能力评估中的临床问题。

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-16 DOI:10.1176/appi.focus.23022006
Paul S Appelbaum, Loren H Roth
{"title":"能力评估中的临床问题。","authors":"Paul S Appelbaum, Loren H Roth","doi":"10.1176/appi.focus.23022006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evaluation of a patient's competency to consent to treatment, regardless of the test of competency used, can be substantially affected by a number of clinical factors. The authors point out that, in assessing competency, the clinician must consider 1) psychodynamic elements of the patient's personality, 2) the accuracy of the historical information conveyed by the patient, 3) the accuracy and completeness of the information disclosed to the patient, 4) the stability of the patient's mental status over time, and 5) the effect of the setting in which consent is obtained. Inattention to these factors can lead to errors in assessment of competency that can have important implications for patient care. Reprinted from <i>Am J Psychiatry 1981; 138:1462-1467</i>, with permission from American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Copyright © 1981.</p>","PeriodicalId":73036,"journal":{"name":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","volume":"21 1","pages":"106-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172542/pdf/","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Issues in the Assessment of Competency.\",\"authors\":\"Paul S Appelbaum, Loren H Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.focus.23022006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The evaluation of a patient's competency to consent to treatment, regardless of the test of competency used, can be substantially affected by a number of clinical factors. The authors point out that, in assessing competency, the clinician must consider 1) psychodynamic elements of the patient's personality, 2) the accuracy of the historical information conveyed by the patient, 3) the accuracy and completeness of the information disclosed to the patient, 4) the stability of the patient's mental status over time, and 5) the effect of the setting in which consent is obtained. Inattention to these factors can lead to errors in assessment of competency that can have important implications for patient care. Reprinted from <i>Am J Psychiatry 1981; 138:1462-1467</i>, with permission from American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Copyright © 1981.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"106-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.23022006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.23022006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

无论使用哪种能力测试,对患者同意治疗的能力进行评估都会受到许多临床因素的严重影响。作者指出,在评估能力时,临床医生必须考虑:1)患者人格中的心理动力学因素;2)患者提供的历史信息的准确性;3)向患者披露的信息的准确性和完整性;4)随着时间的推移患者精神状态的稳定性;5)获得同意的环境的影响。不注意这些因素会导致能力评估错误,从而对患者护理产生重要影响。转载自《美国精神病学杂志》(Am J Psychiatry 1981; 138:1462-1467),经美国精神病学协会出版社授权。版权 © 1981。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Issues in the Assessment of Competency.

The evaluation of a patient's competency to consent to treatment, regardless of the test of competency used, can be substantially affected by a number of clinical factors. The authors point out that, in assessing competency, the clinician must consider 1) psychodynamic elements of the patient's personality, 2) the accuracy of the historical information conveyed by the patient, 3) the accuracy and completeness of the information disclosed to the patient, 4) the stability of the patient's mental status over time, and 5) the effect of the setting in which consent is obtained. Inattention to these factors can lead to errors in assessment of competency that can have important implications for patient care. Reprinted from Am J Psychiatry 1981; 138:1462-1467, with permission from American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Copyright © 1981.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信