了解疫苗接种前东亚地区特殊的COVID-19结果

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Jay Bhattacharya , Phillip Magness , Martin Kulldorff
{"title":"了解疫苗接种前东亚地区特殊的COVID-19结果","authors":"Jay Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Phillip Magness ,&nbsp;Martin Kulldorff","doi":"10.1016/j.jbior.2022.100916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During the first year of the pandemic, East Asian countries have reported fewer infections, hospitalizations, and deaths from COVID-19 disease than most countries in Europe and the Americas. Our goal in this paper is to generate and evaluate hypothesis that may explain this striking fact. We consider five possible explanations: (1) population age structure (younger people tend to have less severe COVID-19 disease upon infection than older people); (2) the early adoption of lockdown strategies to control disease spread; (3) genetic differences between East Asian population and European and American populations that confer protection against COVID-19 disease; (4) seasonal and climactic contributors to COVID-19 spread; and (5) immunological differences between East Asian countries and the rest of the world. The evidence suggests that the first four hypotheses are unlikely to be important in explaining East Asian COVID-19 exceptionalism. Lockdowns, in particular, fail as an explanation because East Asian countries experienced similarly good infection outcomes despite vast differences in lockdown policies adopted by different countries to control the COVID-19 epidemic. The evidence to date is consistent with our fifth hypothesis – pre-existing immunity unique to East Asia – but there are still essential parts of this story left for scientists to check.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7214,"journal":{"name":"Advances in biological regulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575551/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the exceptional pre-vaccination Era East Asian COVID-19 outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Jay Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Phillip Magness ,&nbsp;Martin Kulldorff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbior.2022.100916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>During the first year of the pandemic, East Asian countries have reported fewer infections, hospitalizations, and deaths from COVID-19 disease than most countries in Europe and the Americas. Our goal in this paper is to generate and evaluate hypothesis that may explain this striking fact. We consider five possible explanations: (1) population age structure (younger people tend to have less severe COVID-19 disease upon infection than older people); (2) the early adoption of lockdown strategies to control disease spread; (3) genetic differences between East Asian population and European and American populations that confer protection against COVID-19 disease; (4) seasonal and climactic contributors to COVID-19 spread; and (5) immunological differences between East Asian countries and the rest of the world. The evidence suggests that the first four hypotheses are unlikely to be important in explaining East Asian COVID-19 exceptionalism. Lockdowns, in particular, fail as an explanation because East Asian countries experienced similarly good infection outcomes despite vast differences in lockdown policies adopted by different countries to control the COVID-19 epidemic. The evidence to date is consistent with our fifth hypothesis – pre-existing immunity unique to East Asia – but there are still essential parts of this story left for scientists to check.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in biological regulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575551/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in biological regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212492622000562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in biological regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212492622000562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在大流行的第一年,东亚国家报告的COVID-19感染、住院和死亡人数低于大多数欧洲和美洲国家。我们在本文中的目标是产生和评估可能解释这一惊人事实的假设。我们考虑了五种可能的解释:(1)人口年龄结构(年轻人感染COVID-19后的严重程度往往低于老年人);(2)及早采取封锁策略控制疾病传播;(3)东亚人群与欧美人群对COVID-19疾病具有保护作用的遗传差异;(4)造成COVID-19传播的季节性和气候因素;(5)东亚国家与世界其他地区之间的免疫学差异。证据表明,前四种假设不太可能对解释东亚新冠肺炎例外论起到重要作用。封锁尤其不能解释这一现象,因为尽管不同国家为控制COVID-19疫情采取的封锁政策存在巨大差异,但东亚国家的感染结果同样良好。迄今为止的证据与我们的第五个假设——东亚特有的预先存在的免疫力——是一致的,但这个故事的关键部分仍有待科学家去验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding the exceptional pre-vaccination Era East Asian COVID-19 outcomes

Understanding the exceptional pre-vaccination Era East Asian COVID-19 outcomes

Understanding the exceptional pre-vaccination Era East Asian COVID-19 outcomes

Understanding the exceptional pre-vaccination Era East Asian COVID-19 outcomes

During the first year of the pandemic, East Asian countries have reported fewer infections, hospitalizations, and deaths from COVID-19 disease than most countries in Europe and the Americas. Our goal in this paper is to generate and evaluate hypothesis that may explain this striking fact. We consider five possible explanations: (1) population age structure (younger people tend to have less severe COVID-19 disease upon infection than older people); (2) the early adoption of lockdown strategies to control disease spread; (3) genetic differences between East Asian population and European and American populations that confer protection against COVID-19 disease; (4) seasonal and climactic contributors to COVID-19 spread; and (5) immunological differences between East Asian countries and the rest of the world. The evidence suggests that the first four hypotheses are unlikely to be important in explaining East Asian COVID-19 exceptionalism. Lockdowns, in particular, fail as an explanation because East Asian countries experienced similarly good infection outcomes despite vast differences in lockdown policies adopted by different countries to control the COVID-19 epidemic. The evidence to date is consistent with our fifth hypothesis – pre-existing immunity unique to East Asia – but there are still essential parts of this story left for scientists to check.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in biological regulation
Advances in biological regulation Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
17 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信