使用硅胶咬合定位材料和口内扫描仪进行咬合定位对咬合强度的影响比较

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

International Journal of Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.11607/ijp.8445

Masumi Nishine, Hiro Kobayashi, Kosei Ito, Juro Wadachi, Akinori Tasaka, Shuichiro Yamashita

{"title":"使用硅胶咬合定位材料和口内扫描仪进行咬合定位对咬合强度的影响比较","authors":"Masumi Nishine, Hiro Kobayashi, Kosei Ito, Juro Wadachi, Akinori Tasaka, Shuichiro Yamashita","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To clarify the influence of clenching strength on interocclusal registration using an intraoral scanner (IOS).Materials and methods: The study includes eight volunteers as subjects, and the two experimental conditions were light clenching (LC) and 40% maximum voluntary clenching (MVC). Conventional silicone bite registration and an IOS were used for comparison. Occlusal contact areas (OCAs) for different clenching strengths were compared, along with variation of measured values (VMVs) between recording methods.Results: Significant differences were observed between conditions on OCA and between methods on VMV.Conclusions: Clenching strength influenced interocclusal registration using IOS.","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"457-459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Interocclusal Registration Using Silicone Bite Registration Material and Intraoral Scanner on Clenching Strength.\",\"authors\":\"Masumi Nishine, Hiro Kobayashi, Kosei Ito, Juro Wadachi, Akinori Tasaka, Shuichiro Yamashita\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To clarify the influence of clenching strength on interocclusal registration using an intraoral scanner (IOS).Materials and methods: The study includes eight volunteers as subjects, and the two experimental conditions were light clenching (LC) and 40% maximum voluntary clenching (MVC). Conventional silicone bite registration and an IOS were used for comparison. Occlusal contact areas (OCAs) for different clenching strengths were compared, along with variation of measured values (VMVs) between recording methods.Results: Significant differences were observed between conditions on OCA and between methods on VMV.Conclusions: Clenching strength influenced interocclusal registration using IOS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"457-459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8445\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：使用口内扫描仪（IOS）明确咬合强度对咬合间登记的影响：研究对象包括八名志愿者，两种实验条件分别为轻度咬合（LC）和 40% 的最大自主咬合（MVC）。使用传统的硅胶咬合登记器和 IOS 进行比较。比较了不同咬合强度下的咬合接触面积（OCA），以及记录方法之间的测量值差异（VMV）：结果：不同条件下的咬合接触面积（OCA）和不同方法下的测量值（VMV）存在显著差异：结论：咬合强度会影响使用 IOS 进行的咬合间配准。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison Between Interocclusal Registration Using Silicone Bite Registration Material and Intraoral Scanner on Clenching Strength.

Purpose: To clarify the influence of clenching strength on interocclusal registration using an intraoral scanner (IOS).

Materials and methods: The study includes eight volunteers as subjects, and the two experimental conditions were light clenching (LC) and 40% maximum voluntary clenching (MVC). Conventional silicone bite registration and an IOS were used for comparison. Occlusal contact areas (OCAs) for different clenching strengths were compared, along with variation of measured values (VMVs) between recording methods.

Results: Significant differences were observed between conditions on OCA and between methods on VMV.

Conclusions: Clenching strength influenced interocclusal registration using IOS.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Prosthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

4.30%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP) Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.