多中心研究:利用多层胸部计算机断层扫描片对冠状动脉钙化进行简单评估的可行性。

IF 0.6 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Hideya Yamamoto, Shinichiro Fujimoto, Chihiro Aoshima, Tohru Minamino, Takashi Fujii, Shinichi Wakabayashi, Yoji Urabe, Hironori Ueda, Eiji Kunita, Mitsunori Abe, Hiroshi Higashino
{"title":"多中心研究:利用多层胸部计算机断层扫描片对冠状动脉钙化进行简单评估的可行性。","authors":"Hideya Yamamoto,&nbsp;Shinichiro Fujimoto,&nbsp;Chihiro Aoshima,&nbsp;Tohru Minamino,&nbsp;Takashi Fujii,&nbsp;Shinichi Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Yoji Urabe,&nbsp;Hironori Ueda,&nbsp;Eiji Kunita,&nbsp;Mitsunori Abe,&nbsp;Hiroshi Higashino","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.22-00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> We aimed to evaluate the visual measurements of coronary artery calcium (CAC) on nonelectrocardiogram (ECG)-gated chest computed tomography (CT) using a simple scoring method that involves counting the number of CT slices containing CAC. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We analyzed 163 participants who underwent both coronary and chest CT examinations at six centers within 3 months. Agatston scores were calculated on standard ECG-gated scans and classified as none (0), mild (1-99), moderate (100-400), or severe (>400). Next, chest CT images were reconstructed to standard 5.0 mm axial slices. Then, CAC on chest CT scans was measured using two methods: the Weston score (sum of the assigned score of each vessel, range: 0-12) and number of slices showing CAC (Ca-slice#). <b>Results:</b> When the Weston score and Ca-slice# were divided into four levels according to the optimal divisional levels corresponding to the Agatston score classes, good agreements with the 4-grade Agatston score were observed (kappa value=0.610 and 0.794, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of Ca-slice# ≥9 to identify severe Agatston scores of >400 were 86% and 96%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Ca-slice#, a simple scoring method using chest CT scans, was in good agreement with the ECG-gated Agatston score.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"16 1","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/1c/avd-16-1-oa.22-00060.PMC10064303.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Simple Evaluation of Coronary Artery Calcium Using a Number of Chest Computed Tomography Slices: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hideya Yamamoto,&nbsp;Shinichiro Fujimoto,&nbsp;Chihiro Aoshima,&nbsp;Tohru Minamino,&nbsp;Takashi Fujii,&nbsp;Shinichi Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Yoji Urabe,&nbsp;Hironori Ueda,&nbsp;Eiji Kunita,&nbsp;Mitsunori Abe,&nbsp;Hiroshi Higashino\",\"doi\":\"10.3400/avd.oa.22-00060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> We aimed to evaluate the visual measurements of coronary artery calcium (CAC) on nonelectrocardiogram (ECG)-gated chest computed tomography (CT) using a simple scoring method that involves counting the number of CT slices containing CAC. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We analyzed 163 participants who underwent both coronary and chest CT examinations at six centers within 3 months. Agatston scores were calculated on standard ECG-gated scans and classified as none (0), mild (1-99), moderate (100-400), or severe (>400). Next, chest CT images were reconstructed to standard 5.0 mm axial slices. Then, CAC on chest CT scans was measured using two methods: the Weston score (sum of the assigned score of each vessel, range: 0-12) and number of slices showing CAC (Ca-slice#). <b>Results:</b> When the Weston score and Ca-slice# were divided into four levels according to the optimal divisional levels corresponding to the Agatston score classes, good agreements with the 4-grade Agatston score were observed (kappa value=0.610 and 0.794, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of Ca-slice# ≥9 to identify severe Agatston scores of >400 were 86% and 96%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Ca-slice#, a simple scoring method using chest CT scans, was in good agreement with the ECG-gated Agatston score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"46-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/1c/avd-16-1-oa.22-00060.PMC10064303.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.22-00060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.22-00060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在评估非心电图门控胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)上冠状动脉钙(CAC)的视觉测量,使用一种简单的评分方法,包括计算含有CAC的CT切片的数量。材料和方法:我们分析了163名参与者,他们在3个月内在6个中心接受了冠状动脉和胸部CT检查。在标准心电图门控扫描上计算Agatston评分,并将其分为无(0)、轻度(1-99)、中度(100-400)或重度(>400)。接下来,将胸部CT图像重建为标准的5.0 mm轴向切片。然后,使用两种方法测量胸部CT扫描上的CAC: Weston评分(每个血管分配评分的总和,范围:0-12)和显示CAC的切片数(ca切片#)。结果:将Weston评分和Ca-slice#按Agatston评分类别对应的最优划分水平分为4个等级,与4级Agatston评分吻合较好(kappa值分别为0.610和0.794)。Ca-slice#≥9对>400的重度Agatston评分的敏感性和特异性分别为86%和96%。结论:Ca-slice#是一种简单的胸部CT评分方法,与ecg门控Agatston评分吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility of Simple Evaluation of Coronary Artery Calcium Using a Number of Chest Computed Tomography Slices: A Multicenter Study.

Feasibility of Simple Evaluation of Coronary Artery Calcium Using a Number of Chest Computed Tomography Slices: A Multicenter Study.

Feasibility of Simple Evaluation of Coronary Artery Calcium Using a Number of Chest Computed Tomography Slices: A Multicenter Study.

Feasibility of Simple Evaluation of Coronary Artery Calcium Using a Number of Chest Computed Tomography Slices: A Multicenter Study.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the visual measurements of coronary artery calcium (CAC) on nonelectrocardiogram (ECG)-gated chest computed tomography (CT) using a simple scoring method that involves counting the number of CT slices containing CAC. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 163 participants who underwent both coronary and chest CT examinations at six centers within 3 months. Agatston scores were calculated on standard ECG-gated scans and classified as none (0), mild (1-99), moderate (100-400), or severe (>400). Next, chest CT images were reconstructed to standard 5.0 mm axial slices. Then, CAC on chest CT scans was measured using two methods: the Weston score (sum of the assigned score of each vessel, range: 0-12) and number of slices showing CAC (Ca-slice#). Results: When the Weston score and Ca-slice# were divided into four levels according to the optimal divisional levels corresponding to the Agatston score classes, good agreements with the 4-grade Agatston score were observed (kappa value=0.610 and 0.794, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of Ca-slice# ≥9 to identify severe Agatston scores of >400 were 86% and 96%, respectively. Conclusion: The Ca-slice#, a simple scoring method using chest CT scans, was in good agreement with the ECG-gated Agatston score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of vascular diseases
Annals of vascular diseases PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信