多重装载FIT样本采集装置对粪便血红蛋白浓度的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1177/00045632231183850
Cerin John, Carolyn Piggott, Sally C Benton
{"title":"多重装载FIT样本采集装置对粪便血红蛋白浓度的影响。","authors":"Cerin John, Carolyn Piggott, Sally C Benton","doi":"10.1177/00045632231183850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are routinely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes around the world. More recently, quantitative FIT has been recommended to help triage patients presenting to primary care with symptoms suggestive of CRC. Participants collect faecal samples using sampling probes which are inserted into sample collection devices (SCDs) containing preservative buffer. The SCDs have an internal collar designed to remove excess sample. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of multiple loading on faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) using SCDs of four FIT systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pools of f-Hb negative samples were spiked with blood, homogenised and loaded into SCDs 1, 3 and 5 times, with insertion of the sampling probes into the SCDs with and without mixing between loads. The f-Hb was measured using the relevant FIT system. The percentage change in f-Hb for multiple loads was compared with a single load for each system for the mixed and unmixed groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The <i>p</i> values show a significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the mass and f-Hb for the mixed and unmixed group, for 1-3 and 1-5 loads for all systems. The median percentage change in f-Hb for the mixed is higher than the unmixed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that multiple loading does significantly increase the f-Hb in the SCDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"70-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of multiple loading FIT sample collection devices on faecal haemoglobin concentration.\",\"authors\":\"Cerin John, Carolyn Piggott, Sally C Benton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632231183850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are routinely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes around the world. More recently, quantitative FIT has been recommended to help triage patients presenting to primary care with symptoms suggestive of CRC. Participants collect faecal samples using sampling probes which are inserted into sample collection devices (SCDs) containing preservative buffer. The SCDs have an internal collar designed to remove excess sample. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of multiple loading on faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) using SCDs of four FIT systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pools of f-Hb negative samples were spiked with blood, homogenised and loaded into SCDs 1, 3 and 5 times, with insertion of the sampling probes into the SCDs with and without mixing between loads. The f-Hb was measured using the relevant FIT system. The percentage change in f-Hb for multiple loads was compared with a single load for each system for the mixed and unmixed groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The <i>p</i> values show a significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the mass and f-Hb for the mixed and unmixed group, for 1-3 and 1-5 loads for all systems. The median percentage change in f-Hb for the mixed is higher than the unmixed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that multiple loading does significantly increase the f-Hb in the SCDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"70-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231183850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231183850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Faecal免疫化学测试(FIT)在世界各地的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查计划中被常规使用。最近,定量FIT被建议帮助对出现CRC症状的初级保健患者进行分类。参与者使用插入含有防腐剂缓冲液的样本采集装置(SCD)的采样探针采集粪便样本。SCD有一个内部轴环,用于去除多余的样本。本研究的目的是使用四种FIT系统的SCD来研究多重负荷对粪便血红蛋白浓度(f-Hb)的影响。方法:将f-Hb阴性样本池掺入血液,匀浆并装载到SCD中1、3和5次,将采样探针插入SCD中,负载之间混合或不混合。使用相关的FIT系统测量f-Hb。将混合组和未混合组的多个负荷的f-Hb的百分比变化与每个系统的单个负荷进行比较。结果:对于所有系统的1-3和1-5负荷,混合组和未混合组的p值显示出质量和f-Hb的显著差异(p<0.05)。混合组f-Hb的中位百分比变化高于未混合组。结论:本研究表明,多次负荷确实显著增加SCDs中的f-Hb。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of multiple loading FIT sample collection devices on faecal haemoglobin concentration.

Background: Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are routinely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes around the world. More recently, quantitative FIT has been recommended to help triage patients presenting to primary care with symptoms suggestive of CRC. Participants collect faecal samples using sampling probes which are inserted into sample collection devices (SCDs) containing preservative buffer. The SCDs have an internal collar designed to remove excess sample. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of multiple loading on faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) using SCDs of four FIT systems.

Methods: Pools of f-Hb negative samples were spiked with blood, homogenised and loaded into SCDs 1, 3 and 5 times, with insertion of the sampling probes into the SCDs with and without mixing between loads. The f-Hb was measured using the relevant FIT system. The percentage change in f-Hb for multiple loads was compared with a single load for each system for the mixed and unmixed groups.

Results: The p values show a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the mass and f-Hb for the mixed and unmixed group, for 1-3 and 1-5 loads for all systems. The median percentage change in f-Hb for the mixed is higher than the unmixed group.

Conclusion: This study showed that multiple loading does significantly increase the f-Hb in the SCDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信