021 breakpoints.

Results: In total, 5,210 Enterobacterales and 1,418 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were analyzed. Imipenem/relebactam inhibited 98.8% of Enterobacterales. Distinguishing by source of infection susceptibility was 99.1% in BSI, 99.2% in IAI, 97.9% in RTI, and 99.2% in UTI. Of intensive care unit isolates (ICU) 97.4% were susceptible and of non-ICU isolates 99.2% were susceptible. In Enterobacterales, activity against Class A, Class B and Class D carbapenemases was 96.2%, 15.4% and 73.2%, respectively. In P. aeruginosa, imipenem/relebactam was active in 92.2% of isolates. By source of infection it was 94.8% in BSI, 92.9% in IAI, 91.7% in RTI, and 93.1% in UTI. An 88.7% of ICU isolates and 93.6% of non-ICU isolates were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam. Imipenem/relebactam remained active against P. aeruginosa ceftazidime-resistant (76.3%), cefepime-resistant (73.6%), imipenem-resistant (71.5%) and piperacillin-resistant (78.7%) isolates. Of all multidrug-resistant or difficult-to-treat resistance P. aeruginosa isolates, 75.1% and 46.2%, respectively, were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam.

Conclusions: Imipenem/relebactam showed high rates of susceptibility in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates from different sources of infection as well as depending on patients' location (ICU or non-ICU scenarios).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信