具体、公平和透明:加拿大为罕见疾病药物提供资金的程序。

Q3 Medicine
Helen Stevenson
{"title":"具体、公平和透明:加拿大为罕见疾病药物提供资金的程序。","authors":"Helen Stevenson","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2023.26999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Canada, the focus on value for money and evaluating efficacy according to traditional ways has presented challenges to the funding of drugs for rare diseases (DRDs). This commentary validates and extends two worthy recommendations from the lead paper in this issue of <i>Healthcare Papers</i> (Sirrs et al. 2023). The paper's first recommendation, for a pan-Canadian approach for collecting evidentiary data, is critical. In the commentary, I add to this finding by suggesting that we enable patients to track and measure their response to treatment through data capture. The second recommendation is a pan-Canadian framework for funding DRDs. I extend the recommendation with an argument for public and private payer guidance as well as a fair and transparent funding framework solely for DRDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":35522,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Papers","volume":"21 1","pages":"28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specific, Fair and Transparent: A Canadian Process for Funding Drugs for Rare Diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Helen Stevenson\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpap.2023.26999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Canada, the focus on value for money and evaluating efficacy according to traditional ways has presented challenges to the funding of drugs for rare diseases (DRDs). This commentary validates and extends two worthy recommendations from the lead paper in this issue of <i>Healthcare Papers</i> (Sirrs et al. 2023). The paper's first recommendation, for a pan-Canadian approach for collecting evidentiary data, is critical. In the commentary, I add to this finding by suggesting that we enable patients to track and measure their response to treatment through data capture. The second recommendation is a pan-Canadian framework for funding DRDs. I extend the recommendation with an argument for public and private payer guidance as well as a fair and transparent funding framework solely for DRDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Papers\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"28-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2023.26999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2023.26999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在加拿大,注重物有所值并根据传统方法评估疗效,这对罕见病药物的筹资构成了挑战。这篇评论验证并扩展了本期《医疗保健论文》(Sirrs et al. 2023)的主要论文中的两个有价值的建议。这篇论文的第一个建议是采用一种泛加拿大的方法来收集证据数据,这是至关重要的。在评论中,我补充了这一发现,建议我们通过数据捕获使患者能够跟踪和测量他们对治疗的反应。第二项建议是建立一个泛加拿大的防治疾病筹资框架。我扩展了这一建议,提出了对公共和私人付款人的指导,以及一个公平和透明的筹资框架,仅用于预防和预防疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Specific, Fair and Transparent: A Canadian Process for Funding Drugs for Rare Diseases.

In Canada, the focus on value for money and evaluating efficacy according to traditional ways has presented challenges to the funding of drugs for rare diseases (DRDs). This commentary validates and extends two worthy recommendations from the lead paper in this issue of Healthcare Papers (Sirrs et al. 2023). The paper's first recommendation, for a pan-Canadian approach for collecting evidentiary data, is critical. In the commentary, I add to this finding by suggesting that we enable patients to track and measure their response to treatment through data capture. The second recommendation is a pan-Canadian framework for funding DRDs. I extend the recommendation with an argument for public and private payer guidance as well as a fair and transparent funding framework solely for DRDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Papers
Healthcare Papers Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Integrating community-based health and social care has grabbed international attention as a way of addressing the needs of aging populations while contributing to health systems" sustainability. However, integrating initiatives in different jurisdictions work (or do not work) within very various.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信