Vincent Towell , Kirsten Van Gysen , Shamira Cross , Gary KK Low
{"title":"志愿者预充氧对延长呼气末屏气时间应用于腹部放疗的效果","authors":"Vincent Towell , Kirsten Van Gysen , Shamira Cross , Gary KK Low","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>End expiration breath hold (EEBH) is the preferred motion management method for abdominal Stereotactic Ablative Body<!--> <!-->Radiotherapy (SABR) treatments. However, multiple short EEBHs are required to complete a single treatment session. The study aimed to determine the efficacy of preoxygenation with hyperventilation in extending an EEBH duration.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We randomised 10 healthy participants into two arms, each included breathing room air and oxygen at a rate of 10 L per minute (l/min) without hyperventilation for four minutes, and normally for four minutes and with hyperventilation for one minute at a rate of 20 breaths/minute for hyperventilation. The type of gas was blinded from the participants for each test. EEBH durations were then recorded, as well as systolic blood pressure, SpO<sub>2</sub> and heart rate. A discomfort rating was also recorded after each breath hold.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A significant increase in duration of almost 50% was observed between normal breathing of room air and breathing oxygen normally followed by hyperventilation. Vital signs remained consistent between the 4 tests. The tests were well tolerated with 75% of participants recording none or minimal discomfort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoxygenation with hyperventilation could be used to increase the EEBH duration for abdominal SABR patients which would assist in the accuracy of these treatments and possibly resulting in a reduction of overall treatment times.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/0e/main.PMC10189463.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of preoxygenation administration in volunteers, in extending the end-expiration breath-hold duration for application to abdominal radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Towell , Kirsten Van Gysen , Shamira Cross , Gary KK Low\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>End expiration breath hold (EEBH) is the preferred motion management method for abdominal Stereotactic Ablative Body<!--> <!-->Radiotherapy (SABR) treatments. However, multiple short EEBHs are required to complete a single treatment session. The study aimed to determine the efficacy of preoxygenation with hyperventilation in extending an EEBH duration.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We randomised 10 healthy participants into two arms, each included breathing room air and oxygen at a rate of 10 L per minute (l/min) without hyperventilation for four minutes, and normally for four minutes and with hyperventilation for one minute at a rate of 20 breaths/minute for hyperventilation. The type of gas was blinded from the participants for each test. EEBH durations were then recorded, as well as systolic blood pressure, SpO<sub>2</sub> and heart rate. A discomfort rating was also recorded after each breath hold.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A significant increase in duration of almost 50% was observed between normal breathing of room air and breathing oxygen normally followed by hyperventilation. Vital signs remained consistent between the 4 tests. The tests were well tolerated with 75% of participants recording none or minimal discomfort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoxygenation with hyperventilation could be used to increase the EEBH duration for abdominal SABR patients which would assist in the accuracy of these treatments and possibly resulting in a reduction of overall treatment times.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/0e/main.PMC10189463.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of preoxygenation administration in volunteers, in extending the end-expiration breath-hold duration for application to abdominal radiotherapy
Background and purpose
End expiration breath hold (EEBH) is the preferred motion management method for abdominal Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) treatments. However, multiple short EEBHs are required to complete a single treatment session. The study aimed to determine the efficacy of preoxygenation with hyperventilation in extending an EEBH duration.
Materials and methods
We randomised 10 healthy participants into two arms, each included breathing room air and oxygen at a rate of 10 L per minute (l/min) without hyperventilation for four minutes, and normally for four minutes and with hyperventilation for one minute at a rate of 20 breaths/minute for hyperventilation. The type of gas was blinded from the participants for each test. EEBH durations were then recorded, as well as systolic blood pressure, SpO2 and heart rate. A discomfort rating was also recorded after each breath hold.
Results
A significant increase in duration of almost 50% was observed between normal breathing of room air and breathing oxygen normally followed by hyperventilation. Vital signs remained consistent between the 4 tests. The tests were well tolerated with 75% of participants recording none or minimal discomfort.
Conclusion
Preoxygenation with hyperventilation could be used to increase the EEBH duration for abdominal SABR patients which would assist in the accuracy of these treatments and possibly resulting in a reduction of overall treatment times.