活在过程中:检视提华纳社区康复中心强制与照护的连续性。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Culture Medicine and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1007/s11013-023-09822-8
Ellen E Kozelka
{"title":"活在过程中:检视提华纳社区康复中心强制与照护的连续性。","authors":"Ellen E Kozelka","doi":"10.1007/s11013-023-09822-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Mexico, community-based, non-biomedical treatment models for substance use are legally recognized in national drug policy, monitored by state-level Departments of Health, and in some cases publicly funded. Academic research on centers that utilize these forms of treatment have focused primarily on documenting their rapid spread and describing their institutional practices, particularly human rights abuses and lack of established biomedical efficacy. In Tijuana, these community-based therapeutic models are shaped by conceptions of health and illness from the local cultural context of the United States-Mexico border zone in ways that do not cleanly match western, biomedical notions of the illness \"addiction.\" In this article, I examine treatment ethics by exploring the contextually understood need for coerced treatment (i.e., why centers are locked) along with experiences of compulsion in a women's 12 Step center. These discussions highlight the contested therapeutic value of coercion from multiple perspectives. Utilizing engaged listening around local care practices marks a path for global mental health researchers to understand and sit with difference in order to communicate across opposing viewpoints in the service of mental health equity and best care practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47634,"journal":{"name":"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"937-960"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Living the Process: Examining the Continuum of Coercion and Care in Tijuana's Community-Based Rehabilitation Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen E Kozelka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11013-023-09822-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Mexico, community-based, non-biomedical treatment models for substance use are legally recognized in national drug policy, monitored by state-level Departments of Health, and in some cases publicly funded. Academic research on centers that utilize these forms of treatment have focused primarily on documenting their rapid spread and describing their institutional practices, particularly human rights abuses and lack of established biomedical efficacy. In Tijuana, these community-based therapeutic models are shaped by conceptions of health and illness from the local cultural context of the United States-Mexico border zone in ways that do not cleanly match western, biomedical notions of the illness \\\"addiction.\\\" In this article, I examine treatment ethics by exploring the contextually understood need for coerced treatment (i.e., why centers are locked) along with experiences of compulsion in a women's 12 Step center. These discussions highlight the contested therapeutic value of coercion from multiple perspectives. Utilizing engaged listening around local care practices marks a path for global mental health researchers to understand and sit with difference in order to communicate across opposing viewpoints in the service of mental health equity and best care practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"937-960\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-023-09822-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-023-09822-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在墨西哥,以社区为基础的药物使用非生物医学治疗模式在国家药物政策中得到法律承认,由州级卫生部门进行监测,在某些情况下还得到公共资助。关于使用这些治疗形式的中心的学术研究主要集中在记录其迅速传播和描述其机构做法,特别是侵犯人权和缺乏确定的生物医学疗效。在蒂华纳,这些以社区为基础的治疗模式是由美国-墨西哥边境地区当地文化背景下的健康和疾病概念所塑造的,与西方生物医学对疾病“成瘾”的概念并不完全相符。在这篇文章中,我通过探索强制治疗的语境理解需求(即,为什么中心被锁定)以及在女性12步中心的强迫经验来检查治疗伦理。这些讨论从多个角度突出了胁迫的有争议的治疗价值。在当地护理实践中利用参与式倾听标志着全球精神卫生研究人员理解和接受差异的途径,以便在精神卫生公平和最佳护理实践的服务中跨越对立观点进行沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Living the Process: Examining the Continuum of Coercion and Care in Tijuana's Community-Based Rehabilitation Centers.

In Mexico, community-based, non-biomedical treatment models for substance use are legally recognized in national drug policy, monitored by state-level Departments of Health, and in some cases publicly funded. Academic research on centers that utilize these forms of treatment have focused primarily on documenting their rapid spread and describing their institutional practices, particularly human rights abuses and lack of established biomedical efficacy. In Tijuana, these community-based therapeutic models are shaped by conceptions of health and illness from the local cultural context of the United States-Mexico border zone in ways that do not cleanly match western, biomedical notions of the illness "addiction." In this article, I examine treatment ethics by exploring the contextually understood need for coerced treatment (i.e., why centers are locked) along with experiences of compulsion in a women's 12 Step center. These discussions highlight the contested therapeutic value of coercion from multiple perspectives. Utilizing engaged listening around local care practices marks a path for global mental health researchers to understand and sit with difference in order to communicate across opposing viewpoints in the service of mental health equity and best care practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry is an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication of work in three interrelated fields: medical and psychiatric anthropology, cross-cultural psychiatry, and related cross-societal and clinical epidemiological studies. The journal publishes original research, and theoretical papers based on original research, on all subjects in each of these fields. Interdisciplinary work which bridges anthropological and medical perspectives and methods which are clinically relevant are particularly welcome, as is research on the cultural context of normative and deviant behavior, including the anthropological, epidemiological and clinical aspects of the subject. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry also fosters systematic and wide-ranging examinations of the significance of culture in health care, including comparisons of how the concept of culture is operationalized in anthropological and medical disciplines. With the increasing emphasis on the cultural diversity of society, which finds its reflection in many facets of our day to day life, including health care, Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry is required reading in anthropology, psychiatry and general health care libraries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信