确定优化联合医疗专业人员电子病历的机会:一项概念图研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maria Schwarz, Elizabeth C Ward, Anne Coccetti, Joshua Simmons, Sara Burrett, Philip Juffs, Kristy Perkins, Jasmine Foley
{"title":"确定优化联合医疗专业人员电子病历的机会:一项概念图研究。","authors":"Maria Schwarz,&nbsp;Elizabeth C Ward,&nbsp;Anne Coccetti,&nbsp;Joshua Simmons,&nbsp;Sara Burrett,&nbsp;Philip Juffs,&nbsp;Kristy Perkins,&nbsp;Jasmine Foley","doi":"10.1071/AH22288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To utilise a concept mapping process to identify key opportunities for electronic medical record (EMR) optimisation for allied health professionals (AHPs). Methods A total of 26 participants (allied health managers, clinicians and healthcare consumers) completed the concept mapping process, which included generating statements, and then subsequently sorting all statements into groups, and also ranking each statement for importance and changeability (0 = not important/changeable, 4 extremely important/changeable). Multivariate analysis and multidimensional scaling were then used to identify core priorities for digital optimisation. Results Participants generated 98 discrete statements that were grouped into 13 conceptual clusters. Of these, 36 statements were subsequently determined to fall within the 'green zone' on the Go-Zone plot of importance and changeability (changeability ≥2.44, importance ≥2.79), and formed the set of key optimisation priorities. Clusters with the most items in the Go-Zone plot were 'training and business rules ' and 'service statistics .' Conclusion Concept mapping facilitated identification of 36 key optimisation priorities considered both changeable and important to assist EMR optimisation for AHPs. Addressing these priorities requires action related to end-user skills and training, EMR system capacity, and streamlining of governance and collaboration for the optimisation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":"47 3","pages":"369-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying opportunities to optimise the electronic medical record for allied health professionals: a concept mapping study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Schwarz,&nbsp;Elizabeth C Ward,&nbsp;Anne Coccetti,&nbsp;Joshua Simmons,&nbsp;Sara Burrett,&nbsp;Philip Juffs,&nbsp;Kristy Perkins,&nbsp;Jasmine Foley\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH22288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective To utilise a concept mapping process to identify key opportunities for electronic medical record (EMR) optimisation for allied health professionals (AHPs). Methods A total of 26 participants (allied health managers, clinicians and healthcare consumers) completed the concept mapping process, which included generating statements, and then subsequently sorting all statements into groups, and also ranking each statement for importance and changeability (0 = not important/changeable, 4 extremely important/changeable). Multivariate analysis and multidimensional scaling were then used to identify core priorities for digital optimisation. Results Participants generated 98 discrete statements that were grouped into 13 conceptual clusters. Of these, 36 statements were subsequently determined to fall within the 'green zone' on the Go-Zone plot of importance and changeability (changeability ≥2.44, importance ≥2.79), and formed the set of key optimisation priorities. Clusters with the most items in the Go-Zone plot were 'training and business rules ' and 'service statistics .' Conclusion Concept mapping facilitated identification of 36 key optimisation priorities considered both changeable and important to assist EMR optimisation for AHPs. Addressing these priorities requires action related to end-user skills and training, EMR system capacity, and streamlining of governance and collaboration for the optimisation process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"369-378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22288\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的利用概念映射过程来确定联合卫生专业人员(ahp)优化电子病历(EMR)的关键机会。方法共26名参与者(专职健康管理人员、临床医生和医疗保健消费者)完成概念映射过程,包括生成陈述,然后对所有陈述进行分组,并对每个陈述的重要性和可变性进行排名(0 =不重要/可变,4 =极其重要/可变)。然后使用多变量分析和多维尺度来确定数字优化的核心优先级。结果参与者产生了98个离散的陈述,这些陈述被分为13个概念类。其中,36个语句随后被确定在Go-Zone图的重要性和可变性(可变性≥2.44,重要性≥2.79)上属于“绿色区域”,并形成了关键优化优先级集。在Go-Zone图中项目最多的集群是“培训和业务规则”和“服务统计”。结论概念映射有助于识别36个关键优化优先级,这些优先级被认为是可变的,对ahp的EMR优化很重要。解决这些优先事项需要采取与最终用户技能和培训、电子病历系统能力以及为优化过程而简化治理和协作相关的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying opportunities to optimise the electronic medical record for allied health professionals: a concept mapping study.

Objective To utilise a concept mapping process to identify key opportunities for electronic medical record (EMR) optimisation for allied health professionals (AHPs). Methods A total of 26 participants (allied health managers, clinicians and healthcare consumers) completed the concept mapping process, which included generating statements, and then subsequently sorting all statements into groups, and also ranking each statement for importance and changeability (0 = not important/changeable, 4 extremely important/changeable). Multivariate analysis and multidimensional scaling were then used to identify core priorities for digital optimisation. Results Participants generated 98 discrete statements that were grouped into 13 conceptual clusters. Of these, 36 statements were subsequently determined to fall within the 'green zone' on the Go-Zone plot of importance and changeability (changeability ≥2.44, importance ≥2.79), and formed the set of key optimisation priorities. Clusters with the most items in the Go-Zone plot were 'training and business rules ' and 'service statistics .' Conclusion Concept mapping facilitated identification of 36 key optimisation priorities considered both changeable and important to assist EMR optimisation for AHPs. Addressing these priorities requires action related to end-user skills and training, EMR system capacity, and streamlining of governance and collaboration for the optimisation process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信