在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用远程医疗进行围手术期疼痛管理。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231162399
Anping Xie, Yea-Jen Hsu, Traci J Speed, Jamia Saunders, Jaclyn Nguyen, Amro Khasawneh, Samuel Kim, Jill A Marsteller, Eileen M McDonald, Ronen Shechter, Marie N Hanna
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用远程医疗进行围手术期疼痛管理。","authors":"Anping Xie, Yea-Jen Hsu, Traci J Speed, Jamia Saunders, Jaclyn Nguyen, Amro Khasawneh, Samuel Kim, Jill A Marsteller, Eileen M McDonald, Ronen Shechter, Marie N Hanna","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231162399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Using a human factors engineering approach, the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program adopted telemedicine for perioperative pain management in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines the impact of telemedicine adoption on the quality and outcomes of perioperative pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study with a convergent parallel design was conducted. From June 2017 to December 2021, 902 patients participated in the Personalized Pain Program. Quantitative data on daily opioid consumption, pain severity and interference, physical and mental health status, and patient satisfaction and engagement were continuously collected with all patients using chart review and patient surveys. Beginning 23 March 2020, the Personalized Pain Program transitioned to telemedicine. A pre-post quasi-experimental design was used to examine the impact of telemedicine. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted with 3 clinicians and 17 patients to explore their experience with telemedicine visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monthly number of new patients seen in the Personalized Pain Program did not significantly change before and after telemedicine adoption. Compared to patients having in-person visits before the pandemic, patients having telemedicine visits during the pandemic achieved comparable improvements in daily opioid consumption, pain severity and interference, and physical health status. While telemedicine helped overcome many challenges faced by the patients, the limitations of telemedicine were also discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic stimulated the use of telemedicine. To facilitate telemedicine adoption beyond the pandemic, future research is needed to examine best practices for telemedicine adoption and provide additional evidence on the effectiveness of telemedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051007/pdf/10.1177_1357633X231162399.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of telemedicine for perioperative pain management during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Anping Xie, Yea-Jen Hsu, Traci J Speed, Jamia Saunders, Jaclyn Nguyen, Amro Khasawneh, Samuel Kim, Jill A Marsteller, Eileen M McDonald, Ronen Shechter, Marie N Hanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X231162399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Using a human factors engineering approach, the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program adopted telemedicine for perioperative pain management in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines the impact of telemedicine adoption on the quality and outcomes of perioperative pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study with a convergent parallel design was conducted. From June 2017 to December 2021, 902 patients participated in the Personalized Pain Program. Quantitative data on daily opioid consumption, pain severity and interference, physical and mental health status, and patient satisfaction and engagement were continuously collected with all patients using chart review and patient surveys. Beginning 23 March 2020, the Personalized Pain Program transitioned to telemedicine. A pre-post quasi-experimental design was used to examine the impact of telemedicine. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted with 3 clinicians and 17 patients to explore their experience with telemedicine visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monthly number of new patients seen in the Personalized Pain Program did not significantly change before and after telemedicine adoption. Compared to patients having in-person visits before the pandemic, patients having telemedicine visits during the pandemic achieved comparable improvements in daily opioid consumption, pain severity and interference, and physical health status. While telemedicine helped overcome many challenges faced by the patients, the limitations of telemedicine were also discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic stimulated the use of telemedicine. To facilitate telemedicine adoption beyond the pandemic, future research is needed to examine best practices for telemedicine adoption and provide additional evidence on the effectiveness of telemedicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051007/pdf/10.1177_1357633X231162399.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231162399\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231162399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:约翰霍普金斯大学个性化疼痛项目采用人因工程学方法,将远程医疗用于围手术期疼痛管理,以应对 COVID-19 大流行。本研究探讨了采用远程医疗对围术期疼痛管理的质量和效果的影响:方法:采用收敛平行设计的混合方法进行研究。从 2017 年 6 月到 2021 年 12 月,902 名患者参加了个性化疼痛项目。通过病历审查和患者调查,持续收集所有患者的每日阿片类药物用量、疼痛严重程度和干扰、身心健康状态、患者满意度和参与度等定量数据。自 2020 年 3 月 23 日起,个性化疼痛项目过渡到远程医疗。我们采用了前-后准实验设计来考察远程医疗的影响。此外,还对 3 名临床医生和 17 名患者进行了定性访谈,以了解他们对远程医疗就诊的体验:结果:在采用远程医疗前后,个性化疼痛项目的每月新就诊患者人数没有明显变化。与大流行前接受现场就诊的患者相比,大流行期间接受远程医疗就诊的患者在每日阿片类药物用量、疼痛严重程度和干扰程度以及身体健康状况方面的改善程度相当。虽然远程医疗有助于克服患者面临的许多挑战,但也讨论了远程医疗的局限性:结论:COVID-19 大流行促进了远程医疗的使用。为了在大流行之后促进远程医疗的应用,未来的研究需要考察远程医疗应用的最佳实践,并为远程医疗的有效性提供更多证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of telemedicine for perioperative pain management during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Using a human factors engineering approach, the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program adopted telemedicine for perioperative pain management in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines the impact of telemedicine adoption on the quality and outcomes of perioperative pain management.

Methods: A mixed-methods study with a convergent parallel design was conducted. From June 2017 to December 2021, 902 patients participated in the Personalized Pain Program. Quantitative data on daily opioid consumption, pain severity and interference, physical and mental health status, and patient satisfaction and engagement were continuously collected with all patients using chart review and patient surveys. Beginning 23 March 2020, the Personalized Pain Program transitioned to telemedicine. A pre-post quasi-experimental design was used to examine the impact of telemedicine. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted with 3 clinicians and 17 patients to explore their experience with telemedicine visits.

Results: The monthly number of new patients seen in the Personalized Pain Program did not significantly change before and after telemedicine adoption. Compared to patients having in-person visits before the pandemic, patients having telemedicine visits during the pandemic achieved comparable improvements in daily opioid consumption, pain severity and interference, and physical health status. While telemedicine helped overcome many challenges faced by the patients, the limitations of telemedicine were also discussed.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic stimulated the use of telemedicine. To facilitate telemedicine adoption beyond the pandemic, future research is needed to examine best practices for telemedicine adoption and provide additional evidence on the effectiveness of telemedicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信