Megan E H Still, Sonja Samant, Abraham Alvarado, Dan Neal, Lance S Governale, Jessica A Ching
{"title":"儿科患者颅骨成形术材料选择的考虑。","authors":"Megan E H Still, Sonja Samant, Abraham Alvarado, Dan Neal, Lance S Governale, Jessica A Ching","doi":"10.1159/000528543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimal material and timing of cranioplasty in the pediatric population continue to be debated. Autologous and alloplastic materials have various indications for use and risk factors for complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all pediatric patients who underwent cranioplasty with any material from 1991-2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>149 cranioplasty implants were included. Younger age (6 years old or under), a diagnosis of craniosynostosis as reason for implant, use of autologous bone, and shorter times to cranioplasty were predictive of need for revision surgery. No factors studied had a statistically significant impact on rate of removal of implant at time of revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Autologous and alloplastic cranioplasty materials both have good outcomes with low rates of revision surgery in the pediatric population. Alloplastic implants may be considered in the setting of infection as reason for craniectomy given the lower rate of revision surgery and need for removal. Patients with craniosynostosis as reason for cranioplasty have a higher risk of requiring revision or additional surgeries, regardless of implant used.</p>","PeriodicalId":54631,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Neurosurgery","volume":"58 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations for Choice of Cranioplasty Material for Pediatric Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Megan E H Still, Sonja Samant, Abraham Alvarado, Dan Neal, Lance S Governale, Jessica A Ching\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000528543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimal material and timing of cranioplasty in the pediatric population continue to be debated. Autologous and alloplastic materials have various indications for use and risk factors for complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all pediatric patients who underwent cranioplasty with any material from 1991-2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>149 cranioplasty implants were included. Younger age (6 years old or under), a diagnosis of craniosynostosis as reason for implant, use of autologous bone, and shorter times to cranioplasty were predictive of need for revision surgery. No factors studied had a statistically significant impact on rate of removal of implant at time of revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Autologous and alloplastic cranioplasty materials both have good outcomes with low rates of revision surgery in the pediatric population. Alloplastic implants may be considered in the setting of infection as reason for craniectomy given the lower rate of revision surgery and need for removal. Patients with craniosynostosis as reason for cranioplasty have a higher risk of requiring revision or additional surgeries, regardless of implant used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064395/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528543\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Considerations for Choice of Cranioplasty Material for Pediatric Patients.
Introduction: Optimal material and timing of cranioplasty in the pediatric population continue to be debated. Autologous and alloplastic materials have various indications for use and risk factors for complications.
Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all pediatric patients who underwent cranioplasty with any material from 1991-2021.
Results: 149 cranioplasty implants were included. Younger age (6 years old or under), a diagnosis of craniosynostosis as reason for implant, use of autologous bone, and shorter times to cranioplasty were predictive of need for revision surgery. No factors studied had a statistically significant impact on rate of removal of implant at time of revision surgery.
Conclusion: Autologous and alloplastic cranioplasty materials both have good outcomes with low rates of revision surgery in the pediatric population. Alloplastic implants may be considered in the setting of infection as reason for craniectomy given the lower rate of revision surgery and need for removal. Patients with craniosynostosis as reason for cranioplasty have a higher risk of requiring revision or additional surgeries, regardless of implant used.
期刊介绍：
Articles in ''Pediatric Neurosurgery'' strives to publish new information and observations in pediatric neurosurgery and the allied fields of neurology, neuroradiology and neuropathology as they relate to the etiology of neurologic diseases and the operative care of affected patients. In addition to experimental and clinical studies, the journal presents critical reviews which provide the reader with an update on selected topics as well as case histories and reports on advances in methodology and technique. This thought-provoking focus encourages dissemination of information from neurosurgeons and neuroscientists around the world that will be of interest to clinicians and researchers concerned with pediatric, congenital, and developmental diseases of the nervous system.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
