量化策略,以最大限度地减少气溶胶在牙科诊所的扩散。

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Shamudra Dey, Maryam Tunio, Louis C Boryc, Brian D Hodgson, Guilherme J M Garcia
{"title":"量化策略,以最大限度地减少气溶胶在牙科诊所的扩散。","authors":"Shamudra Dey,&nbsp;Maryam Tunio,&nbsp;Louis C Boryc,&nbsp;Brian D Hodgson,&nbsp;Guilherme J M Garcia","doi":"10.1007/s42757-022-0157-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many dental procedures are aerosol-generating and pose a risk for the spread of airborne diseases, including COVID-19. Several aerosol mitigation strategies are available to reduce aerosol dispersion in dental clinics, such as increasing room ventilation and using extra-oral suction devices and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units. However, many questions remain unanswered, including what the optimal device flow rate is and how long after a patient exits the room it is safe to start treatment of the next patient. This study used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to quantify the effectiveness of room ventilation, an HEPA filtration unit, and two extra-oral suction devices to reduce aerosols in a dental clinic. Aerosol concentration was quantified as the particulate matter under 10 µm (PM<sub>10</sub>) using the particle size distribution generated during dental drilling. The simulations considered a 15 min procedure followed by a 30 min resting period. The efficiency of aerosol mitigation strategies was quantified by the scrubbing time, defined as the amount of time required to remove 95% of the aerosol released during the dental procedure. When no aerosol mitigation strategy was applied, PM<sub>10</sub> reached 30 µg/m<sup>3</sup> after 15 min of dental drilling, and then declined gradually to 0.2 µg/m<sup>3</sup> at the end of the resting period. The scrubbing time decreased from 20 to 5 min when the room ventilation increased from 6.3 to 18 air changes per hour (ACH), and decreased from 10 to 1 min when the flow rate of the HEPA filtration unit increased from 8 to 20 ACH. The CFD simulations also predicted that the extra-oral suction devices would capture 100% of the particles emanating from the patient's mouth for device flow rates above 400 L/min. In summary, this study demonstrates that aerosol mitigation strategies can effectively reduce aerosol concentrations in dental clinics, which is expected to reduce the risk of spreading COVID-19 and other airborne diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":53125,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042415/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying strategies to minimize aerosol dispersion in dental clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Shamudra Dey,&nbsp;Maryam Tunio,&nbsp;Louis C Boryc,&nbsp;Brian D Hodgson,&nbsp;Guilherme J M Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42757-022-0157-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many dental procedures are aerosol-generating and pose a risk for the spread of airborne diseases, including COVID-19. Several aerosol mitigation strategies are available to reduce aerosol dispersion in dental clinics, such as increasing room ventilation and using extra-oral suction devices and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units. However, many questions remain unanswered, including what the optimal device flow rate is and how long after a patient exits the room it is safe to start treatment of the next patient. This study used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to quantify the effectiveness of room ventilation, an HEPA filtration unit, and two extra-oral suction devices to reduce aerosols in a dental clinic. Aerosol concentration was quantified as the particulate matter under 10 µm (PM<sub>10</sub>) using the particle size distribution generated during dental drilling. The simulations considered a 15 min procedure followed by a 30 min resting period. The efficiency of aerosol mitigation strategies was quantified by the scrubbing time, defined as the amount of time required to remove 95% of the aerosol released during the dental procedure. When no aerosol mitigation strategy was applied, PM<sub>10</sub> reached 30 µg/m<sup>3</sup> after 15 min of dental drilling, and then declined gradually to 0.2 µg/m<sup>3</sup> at the end of the resting period. The scrubbing time decreased from 20 to 5 min when the room ventilation increased from 6.3 to 18 air changes per hour (ACH), and decreased from 10 to 1 min when the flow rate of the HEPA filtration unit increased from 8 to 20 ACH. The CFD simulations also predicted that the extra-oral suction devices would capture 100% of the particles emanating from the patient's mouth for device flow rates above 400 L/min. In summary, this study demonstrates that aerosol mitigation strategies can effectively reduce aerosol concentrations in dental clinics, which is expected to reduce the risk of spreading COVID-19 and other airborne diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042415/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-022-0157-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-022-0157-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

许多牙科手术都是气溶胶生成的,并对包括新冠肺炎在内的空气传播疾病构成风险。有几种气溶胶缓解策略可用于减少牙科诊所的气溶胶扩散,例如增加房间通风,使用额外的口腔抽吸设备和高效微粒空气(HEPA)过滤装置。然而,许多问题仍未得到解答,包括最佳设备流速是多少,以及患者离开房间后多久才能安全地开始治疗下一位患者。这项研究使用计算流体动力学(CFD)来量化牙科诊所房间通风、高效空气过滤器过滤装置和两个额外的口腔抽吸装置的有效性,以减少气溶胶。气溶胶浓度量化为10µm以下的颗粒物(PM10),使用牙科钻孔过程中产生的颗粒尺寸分布。模拟考虑了15分钟的程序,然后是30分钟的休息期。气溶胶缓解策略的效率通过擦洗时间来量化,擦洗时间定义为去除牙科手术期间释放的95%气溶胶所需的时间。当不采用气溶胶缓解策略时,牙钻15分钟后,PM10达到30µg/m3,然后在休息期结束时逐渐下降至0.2µg/m3。当房间通风量从每小时6.3次增加到18次换气(ACH)时,洗涤时间从20分钟减少到5分钟,当HEPA过滤单元的流速从8次增加到20次ACH时,洗涤次数从10分钟减少到1分钟。CFD模拟还预测,当装置流速超过400L/min时,额外的口腔抽吸装置将捕获100%从患者口腔排出的颗粒。总之,这项研究表明,气溶胶缓解策略可以有效降低牙科诊所的气溶胶浓度,有望降低新冠肺炎和其他空气传播疾病的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantifying strategies to minimize aerosol dispersion in dental clinics.

Quantifying strategies to minimize aerosol dispersion in dental clinics.

Many dental procedures are aerosol-generating and pose a risk for the spread of airborne diseases, including COVID-19. Several aerosol mitigation strategies are available to reduce aerosol dispersion in dental clinics, such as increasing room ventilation and using extra-oral suction devices and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units. However, many questions remain unanswered, including what the optimal device flow rate is and how long after a patient exits the room it is safe to start treatment of the next patient. This study used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to quantify the effectiveness of room ventilation, an HEPA filtration unit, and two extra-oral suction devices to reduce aerosols in a dental clinic. Aerosol concentration was quantified as the particulate matter under 10 µm (PM10) using the particle size distribution generated during dental drilling. The simulations considered a 15 min procedure followed by a 30 min resting period. The efficiency of aerosol mitigation strategies was quantified by the scrubbing time, defined as the amount of time required to remove 95% of the aerosol released during the dental procedure. When no aerosol mitigation strategy was applied, PM10 reached 30 µg/m3 after 15 min of dental drilling, and then declined gradually to 0.2 µg/m3 at the end of the resting period. The scrubbing time decreased from 20 to 5 min when the room ventilation increased from 6.3 to 18 air changes per hour (ACH), and decreased from 10 to 1 min when the flow rate of the HEPA filtration unit increased from 8 to 20 ACH. The CFD simulations also predicted that the extra-oral suction devices would capture 100% of the particles emanating from the patient's mouth for device flow rates above 400 L/min. In summary, this study demonstrates that aerosol mitigation strategies can effectively reduce aerosol concentrations in dental clinics, which is expected to reduce the risk of spreading COVID-19 and other airborne diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
32.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow is a peer-reviewed international academic journal that publishes research papers and significant review articles on multiphase flows. Focuses on transport phenomena of mass, momentum, and heat from theoretical, experimental, and computational perspectives. Publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles, brief communications, letters, and comments on previously published papers. Covers a broad scope including interface interaction, multiphase dynamics, heat transfers, phase changes, and more. Fields of application include nuclear, chemical, petroleum, environmental, mineral, pharmaceutical, bio-mechanical, and mechanical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信