光学相干断层扫描评估眶动脉粥样硬化切除术后冠状动脉损伤的预测因素。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tetsumin Lee, Takashi Ashikaga, Toshihiro Nozato, Masakazu Kaneko, Ryoichi Miyazaki, Shinichiro Okata, Masashi Nagase, Tomoki Horie, Mao Terui, Tetsuya Kishigami, Yasutoshi Nagata, Toru Misawa, Yuta Taomoto, Daigo Kachi, Michihito Naito, Taishi Yonetsu, Tetsuo Sasano
{"title":"光学相干断层扫描评估眶动脉粥样硬化切除术后冠状动脉损伤的预测因素。","authors":"Tetsumin Lee,&nbsp;Takashi Ashikaga,&nbsp;Toshihiro Nozato,&nbsp;Masakazu Kaneko,&nbsp;Ryoichi Miyazaki,&nbsp;Shinichiro Okata,&nbsp;Masashi Nagase,&nbsp;Tomoki Horie,&nbsp;Mao Terui,&nbsp;Tetsuya Kishigami,&nbsp;Yasutoshi Nagata,&nbsp;Toru Misawa,&nbsp;Yuta Taomoto,&nbsp;Daigo Kachi,&nbsp;Michihito Naito,&nbsp;Taishi Yonetsu,&nbsp;Tetsuo Sasano","doi":"10.1007/s10554-023-02837-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The association between the extent of the wire and device bias as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the healthy portion of the vessel and the risk of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy (OA) has not been fully elucidated. Thus, purpose of this study is to investigate the association between pre-OA OCT findings and post-OA coronary artery injury by OCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 148 de novo lesions having calcified lesion required OA (max Ca angle > 90°) in 135 patients who underwent both pre- and post-OA OCT. In pre-OA OCT, OCT catheter contact angle and the presence or absences of guide-wire (GW) contact with the normal vessel intima were assessed. Also, in post-OA OCT, we assessed there was post-OA coronary artery injury (OA injury), defined as disappearance of both of intima and medial wall of normal vessel, or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OA injury was found in 19 lesions (13%). Pre-PCI OCT catheter contact angle with the normal coronary artery was significantly larger (median 137°; inter quartile range [IQR] 113-169 vs. median 0°; IQR 0-0, P < 0.001) and more GW contact with the normal vessel was found (63% vs. 8%, P < 0.001). Pre-PCI OCT catheter contact angle > 92° and GW contact with the normal vessel intima were associated with post-OA vascular injury (Both: 92% (11/12), Either: 32% (8/25), Neither: 0% (0/111), P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-PCI OCT findings, such as catheter contact angle > 92° and guide-wire contact to the normal coronary artery, were associated with post-OA coronary artery injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50332,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"39 7","pages":"1367-1374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy as assessed by optical coherence tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Tetsumin Lee,&nbsp;Takashi Ashikaga,&nbsp;Toshihiro Nozato,&nbsp;Masakazu Kaneko,&nbsp;Ryoichi Miyazaki,&nbsp;Shinichiro Okata,&nbsp;Masashi Nagase,&nbsp;Tomoki Horie,&nbsp;Mao Terui,&nbsp;Tetsuya Kishigami,&nbsp;Yasutoshi Nagata,&nbsp;Toru Misawa,&nbsp;Yuta Taomoto,&nbsp;Daigo Kachi,&nbsp;Michihito Naito,&nbsp;Taishi Yonetsu,&nbsp;Tetsuo Sasano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-023-02837-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The association between the extent of the wire and device bias as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the healthy portion of the vessel and the risk of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy (OA) has not been fully elucidated. Thus, purpose of this study is to investigate the association between pre-OA OCT findings and post-OA coronary artery injury by OCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 148 de novo lesions having calcified lesion required OA (max Ca angle > 90°) in 135 patients who underwent both pre- and post-OA OCT. In pre-OA OCT, OCT catheter contact angle and the presence or absences of guide-wire (GW) contact with the normal vessel intima were assessed. Also, in post-OA OCT, we assessed there was post-OA coronary artery injury (OA injury), defined as disappearance of both of intima and medial wall of normal vessel, or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OA injury was found in 19 lesions (13%). Pre-PCI OCT catheter contact angle with the normal coronary artery was significantly larger (median 137°; inter quartile range [IQR] 113-169 vs. median 0°; IQR 0-0, P < 0.001) and more GW contact with the normal vessel was found (63% vs. 8%, P < 0.001). Pre-PCI OCT catheter contact angle > 92° and GW contact with the normal vessel intima were associated with post-OA vascular injury (Both: 92% (11/12), Either: 32% (8/25), Neither: 0% (0/111), P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-PCI OCT findings, such as catheter contact angle > 92° and guide-wire contact to the normal coronary artery, were associated with post-OA coronary artery injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"39 7\",\"pages\":\"1367-1374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250457/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02837-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02837-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估血管健康部分的金属丝和器械偏置范围与眶动脉粥样硬化切除术(OA)后冠状动脉损伤风险之间的关系尚未完全阐明。因此,本研究的目的是探讨OA前OCT结果与OA后冠状动脉损伤之间的关系。方法:我们在135例OA前和OA后OCT患者中招募了148例新发病变,这些病变有钙化病变,需要OA(最大Ca角> 90°)。在OA前OCT中,评估了OCT导管接触角和导丝(GW)与正常血管内膜的接触。此外,在OA后的OCT中,我们评估了OA后冠状动脉损伤(OA损伤),定义为正常血管内膜和内侧壁的消失,或没有。结果:OA损伤19例(13%)。pci前OCT导管与正常冠状动脉接触角明显增大(中位137°;四分位数间距[IQR] 113-169,中位数0°;IQR 0-0, p92°和GW与正常血管内膜接触与oa后血管损伤相关(两者均为92%(11/12),两者均为32%(8/25),两者均为0%(0/111)。结论:pci前OCT表现,如导管接触角> 92°和导丝与正常冠状动脉接触,与oa后冠状动脉损伤相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictors of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy as assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Predictors of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy as assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Predictors of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy as assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Predictors of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy as assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Purpose: The association between the extent of the wire and device bias as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the healthy portion of the vessel and the risk of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy (OA) has not been fully elucidated. Thus, purpose of this study is to investigate the association between pre-OA OCT findings and post-OA coronary artery injury by OCT.

Methods: We enrolled 148 de novo lesions having calcified lesion required OA (max Ca angle > 90°) in 135 patients who underwent both pre- and post-OA OCT. In pre-OA OCT, OCT catheter contact angle and the presence or absences of guide-wire (GW) contact with the normal vessel intima were assessed. Also, in post-OA OCT, we assessed there was post-OA coronary artery injury (OA injury), defined as disappearance of both of intima and medial wall of normal vessel, or not.

Results: OA injury was found in 19 lesions (13%). Pre-PCI OCT catheter contact angle with the normal coronary artery was significantly larger (median 137°; inter quartile range [IQR] 113-169 vs. median 0°; IQR 0-0, P < 0.001) and more GW contact with the normal vessel was found (63% vs. 8%, P < 0.001). Pre-PCI OCT catheter contact angle > 92° and GW contact with the normal vessel intima were associated with post-OA vascular injury (Both: 92% (11/12), Either: 32% (8/25), Neither: 0% (0/111), P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Pre-PCI OCT findings, such as catheter contact angle > 92° and guide-wire contact to the normal coronary artery, were associated with post-OA coronary artery injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
77
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging publishes technical and clinical communications (original articles, review articles and editorial comments) associated with cardiovascular diseases. The technical communications include the research, development and evaluation of novel imaging methods in the various imaging domains. These domains include magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, X-ray imaging, intravascular imaging, and applications in nuclear cardiology and echocardiography, and any combination of these techniques. Of particular interest are topics in medical image processing and image-guided interventions. Clinical applications of such imaging techniques include improved diagnostic approaches, treatment , prognosis and follow-up of cardiovascular patients. Topics include: multi-center or larger individual studies dealing with risk stratification and imaging utilization, applications for better characterization of cardiovascular diseases, and assessment of the efficacy of new drugs and interventional devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信