加拿大囊性纤维化专业中心物理治疗师进行运动测试和培训的当前做法、障碍和促进因素。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Canada Pub Date : 2023-02-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3138/ptc-2021-0051
Sarib Malik, Bella Levi, Alan Chan, Hilary Cotnam, Luc Martineau, Eldon Thieu, Karl Zabjek, Poonam Sisodia, Kenneth Wu
{"title":"加拿大囊性纤维化专业中心物理治疗师进行运动测试和培训的当前做法、障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Sarib Malik, Bella Levi, Alan Chan, Hilary Cotnam, Luc Martineau, Eldon Thieu, Karl Zabjek, Poonam Sisodia, Kenneth Wu","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study surveyed physiotherapists working at Canadian cystic fibrosis (CF) specialized centres to investigate the current practice, barriers to, and facilitators of exercise testing and training. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Physiotherapists were recruited from 42 Canadian CF centres. They responded to an e-questionnaire regarding their practice. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eighteen physiotherapists responded (estimated response rate of 23%); median years of clinical experience was 15 (range, min-max, 3-30) years. Aerobic testing was administered by 44% of respondents, strength testing by 39%, aerobic training by 78%, and strength training by 67%. The most frequently reported barriers across all four types of exercise testing and training were insufficient funding (reported by 56%-67% of respondents), time (50%-61%) and staff availability (56%). More late career than early career physiotherapists reported utilizing aerobic testing (50% vs. 33% of respondents), strength testing (75% vs. 33%), aerobic training (100% vs. 67%), and strength training (100% vs. 33%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Exercise testing and training is underutilized in Canadian CF centres. Experienced physiotherapists reported utilizing exercise testing and training more than less-experienced physiotherapists. Post-graduate education and mentorship, especially for less-experienced clinicians, are recommended to emphasize the importance of exercise testing and training. Barriers of funding, time, and staff availability should be addressed to further improve quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10211377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Practice, Barriers to, and Facilitators of Exercise Testing and Training by Physiotherapists in Cystic Fibrosis Specialized Centres in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Sarib Malik, Bella Levi, Alan Chan, Hilary Cotnam, Luc Martineau, Eldon Thieu, Karl Zabjek, Poonam Sisodia, Kenneth Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ptc-2021-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study surveyed physiotherapists working at Canadian cystic fibrosis (CF) specialized centres to investigate the current practice, barriers to, and facilitators of exercise testing and training. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Physiotherapists were recruited from 42 Canadian CF centres. They responded to an e-questionnaire regarding their practice. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eighteen physiotherapists responded (estimated response rate of 23%); median years of clinical experience was 15 (range, min-max, 3-30) years. Aerobic testing was administered by 44% of respondents, strength testing by 39%, aerobic training by 78%, and strength training by 67%. The most frequently reported barriers across all four types of exercise testing and training were insufficient funding (reported by 56%-67% of respondents), time (50%-61%) and staff availability (56%). More late career than early career physiotherapists reported utilizing aerobic testing (50% vs. 33% of respondents), strength testing (75% vs. 33%), aerobic training (100% vs. 67%), and strength training (100% vs. 33%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Exercise testing and training is underutilized in Canadian CF centres. Experienced physiotherapists reported utilizing exercise testing and training more than less-experienced physiotherapists. Post-graduate education and mentorship, especially for less-experienced clinicians, are recommended to emphasize the importance of exercise testing and training. Barriers of funding, time, and staff availability should be addressed to further improve quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Canada\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10211377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2021-0051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Canada","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2021-0051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究调查了在加拿大囊性纤维化(CF)专科中心工作的物理治疗师,以了解运动测试和训练的现行做法、障碍和促进因素。调查方法:从 42 个加拿大 CF 中心招募物理治疗师。他们回答了有关其实践的电子问卷。数据采用描述性统计进行分析。结果:18 名物理治疗师做出了回复:18名物理治疗师做出了回复(估计回复率为23%);临床经验的中位数为15年(最小-最大值范围为3-30年)。44%的受访者进行了有氧测试,39%的受访者进行了力量测试,78%的受访者进行了有氧训练,67%的受访者进行了力量训练。在所有四种类型的运动测试和训练中,最常报告的障碍是资金不足(56%-67% 的受访者报告)、时间(50%-61%)和人员可用性(56%)。报告使用有氧测试(50% 的受访者对 33%的受访者)、力量测试(75% 的受访者对 33%的受访者)、有氧训练(100% 的受访者对 67%的受访者)和力量训练(100% 的受访者对 33%的受访者)的晚期职业物理治疗师多于早期职业物理治疗师。结论:加拿大 CF 中心对运动测试和训练的利用率较低。经验丰富的物理治疗师比经验不足的物理治疗师更多利用运动测试和训练。建议开展研究生教育和导师制,尤其是针对经验不足的临床医生,以强调运动测试和训练的重要性。应解决资金、时间和人员可用性方面的障碍,以进一步提高护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current Practice, Barriers to, and Facilitators of Exercise Testing and Training by Physiotherapists in Cystic Fibrosis Specialized Centres in Canada.

Purpose: This study surveyed physiotherapists working at Canadian cystic fibrosis (CF) specialized centres to investigate the current practice, barriers to, and facilitators of exercise testing and training. Method: Physiotherapists were recruited from 42 Canadian CF centres. They responded to an e-questionnaire regarding their practice. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Eighteen physiotherapists responded (estimated response rate of 23%); median years of clinical experience was 15 (range, min-max, 3-30) years. Aerobic testing was administered by 44% of respondents, strength testing by 39%, aerobic training by 78%, and strength training by 67%. The most frequently reported barriers across all four types of exercise testing and training were insufficient funding (reported by 56%-67% of respondents), time (50%-61%) and staff availability (56%). More late career than early career physiotherapists reported utilizing aerobic testing (50% vs. 33% of respondents), strength testing (75% vs. 33%), aerobic training (100% vs. 67%), and strength training (100% vs. 33%). Conclusions: Exercise testing and training is underutilized in Canadian CF centres. Experienced physiotherapists reported utilizing exercise testing and training more than less-experienced physiotherapists. Post-graduate education and mentorship, especially for less-experienced clinicians, are recommended to emphasize the importance of exercise testing and training. Barriers of funding, time, and staff availability should be addressed to further improve quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Canada
Physiotherapy Canada REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Canada is the official, scholarly, refereed journal of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA), giving direction to excellence in clinical science and reasoning, knowledge translation, therapeutic skills and patient-centred care. Founded in 1923, Physiotherapy Canada meets the diverse needs of national and international readers and serves as a key repository of inquiries, evidence and advances in the practice of physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Canada publishes the results of qualitative and quantitative research including systematic reviews, meta analyses, meta syntheses, public/health policy research, clinical practice guidelines, and case reports. Key messages, clinical commentaries, brief reports and book reviews support knowledge translation to clinical practice. In addition to delivering authoritative, original scientific articles and reports of significant clinical studies, Physiotherapy Canada’s editorials and abstracts are presented in both English and French, expanding the journal’s reach nationally and internationally. Key messages form an integral part of each research article, providing a succinct summary for readers of all levels. This approach also allows readers to quickly get a feel for ‘what is already known’ and ‘what this study adds to’ the subject. Clinician’s commentaries for key articles assist in bridging research and practice by discussing the article’s impact at the clinical level. The journal also features special themed series which bring readers up to date research supporting evidence-informed practice. The Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA) is the national professional association representing almost 15,000 members distributed throughout all provinces and territories. CPA’s mission is to provide leadership and direction to the physiotherapy profession, foster excellence in practice, education and research, and promote high standards of health in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信