Zian Tong, Jue Shi, Fuming He, Lijie Fan, Yu Wang, Misi Si
{"title":"未经结构化培训的牙医提供的与牙医相关的危险因素对种植体存活的影响:一项回顾性横断面研究结果","authors":"Zian Tong, Jue Shi, Fuming He, Lijie Fan, Yu Wang, Misi Si","doi":"10.11607/jomi.9969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the cumulative survival rate (CSR) of implants placed by Chinese dentists who lacked structured training and to identify the dentist-related risk factors associated with implant failure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from 2,036 patients who underwent implant-supported restoration at a university-affiliated stomatology hospital were collected. CSR was regarded as the dependent variable. Patient-related characteristics (age, sex, insertion site, and surgical complexity) and dentist-related factors (experience, number of implant brands used, education level, sex, and specialty) were collected as independent variables. The chi-square test was used to identify dentist-related factors for implant failure after addressing patient-related potential confounders using propensity score matching (PSM). Dentist- and patient-related risk factors were further analyzed using multivariable logistic regression within the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CSRs were 98.48% for patients (with single or multiple implants) and 98.86% for implants after 48 to 60 months of observation. Dentists with < 5 years of experience and specialists in implant dentistry were significantly associated with implant failure after addressing potential patient-related confounders. Within the group of dentists with < 5 years of experience, complicated cases were the major risk factor. For the group of specialists in implant dentistry, < 5 years of experience and male patient were the major risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New dentists (< 5 years of experience) and specialists in implant dentistry are considered to be dentist-related risk factors for implant failure. This confirms that a learning curve exists for new specialists to reach the level of proficiency and expertise. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:553-561. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9969.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":"38 3","pages":"553-561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Dentist-Related Risk Factors on Implant Survival Provided by Dentists Without Structured Training: Results of a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zian Tong, Jue Shi, Fuming He, Lijie Fan, Yu Wang, Misi Si\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.9969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the cumulative survival rate (CSR) of implants placed by Chinese dentists who lacked structured training and to identify the dentist-related risk factors associated with implant failure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from 2,036 patients who underwent implant-supported restoration at a university-affiliated stomatology hospital were collected. CSR was regarded as the dependent variable. Patient-related characteristics (age, sex, insertion site, and surgical complexity) and dentist-related factors (experience, number of implant brands used, education level, sex, and specialty) were collected as independent variables. The chi-square test was used to identify dentist-related factors for implant failure after addressing patient-related potential confounders using propensity score matching (PSM). Dentist- and patient-related risk factors were further analyzed using multivariable logistic regression within the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CSRs were 98.48% for patients (with single or multiple implants) and 98.86% for implants after 48 to 60 months of observation. Dentists with < 5 years of experience and specialists in implant dentistry were significantly associated with implant failure after addressing potential patient-related confounders. Within the group of dentists with < 5 years of experience, complicated cases were the major risk factor. For the group of specialists in implant dentistry, < 5 years of experience and male patient were the major risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New dentists (< 5 years of experience) and specialists in implant dentistry are considered to be dentist-related risk factors for implant failure. This confirms that a learning curve exists for new specialists to reach the level of proficiency and expertise. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:553-561. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9969.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"553-561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9969\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of Dentist-Related Risk Factors on Implant Survival Provided by Dentists Without Structured Training: Results of a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Purpose: To evaluate the cumulative survival rate (CSR) of implants placed by Chinese dentists who lacked structured training and to identify the dentist-related risk factors associated with implant failure.
Materials and methods: Data from 2,036 patients who underwent implant-supported restoration at a university-affiliated stomatology hospital were collected. CSR was regarded as the dependent variable. Patient-related characteristics (age, sex, insertion site, and surgical complexity) and dentist-related factors (experience, number of implant brands used, education level, sex, and specialty) were collected as independent variables. The chi-square test was used to identify dentist-related factors for implant failure after addressing patient-related potential confounders using propensity score matching (PSM). Dentist- and patient-related risk factors were further analyzed using multivariable logistic regression within the subgroups.
Results: The CSRs were 98.48% for patients (with single or multiple implants) and 98.86% for implants after 48 to 60 months of observation. Dentists with < 5 years of experience and specialists in implant dentistry were significantly associated with implant failure after addressing potential patient-related confounders. Within the group of dentists with < 5 years of experience, complicated cases were the major risk factor. For the group of specialists in implant dentistry, < 5 years of experience and male patient were the major risk factors.
Conclusion: New dentists (< 5 years of experience) and specialists in implant dentistry are considered to be dentist-related risk factors for implant failure. This confirms that a learning curve exists for new specialists to reach the level of proficiency and expertise. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:553-561. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9969.
期刊介绍:
Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786
ISSN (Online): 1942-4434
This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.