{"title":"COVID-19对当代st段抬高型心肌梗死患者血栓分级的实际作用","authors":"Ata Firouzi, Zahra Hosseini, Zeinab Norouzi, Zohre Hosseini, Afshin Amirpour, Hamed Talakoob, Arash Amin, Abbas Soleimani, Nasrolah Moradifar, Shahrokh Karbalai, Mohammadhossein Mozafarybazargani, Hamidreza Hekmat, Majid Maleki, Parham Sadeghipour, Seyedeh Mahnaz Mirbod, Mina Ghorbanpoor Kohnaki, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Masoomeh Kalaei Nia, Fatemeh Sadate Habibizade, Sara Iraninejad, Mohammadreza Baay, Ehsan Khalilipur","doi":"10.18502/jthc.v17i3.10842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exist on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study, conducted in 6 centers in Iran, aimed to compare baseline clinical and procedural data between a case group, comprising STEMI patients with COVID-19, and a control group, comprising STEMI patients before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to determine in-hospital infarct-related artery thrombus grades and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of deaths from any cause (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular), nonfatal strokes, and stent thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding baseline characteristics. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was performed in 72.9% of the cases and 98.5% of the controls (P=0.043), and primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 6.2% of the cases and 1.4% of the controls (P=0.048). Successful PPCI procedures (final TIMI flow grade III) were significantly fewer in the case group (66.5% vs 93.5%; P=0.001). The baseline thrombus grade before wire crossing was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The summation of thrombus grades IV and V was 75% in the case group and 82% in the control group (P=0.432). The rate of MACCEs was 14.5% and 2.1% in the case and control groups, respectively (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, the thrombus grade had no significant differences between the case and control groups; however, the in-hospital rates of the no-reflow phenomenon, periprocedural MI, mechanical complications, and MACCEs were statistically significantly higher in the case group.</p>","PeriodicalId":39149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","volume":"17 3","pages":"103-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/e1/JTHC-17-103.PMC10222945.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pragmatic Role of COVID-19 on the Thrombus Grade of Patients with Contemporary ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Ata Firouzi, Zahra Hosseini, Zeinab Norouzi, Zohre Hosseini, Afshin Amirpour, Hamed Talakoob, Arash Amin, Abbas Soleimani, Nasrolah Moradifar, Shahrokh Karbalai, Mohammadhossein Mozafarybazargani, Hamidreza Hekmat, Majid Maleki, Parham Sadeghipour, Seyedeh Mahnaz Mirbod, Mina Ghorbanpoor Kohnaki, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Masoomeh Kalaei Nia, Fatemeh Sadate Habibizade, Sara Iraninejad, Mohammadreza Baay, Ehsan Khalilipur\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jthc.v17i3.10842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exist on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study, conducted in 6 centers in Iran, aimed to compare baseline clinical and procedural data between a case group, comprising STEMI patients with COVID-19, and a control group, comprising STEMI patients before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to determine in-hospital infarct-related artery thrombus grades and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of deaths from any cause (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular), nonfatal strokes, and stent thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding baseline characteristics. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was performed in 72.9% of the cases and 98.5% of the controls (P=0.043), and primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 6.2% of the cases and 1.4% of the controls (P=0.048). Successful PPCI procedures (final TIMI flow grade III) were significantly fewer in the case group (66.5% vs 93.5%; P=0.001). The baseline thrombus grade before wire crossing was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The summation of thrombus grades IV and V was 75% in the case group and 82% in the control group (P=0.432). The rate of MACCEs was 14.5% and 2.1% in the case and control groups, respectively (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, the thrombus grade had no significant differences between the case and control groups; however, the in-hospital rates of the no-reflow phenomenon, periprocedural MI, mechanical complications, and MACCEs were statistically significantly higher in the case group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"103-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/e1/JTHC-17-103.PMC10222945.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v17i3.10842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v17i3.10842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Pragmatic Role of COVID-19 on the Thrombus Grade of Patients with Contemporary ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Background: Limited data exist on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods: This multicenter study, conducted in 6 centers in Iran, aimed to compare baseline clinical and procedural data between a case group, comprising STEMI patients with COVID-19, and a control group, comprising STEMI patients before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to determine in-hospital infarct-related artery thrombus grades and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of deaths from any cause (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular), nonfatal strokes, and stent thrombosis.
Results: No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding baseline characteristics. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was performed in 72.9% of the cases and 98.5% of the controls (P=0.043), and primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 6.2% of the cases and 1.4% of the controls (P=0.048). Successful PPCI procedures (final TIMI flow grade III) were significantly fewer in the case group (66.5% vs 93.5%; P=0.001). The baseline thrombus grade before wire crossing was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The summation of thrombus grades IV and V was 75% in the case group and 82% in the control group (P=0.432). The rate of MACCEs was 14.5% and 2.1% in the case and control groups, respectively (P=0.002).
Conclusion: In our study, the thrombus grade had no significant differences between the case and control groups; however, the in-hospital rates of the no-reflow phenomenon, periprocedural MI, mechanical complications, and MACCEs were statistically significantly higher in the case group.