食管癌经颈椎管下淋巴结清扫术难度的预测因素。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Esophagus Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s10388-022-00983-w
Hirotaka Furuke, Hirotaka Konishi, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Atsushi Shiozaki, Takuma Ohashi, Hiroki Shimizu, Tomohiro Arita, Yusuke Yamamoto, Ryo Morimura, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Hisashi Ikoma, Takeshi Kubota, Kazuma Okamoto, Eigo Otsuji
{"title":"食管癌经颈椎管下淋巴结清扫术难度的预测因素。","authors":"Hirotaka Furuke, Hirotaka Konishi, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Atsushi Shiozaki, Takuma Ohashi, Hiroki Shimizu, Tomohiro Arita, Yusuke Yamamoto, Ryo Morimura, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Hisashi Ikoma, Takeshi Kubota, Kazuma Okamoto, Eigo Otsuji","doi":"10.1007/s10388-022-00983-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transmediastinal radical esophagectomy (TME) is a new minimally invasive approach without thoracotomy. However, the transcervical dissection of subcarinal lymph nodes (SCLN) is challenging. The shape or narrowness of the mediastinal space, particularly around the aortic arch to the tracheal bifurcation, may increase the difficulty of this procedure. The present study aimed to clarify predictors of the difficulty of transcervical SCLN dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent TME between 2016 and 2019 were included (n = 126). Four indicators, the cervical angle, carina distance, aorta distance, and sternum distance, were defined as indicators of mediastinal narrowness by 3D-CT. The relationships between the difficulty of transcervical SCLN dissection and clinicopathological features, including the above indicators, were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a univariate analysis, the cervical angle (p = 0.023), aorta distance (p = 0.002), and middle thoracic tumor (p = 0.040) correlated with difficulty. The median cervical angle and aorta distance were 15° and 33 mm in difficult cases and 19° and 43 mm in easy cases, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the short aorta distance (odds ratio: 7.96, p = 0.002) and middle thoracic tumor (odds ratio: 3.35, p = 0.042) were independent predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cervical angle, aorta distance, and middle thoracic tumor may predict the difficulty of transcervical SCLN dissection. In difficult cases, a transhiatal approach should be combined for complete SCLN dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of the difficulty of transcervical subcarinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Hirotaka Furuke, Hirotaka Konishi, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Atsushi Shiozaki, Takuma Ohashi, Hiroki Shimizu, Tomohiro Arita, Yusuke Yamamoto, Ryo Morimura, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Hisashi Ikoma, Takeshi Kubota, Kazuma Okamoto, Eigo Otsuji\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10388-022-00983-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transmediastinal radical esophagectomy (TME) is a new minimally invasive approach without thoracotomy. However, the transcervical dissection of subcarinal lymph nodes (SCLN) is challenging. The shape or narrowness of the mediastinal space, particularly around the aortic arch to the tracheal bifurcation, may increase the difficulty of this procedure. The present study aimed to clarify predictors of the difficulty of transcervical SCLN dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent TME between 2016 and 2019 were included (n = 126). Four indicators, the cervical angle, carina distance, aorta distance, and sternum distance, were defined as indicators of mediastinal narrowness by 3D-CT. The relationships between the difficulty of transcervical SCLN dissection and clinicopathological features, including the above indicators, were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a univariate analysis, the cervical angle (p = 0.023), aorta distance (p = 0.002), and middle thoracic tumor (p = 0.040) correlated with difficulty. The median cervical angle and aorta distance were 15° and 33 mm in difficult cases and 19° and 43 mm in easy cases, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the short aorta distance (odds ratio: 7.96, p = 0.002) and middle thoracic tumor (odds ratio: 3.35, p = 0.042) were independent predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cervical angle, aorta distance, and middle thoracic tumor may predict the difficulty of transcervical SCLN dissection. In difficult cases, a transhiatal approach should be combined for complete SCLN dissection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esophagus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234892/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-022-00983-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-022-00983-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经纵隔根治性食管切除术(TME)是一种无需开胸的新型微创方法。然而,经颈部清扫纵隔下淋巴结(SCLN)具有挑战性。纵隔空间的形状或狭窄程度,尤其是主动脉弓至气管分叉周围的纵隔空间,可能会增加该手术的难度。本研究旨在明确经颈部 SCLN 夹层手术难度的预测因素:纳入2016年至2019年期间接受TME的患者(n = 126)。通过3D-CT将颈椎角、心窝距离、主动脉距离和胸骨距离四项指标定义为纵隔狭窄的指标。研究了经颈椎SCLN解剖难度与临床病理特征(包括上述指标)之间的关系:在单变量分析中,颈椎角度(p = 0.023)、主动脉距离(p = 0.002)和中胸肿瘤(p = 0.040)与难度相关。困难病例的中位颈椎角度和主动脉距离分别为 15°和 33 毫米,容易病例的中位颈椎角度和主动脉距离分别为 19°和 43 毫米。在多变量分析中,主动脉距离短(几率比:7.96,P = 0.002)和中胸肿瘤(几率比:3.35,P = 0.042)是独立的预测因素:结论:颈椎角度、主动脉距离和中胸肿瘤可预测经颈椎SCLN剥离的难度。结论:颈椎角度、主动脉距离和中胸肿瘤可预测经颈椎 SCLN 剥离的难度,在困难病例中,应结合经食管方法进行完整的 SCLN 剥离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictors of the difficulty of transcervical subcarinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.

Predictors of the difficulty of transcervical subcarinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.

Predictors of the difficulty of transcervical subcarinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.

Predictors of the difficulty of transcervical subcarinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.

Background: Transmediastinal radical esophagectomy (TME) is a new minimally invasive approach without thoracotomy. However, the transcervical dissection of subcarinal lymph nodes (SCLN) is challenging. The shape or narrowness of the mediastinal space, particularly around the aortic arch to the tracheal bifurcation, may increase the difficulty of this procedure. The present study aimed to clarify predictors of the difficulty of transcervical SCLN dissection.

Methods: Patients who underwent TME between 2016 and 2019 were included (n = 126). Four indicators, the cervical angle, carina distance, aorta distance, and sternum distance, were defined as indicators of mediastinal narrowness by 3D-CT. The relationships between the difficulty of transcervical SCLN dissection and clinicopathological features, including the above indicators, were investigated.

Results: In a univariate analysis, the cervical angle (p = 0.023), aorta distance (p = 0.002), and middle thoracic tumor (p = 0.040) correlated with difficulty. The median cervical angle and aorta distance were 15° and 33 mm in difficult cases and 19° and 43 mm in easy cases, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the short aorta distance (odds ratio: 7.96, p = 0.002) and middle thoracic tumor (odds ratio: 3.35, p = 0.042) were independent predictive factors.

Conclusions: The cervical angle, aorta distance, and middle thoracic tumor may predict the difficulty of transcervical SCLN dissection. In difficult cases, a transhiatal approach should be combined for complete SCLN dissection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信