我们对手术安全清单感到安全吗?两个时期之间的横断面研究。

Danah Alsadun, Hassan Arishi, Abdullah Alhaqbani, Reema Alzighaibi, Emad Masuadi, Yazeed Aldakhil, Zeyad Yousef, Sami Almalki, Mohammed Alnaser, Sami Boghdadly
{"title":"我们对手术安全清单感到安全吗?两个时期之间的横断面研究。","authors":"Danah Alsadun,&nbsp;Hassan Arishi,&nbsp;Abdullah Alhaqbani,&nbsp;Reema Alzighaibi,&nbsp;Emad Masuadi,&nbsp;Yazeed Aldakhil,&nbsp;Zeyad Yousef,&nbsp;Sami Almalki,&nbsp;Mohammed Alnaser,&nbsp;Sami Boghdadly","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-20-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in the healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) and patient safety in the operating room (OR) at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City. Data were collected from two years (2011 and 2019) for comparison. The co-investigators distributed a self-administered Likert scale questionnaire in the various operating areas (35 ORs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample was 461. Number of participants enrolled from both years was 235 (51%) and 226 (49%), respectively. The results indicated a statistically significant difference in the attitude of the participants regarding all aspects of patient safety in the OR when the two periods were compared (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the importance of the WHO SSC increased from 50% (2011) excellent to 68% excellent (2019) (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, more healthcare providers recognize the importance of the WHO SSC, and more have a positive attitude toward teamwork, communication, and feeling free to speak out when surgical safety is compromised. All of these cultural changes have positive impact on the overall safety of the OR; however, there are still aspects requiring improvement to provide a safer OR and surgery. Educational interventions regarding the importance of communication and teamwork would improve the safety of surgical care in the OR.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"4 4","pages":"135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/36/i2589-9449-4-4-135.PMC10229031.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do We Feel Safe About the Surgical Safety Checklist? A Cross-Sectional Study Between Two Periods.\",\"authors\":\"Danah Alsadun,&nbsp;Hassan Arishi,&nbsp;Abdullah Alhaqbani,&nbsp;Reema Alzighaibi,&nbsp;Emad Masuadi,&nbsp;Yazeed Aldakhil,&nbsp;Zeyad Yousef,&nbsp;Sami Almalki,&nbsp;Mohammed Alnaser,&nbsp;Sami Boghdadly\",\"doi\":\"10.36401/JQSH-20-46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in the healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) and patient safety in the operating room (OR) at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City. Data were collected from two years (2011 and 2019) for comparison. The co-investigators distributed a self-administered Likert scale questionnaire in the various operating areas (35 ORs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample was 461. Number of participants enrolled from both years was 235 (51%) and 226 (49%), respectively. The results indicated a statistically significant difference in the attitude of the participants regarding all aspects of patient safety in the OR when the two periods were compared (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the importance of the WHO SSC increased from 50% (2011) excellent to 68% excellent (2019) (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, more healthcare providers recognize the importance of the WHO SSC, and more have a positive attitude toward teamwork, communication, and feeling free to speak out when surgical safety is compromised. All of these cultural changes have positive impact on the overall safety of the OR; however, there are still aspects requiring improvement to provide a safer OR and surgery. Educational interventions regarding the importance of communication and teamwork would improve the safety of surgical care in the OR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"135-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/36/i2589-9449-4-4-135.PMC10229031.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-20-46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-20-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究的目的是评估医疗保健提供者对世界卫生组织手术安全清单(WHO SSC)和沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级医院手术室(OR)患者安全的看法的变化。方法:本横断面研究在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城进行。收集了两年(2011年和2019年)的数据进行比较。共同调查人员在各个手术区域(35个手术室)分发了一份自我管理的李克特量表问卷。结果:总样本461份。这两年的受试者人数分别为235人(51%)和226人(49%)。结果表明,当两个时间段比较时,参与者对手术室中患者安全的所有方面的态度有统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.001)。同样,医疗保健提供者对世卫组织SSC重要性的看法从50%(2011年)优秀增加到68%(2019年)优秀(p < 0.001)。结论:目前,越来越多的卫生保健提供者认识到WHO SSC的重要性,越来越多的人对团队合作、沟通持积极态度,并且在手术安全受到损害时可以自由地发表意见。所有这些文化变化对手术室的整体安全都有积极的影响;然而,仍有一些方面需要改进,以提供更安全的手术室和手术。关于沟通和团队合作重要性的教育干预将提高手术室手术护理的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Do We Feel Safe About the Surgical Safety Checklist? A Cross-Sectional Study Between Two Periods.

Do We Feel Safe About the Surgical Safety Checklist? A Cross-Sectional Study Between Two Periods.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in the healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) and patient safety in the operating room (OR) at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City. Data were collected from two years (2011 and 2019) for comparison. The co-investigators distributed a self-administered Likert scale questionnaire in the various operating areas (35 ORs).

Results: The total sample was 461. Number of participants enrolled from both years was 235 (51%) and 226 (49%), respectively. The results indicated a statistically significant difference in the attitude of the participants regarding all aspects of patient safety in the OR when the two periods were compared (p < 0.001). Similarly, healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the importance of the WHO SSC increased from 50% (2011) excellent to 68% excellent (2019) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Currently, more healthcare providers recognize the importance of the WHO SSC, and more have a positive attitude toward teamwork, communication, and feeling free to speak out when surgical safety is compromised. All of these cultural changes have positive impact on the overall safety of the OR; however, there are still aspects requiring improvement to provide a safer OR and surgery. Educational interventions regarding the importance of communication and teamwork would improve the safety of surgical care in the OR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信