加拿大罕见病昂贵药物的价值和成本?

Q3 Medicine
Sandra Sirrs, Helen Anderson, Bashir Jiwani, Larry D Lynd, Eric Lun, Bob Nakagawa, Dean Regier, Shirin Rizzardo, Anne McFarlane
{"title":"加拿大罕见病昂贵药物的价值和成本?","authors":"Sandra Sirrs,&nbsp;Helen Anderson,&nbsp;Bashir Jiwani,&nbsp;Larry D Lynd,&nbsp;Eric Lun,&nbsp;Bob Nakagawa,&nbsp;Dean Regier,&nbsp;Shirin Rizzardo,&nbsp;Anne McFarlane","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2023.27000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been explosive growth in the market for expensive drugs for rare diseases (EDRDs). Traditional standards of evidence are not achievable for rare diseases, so lower standards are applied. The price of these drugs is extremely high. This combination of lower standards and higher prices make EDRDs attractive to manufacturers. Legislation designed to incentivize drug development for rare diseases contains loopholes that drive prices up worldwide. Canada compounds those problems with a complex network of agencies that impede communication between those providing market authorization and those purchasing drugs. Drug pricing is not related to metrics like investment or value, but rather willingness to pay. Without high-quality evidence to assess value, we inadvertently prioritize patients with rare diseases over those with common diseases, creating conflict among ethical principles such as social utility, justice and the rule of rescue. Lack of transparency over what is being funded and for whom makes it hard to mitigate challenges through effective policy development. We review the evidentiary, economic and ethical issues around EDRDs and ways to move forward, including enhanced transparency and the development of high-quality evidence to ensure that we do not pay for drugs that do not work.</p>","PeriodicalId":35522,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Papers","volume":"21 1","pages":"10-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expensive Drugs for Rare Diseases in Canada: What Value and at What Cost?\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Sirrs,&nbsp;Helen Anderson,&nbsp;Bashir Jiwani,&nbsp;Larry D Lynd,&nbsp;Eric Lun,&nbsp;Bob Nakagawa,&nbsp;Dean Regier,&nbsp;Shirin Rizzardo,&nbsp;Anne McFarlane\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpap.2023.27000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There has been explosive growth in the market for expensive drugs for rare diseases (EDRDs). Traditional standards of evidence are not achievable for rare diseases, so lower standards are applied. The price of these drugs is extremely high. This combination of lower standards and higher prices make EDRDs attractive to manufacturers. Legislation designed to incentivize drug development for rare diseases contains loopholes that drive prices up worldwide. Canada compounds those problems with a complex network of agencies that impede communication between those providing market authorization and those purchasing drugs. Drug pricing is not related to metrics like investment or value, but rather willingness to pay. Without high-quality evidence to assess value, we inadvertently prioritize patients with rare diseases over those with common diseases, creating conflict among ethical principles such as social utility, justice and the rule of rescue. Lack of transparency over what is being funded and for whom makes it hard to mitigate challenges through effective policy development. We review the evidentiary, economic and ethical issues around EDRDs and ways to move forward, including enhanced transparency and the development of high-quality evidence to ensure that we do not pay for drugs that do not work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Papers\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"10-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2023.27000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2023.27000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

罕见病(EDRDs)昂贵药物市场出现爆炸性增长。对于罕见病,传统的证据标准无法实现,因此采用了较低的标准。这些药的价格非常高。较低的标准和较高的价格使edrd对制造商具有吸引力。旨在激励罕见疾病药物开发的立法存在漏洞,导致全球价格上涨。加拿大复杂的机构网络阻碍了提供市场授权者和药品购买者之间的沟通,这使这些问题更加复杂。药品定价与投资或价值等指标无关,而与支付意愿有关。在没有高质量证据来评估价值的情况下,我们不经意地将罕见病患者置于常见病患者之上,从而在社会效用、正义和救助规则等伦理原则之间产生冲突。由于在资助对象和资助对象方面缺乏透明度,很难通过有效的政策制定来缓解挑战。我们审查了与EDRDs相关的证据、经济和伦理问题以及前进的途径,包括提高透明度和开发高质量证据,以确保我们不会为无效的药物买单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expensive Drugs for Rare Diseases in Canada: What Value and at What Cost?

There has been explosive growth in the market for expensive drugs for rare diseases (EDRDs). Traditional standards of evidence are not achievable for rare diseases, so lower standards are applied. The price of these drugs is extremely high. This combination of lower standards and higher prices make EDRDs attractive to manufacturers. Legislation designed to incentivize drug development for rare diseases contains loopholes that drive prices up worldwide. Canada compounds those problems with a complex network of agencies that impede communication between those providing market authorization and those purchasing drugs. Drug pricing is not related to metrics like investment or value, but rather willingness to pay. Without high-quality evidence to assess value, we inadvertently prioritize patients with rare diseases over those with common diseases, creating conflict among ethical principles such as social utility, justice and the rule of rescue. Lack of transparency over what is being funded and for whom makes it hard to mitigate challenges through effective policy development. We review the evidentiary, economic and ethical issues around EDRDs and ways to move forward, including enhanced transparency and the development of high-quality evidence to ensure that we do not pay for drugs that do not work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Papers
Healthcare Papers Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Integrating community-based health and social care has grabbed international attention as a way of addressing the needs of aging populations while contributing to health systems" sustainability. However, integrating initiatives in different jurisdictions work (or do not work) within very various.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信