客户对虚拟治疗法庭的态度

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Bradley Ray , Tara Kunkel , Kristina Bryant , Bethany Hedden , Barbara Andraka-Christou , Meghan O'Neil , Philip Huynh
{"title":"客户对虚拟治疗法庭的态度","authors":"Bradley Ray ,&nbsp;Tara Kunkel ,&nbsp;Kristina Bryant ,&nbsp;Bethany Hedden ,&nbsp;Barbara Andraka-Christou ,&nbsp;Meghan O'Neil ,&nbsp;Philip Huynh","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many treatment courts shifted to offering teleservices. We sought to examine the barriers that clients faced when transitioning to virtual court and treatment, and how this transition impacted their perceptions of the treatment court experience.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Center for State Courts administered an online survey between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021, deployed to state and local court administrators, which resulted in 1356 unique client responses from 121 courts. The survey measured attitudes about the treatment court process, including interactions with the judge, the behavioral health treatment staff, and treatment groups, as well as barriers to virtual and in-person court. We hypothesized that clients with fewer technological barriers to virtual service, who shifted to virtual court or treatment, would report more positive attitudes to this service delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clients felt more comfortable participating in virtual court sessions than in-person sessions but were less likely to feel like the judge was familiar with their case during virtual court sessions. From the treatment perspective, clients felt more connected with other group members and reported greater benefit from treatment staff when treatment services were delivered in-person, but clients felt less anxious when treatment groups were virtual.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Even though virtual experiences were more comfortable than in-person experiences for clients, the results are nuanced and show preference for some in-person connections as they transitioned to virtual connections. Future research should examine how to improve client connections with staff/group members during virtual court or treatment sessions, particularly as courts and treatment providers are likely to continue some services virtually into the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 108833"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9236911/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court\",\"authors\":\"Bradley Ray ,&nbsp;Tara Kunkel ,&nbsp;Kristina Bryant ,&nbsp;Bethany Hedden ,&nbsp;Barbara Andraka-Christou ,&nbsp;Meghan O'Neil ,&nbsp;Philip Huynh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many treatment courts shifted to offering teleservices. We sought to examine the barriers that clients faced when transitioning to virtual court and treatment, and how this transition impacted their perceptions of the treatment court experience.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Center for State Courts administered an online survey between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021, deployed to state and local court administrators, which resulted in 1356 unique client responses from 121 courts. The survey measured attitudes about the treatment court process, including interactions with the judge, the behavioral health treatment staff, and treatment groups, as well as barriers to virtual and in-person court. We hypothesized that clients with fewer technological barriers to virtual service, who shifted to virtual court or treatment, would report more positive attitudes to this service delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clients felt more comfortable participating in virtual court sessions than in-person sessions but were less likely to feel like the judge was familiar with their case during virtual court sessions. From the treatment perspective, clients felt more connected with other group members and reported greater benefit from treatment staff when treatment services were delivered in-person, but clients felt less anxious when treatment groups were virtual.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Even though virtual experiences were more comfortable than in-person experiences for clients, the results are nuanced and show preference for some in-person connections as they transitioned to virtual connections. Future research should examine how to improve client connections with staff/group members during virtual court or treatment sessions, particularly as courts and treatment providers are likely to continue some services virtually into the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9236911/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222001155\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222001155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为应对COVID-19大流行,许多治疗法院转向提供远程服务。我们试图研究客户在过渡到虚拟法庭和治疗时面临的障碍,以及这种过渡如何影响他们对治疗法庭经验的看法。方法国家州法院中心在2021年1月1日至2021年7月31日期间进行了一项在线调查,部署到州和地方法院管理人员中,从121家法院获得了1356份独特的客户回复。调查测量了人们对治疗法庭程序的态度,包括与法官、行为健康治疗人员和治疗小组的互动,以及虚拟和面对面法庭的障碍。我们假设,对虚拟服务的技术障碍较少的客户,转向虚拟法庭或虚拟治疗,会报告对这种服务提供的更积极的态度。结果客户在虚拟庭审中比面对面庭审时感觉更舒服,但在虚拟庭审中不太可能觉得法官熟悉他们的案件。从治疗的角度来看,当治疗人员亲自提供治疗服务时,客户感到与其他小组成员的联系更紧密,并报告从治疗人员那里获得了更大的好处,但当治疗小组是虚拟的时,客户感到的焦虑程度降低了。虽然虚拟体验对客户来说比面对面体验更舒适,但结果是微妙的,并且在他们过渡到虚拟连接时显示出对某些面对面连接的偏好。未来的研究应审查如何在虚拟法庭或治疗期间改善客户与工作人员/小组成员的联系,特别是因为法院和治疗提供者可能在未来继续提供虚拟服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court

Introduction

As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many treatment courts shifted to offering teleservices. We sought to examine the barriers that clients faced when transitioning to virtual court and treatment, and how this transition impacted their perceptions of the treatment court experience.

Methods

The National Center for State Courts administered an online survey between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021, deployed to state and local court administrators, which resulted in 1356 unique client responses from 121 courts. The survey measured attitudes about the treatment court process, including interactions with the judge, the behavioral health treatment staff, and treatment groups, as well as barriers to virtual and in-person court. We hypothesized that clients with fewer technological barriers to virtual service, who shifted to virtual court or treatment, would report more positive attitudes to this service delivery.

Results

Clients felt more comfortable participating in virtual court sessions than in-person sessions but were less likely to feel like the judge was familiar with their case during virtual court sessions. From the treatment perspective, clients felt more connected with other group members and reported greater benefit from treatment staff when treatment services were delivered in-person, but clients felt less anxious when treatment groups were virtual.

Conclusions

Even though virtual experiences were more comfortable than in-person experiences for clients, the results are nuanced and show preference for some in-person connections as they transitioned to virtual connections. Future research should examine how to improve client connections with staff/group members during virtual court or treatment sessions, particularly as courts and treatment providers are likely to continue some services virtually into the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信