泵上心脏手术后 6 小时内在手术室拔管与在重症监护室拔管的对比:早期结果和医院成本。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Andrew D. Hawkins MD , Raymond J. Strobel MD, MSc , J. Hunter Mehaffey MD, MSc , Robert B. Hawkins MD, MSc , Evan P. Rotar MD, MS , Andrew M. Young MD , Leora T. Yarboro MD , Kenan Yount MD, MBA , Gorav Ailawadi MD, MBA , Mark Joseph MD , Mohammed Quader MD , Nicholas R. Teman MD
{"title":"泵上心脏手术后 6 小时内在手术室拔管与在重症监护室拔管的对比:早期结果和医院成本。","authors":"Andrew D. Hawkins MD ,&nbsp;Raymond J. Strobel MD, MSc ,&nbsp;J. Hunter Mehaffey MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Robert B. Hawkins MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Evan P. Rotar MD, MS ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Young MD ,&nbsp;Leora T. Yarboro MD ,&nbsp;Kenan Yount MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Gorav Ailawadi MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Mark Joseph MD ,&nbsp;Mohammed Quader MD ,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Teman MD","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Time-directed extubation<span> (fast-track) protocols may decrease length of stay and cost but data on operating room (OR) extubation is limited. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of extubation in the OR versus fast-track extubation within 6 hours of leaving the operating room. Patients undergoing nonemergent STS index cases (2011–2021) who were extubated within 6 hours were identified from a regional STS quality collaborative. Patients were stratified by extubation in the OR versus fast track. Propensity score matching (1:n) was performed to balance baseline differences. Of the 24,962 patients, 498 were extubated in the OR. After matching, 487 OR extubation cases and 899 fast track cases were well balanced. The rate of reintubation was higher for patients extubated in the OR [21/487 (4.3%) vs 16/899 (1.8%), </span></span><em>P</em><span> = 0.008] as was the incidence of reoperation for bleeding [12/487 (2.5%) vs 8/899 (0.9%), </span><em>P</em> = 0.03]. There was no significant difference in the rate of any reoperation [16/487 (3.3%) vs 15/899 (1.6%), <em>P</em><span> = 0.06] or operative mortality [4/487 (0.8%) vs 6/899 (0.6%), </span><em>P</em> = 0.7]. OR extubation was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (5.6 vs 6.2 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and lower total cost of admission ($29,602 vs $31,565 <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). OR extubation is associated with a higher postoperative risk of reintubation and reoperation due to bleeding, but lower resource utilization.Future research exploring predictors of extubation readiness may be required prior to widespread adoption of this practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operating Room Versus Intensive Care Unit Extubation Within 6 Hours After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: Early Results and Hospital Costs\",\"authors\":\"Andrew D. Hawkins MD ,&nbsp;Raymond J. Strobel MD, MSc ,&nbsp;J. Hunter Mehaffey MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Robert B. Hawkins MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Evan P. Rotar MD, MS ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Young MD ,&nbsp;Leora T. Yarboro MD ,&nbsp;Kenan Yount MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Gorav Ailawadi MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Mark Joseph MD ,&nbsp;Mohammed Quader MD ,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Teman MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.09.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Time-directed extubation<span> (fast-track) protocols may decrease length of stay and cost but data on operating room (OR) extubation is limited. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of extubation in the OR versus fast-track extubation within 6 hours of leaving the operating room. Patients undergoing nonemergent STS index cases (2011–2021) who were extubated within 6 hours were identified from a regional STS quality collaborative. Patients were stratified by extubation in the OR versus fast track. Propensity score matching (1:n) was performed to balance baseline differences. Of the 24,962 patients, 498 were extubated in the OR. After matching, 487 OR extubation cases and 899 fast track cases were well balanced. The rate of reintubation was higher for patients extubated in the OR [21/487 (4.3%) vs 16/899 (1.8%), </span></span><em>P</em><span> = 0.008] as was the incidence of reoperation for bleeding [12/487 (2.5%) vs 8/899 (0.9%), </span><em>P</em> = 0.03]. There was no significant difference in the rate of any reoperation [16/487 (3.3%) vs 15/899 (1.6%), <em>P</em><span> = 0.06] or operative mortality [4/487 (0.8%) vs 6/899 (0.6%), </span><em>P</em> = 0.7]. OR extubation was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (5.6 vs 6.2 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and lower total cost of admission ($29,602 vs $31,565 <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). OR extubation is associated with a higher postoperative risk of reintubation and reoperation due to bleeding, but lower resource utilization.Future research exploring predictors of extubation readiness may be required prior to widespread adoption of this practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043067922002726\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043067922002726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

时间定向拔管(快速通道)方案可缩短住院时间并降低费用,但有关手术室拔管的数据却很有限。本研究旨在比较手术室内拔管与离开手术室后 6 小时内快速拔管的结果。从地区 STS 质量合作组织中筛选出在 6 小时内拔管的非急诊 STS 指数病例(2011-2021 年)患者。患者按在手术室拔管与快速通道拔管进行分层。进行倾向评分匹配(1:n)以平衡基线差异。在 24962 名患者中,有 498 人在手术室拔管。经过匹配后,487 例手术室拔管病例和 899 例快速通道病例达到了很好的平衡。在手术室拔管的患者再次插管率更高[21/487 (4.3%) vs 16/899 (1.8%),P = 0.008],因出血再次手术的发生率也更高[12/487 (2.5%) vs 8/899 (0.9%),P = 0.03]。再次手术率[16/487(3.3%) vs 15/899(1.6%),P = 0.06]或手术死亡率[4/487(0.8%) vs 6/899(0.6%),P = 0.7]无明显差异。手术后拔管可缩短住院时间(5.6 天 vs 6.2 天,P < 0.001),降低住院总费用(29,602 美元 vs 31,565 美元,P < 0.001)。手术室拔管与较高的术后再次插管风险和因出血而再次手术相关,但资源利用率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Operating Room Versus Intensive Care Unit Extubation Within 6 Hours After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: Early Results and Hospital Costs

Operating Room Versus Intensive Care Unit Extubation Within 6 Hours After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: Early Results and Hospital Costs

Operating Room Versus Intensive Care Unit Extubation Within 6 Hours After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: Early Results and Hospital Costs

Time-directed extubation (fast-track) protocols may decrease length of stay and cost but data on operating room (OR) extubation is limited. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of extubation in the OR versus fast-track extubation within 6 hours of leaving the operating room. Patients undergoing nonemergent STS index cases (2011–2021) who were extubated within 6 hours were identified from a regional STS quality collaborative. Patients were stratified by extubation in the OR versus fast track. Propensity score matching (1:n) was performed to balance baseline differences. Of the 24,962 patients, 498 were extubated in the OR. After matching, 487 OR extubation cases and 899 fast track cases were well balanced. The rate of reintubation was higher for patients extubated in the OR [21/487 (4.3%) vs 16/899 (1.8%), P = 0.008] as was the incidence of reoperation for bleeding [12/487 (2.5%) vs 8/899 (0.9%), P = 0.03]. There was no significant difference in the rate of any reoperation [16/487 (3.3%) vs 15/899 (1.6%), P = 0.06] or operative mortality [4/487 (0.8%) vs 6/899 (0.6%), P = 0.7]. OR extubation was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (5.6 vs 6.2 days, P < 0.001) and lower total cost of admission ($29,602 vs $31,565 P < 0.001). OR extubation is associated with a higher postoperative risk of reintubation and reoperation due to bleeding, but lower resource utilization.Future research exploring predictors of extubation readiness may be required prior to widespread adoption of this practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信