慈善基金会的话语与护理的未来:第二部分:RWJF护理倡议未来的批判性话语分析。

IF 1.6 4区医学 Q2 NURSING

Advances in Nursing Science Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000451

Shawn M Kneipp, Mary K Canales, Denise J Drevdahl

{"title":"慈善基金会的话语与护理的未来:第二部分:RWJF护理倡议未来的批判性话语分析。","authors":"Shawn M Kneipp, Mary K Canales, Denise J Drevdahl","doi":"10.1097/ANS.0000000000000451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical social scholarship highlights the power philanthropic foundations wield on the collective agency of groups, yet analyses specific to nursing are absent in the literature. In this second of a 2-part series, we employed critical discourse analysis to examine how control of enunciative privilege in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) 2010 and 2020-2030 Future of Nursing (FON) initiatives challenge nursing's ability to enact its collective agency, particularly through professional nursing organizations. Findings are discussed within the context of nursing's self-regulatory privileges, history, and agentic obligations that are bestowed on the discipline by the greater public for the public good.","PeriodicalId":50857,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nursing Science","volume":"46 2","pages":"169-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Philanthropic Foundations' Discourse and Nursing's Future: Part II: A Critical Discourse Analysis of RWJF Future of Nursing Initiatives.\",\"authors\":\"Shawn M Kneipp, Mary K Canales, Denise J Drevdahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANS.0000000000000451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical social scholarship highlights the power philanthropic foundations wield on the collective agency of groups, yet analyses specific to nursing are absent in the literature. In this second of a 2-part series, we employed critical discourse analysis to examine how control of enunciative privilege in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) 2010 and 2020-2030 Future of Nursing (FON) initiatives challenge nursing's ability to enact its collective agency, particularly through professional nursing organizations. Findings are discussed within the context of nursing's self-regulatory privileges, history, and agentic obligations that are bestowed on the discipline by the greater public for the public good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Nursing Science\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"169-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Nursing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000451\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

批判性的社会学术强调了慈善基金会对群体集体代理的影响力，但文献中没有具体的护理分析。在2部分系列的第2部分中，我们采用批判性话语分析来研究罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会(RWJF) 2010年和2020-2030年护理未来(FON)倡议中对发声特权的控制如何挑战护理制定其集体代理的能力，特别是通过专业护理组织。研究结果在护理的自我调节特权、历史和代理义务的背景下进行了讨论，这些义务是由更大的公众为了公共利益而赋予这一学科的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Philanthropic Foundations' Discourse and Nursing's Future: Part II: A Critical Discourse Analysis of RWJF Future of Nursing Initiatives.

Critical social scholarship highlights the power philanthropic foundations wield on the collective agency of groups, yet analyses specific to nursing are absent in the literature. In this second of a 2-part series, we employed critical discourse analysis to examine how control of enunciative privilege in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) 2010 and 2020-2030 Future of Nursing (FON) initiatives challenge nursing's ability to enact its collective agency, particularly through professional nursing organizations. Findings are discussed within the context of nursing's self-regulatory privileges, history, and agentic obligations that are bestowed on the discipline by the greater public for the public good.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Advances in Nursing Science 医学-护理

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

6.20%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Consistently ranked as one of the most-read and most assigned journals by faculties of graduate programs in nursing, Advances in Nursing Science (ANS) is intellectually challenging, innovative and progressive, and features articles from a wide range of scholarly traditions. The journal particularly encourages works that speak to the need for global sustainability and that take an intersectional approach, recognizing class, color, sexual and gender identity, and other dimensions of human experience related to health. Articles in ANS are peer-reviewed and chosen for their pioneering perspectives and for their significance in contributing the evolution of the discipline of nursing.