迈向公平和有弹性的数字初级保健系统:国际比较和前进的见解。

Craig Kuziemsky, Siaw-Teng Liaw, Meredith Leston, Christopher Pearce, Jitendra Jonnagaddala, Simon de Lusignan
{"title":"迈向公平和有弹性的数字初级保健系统:国际比较和前进的见解。","authors":"Craig Kuziemsky,&nbsp;Siaw-Teng Liaw,&nbsp;Meredith Leston,&nbsp;Christopher Pearce,&nbsp;Jitendra Jonnagaddala,&nbsp;Simon de Lusignan","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While the COVID-19 pandemic provided a global stimulus for digital health capacity, its development has often been inequitable, short-term in planning, and lacking in health system coherence. Inclusive digital health and the development of resilient health systems are broad outcomes that require a systematic approach to achieving them. This paper from the IMIA Primary Care Informatics Working Group (WG) provides necessary first steps for the design of a digital primary care system that can support system equity and resilience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report on digital capability and growth in maturity in four key areas: (1) Vaccination/Prevention, (2) Disease management, (3) Surveillance, and (4) Pandemic preparedness for Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom (data from England). Our comparison looks at seasonal influenza management prior to COVID-19 (2019-20) compared to COVID-19 (winter 2020 onwards).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three countries showed growth in digital maturity from the 2019-20 management of influenza to the 2020-21 year and the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the degree of progress was sporadic and uneven and has led to issues of system inequity across populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The opportunity to use the lessons learned from COVID-19 should not be wasted. A digital health infrastructure is not enough on its own to drive health system transformation and to achieve desired outcomes such as system equity and resilience. We must define specific measures to track the growth of digital maturity, including standardized and fit-for-context data that is shared accurately across the health and socioeconomic sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":"31 1","pages":"47-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/8b/10-1055-s-0042-1742502.PMC9719759.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Equitable and Resilient Digital Primary Care Systems: An International Comparison and Insight for Moving Forward.\",\"authors\":\"Craig Kuziemsky,&nbsp;Siaw-Teng Liaw,&nbsp;Meredith Leston,&nbsp;Christopher Pearce,&nbsp;Jitendra Jonnagaddala,&nbsp;Simon de Lusignan\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1742502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While the COVID-19 pandemic provided a global stimulus for digital health capacity, its development has often been inequitable, short-term in planning, and lacking in health system coherence. Inclusive digital health and the development of resilient health systems are broad outcomes that require a systematic approach to achieving them. This paper from the IMIA Primary Care Informatics Working Group (WG) provides necessary first steps for the design of a digital primary care system that can support system equity and resilience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report on digital capability and growth in maturity in four key areas: (1) Vaccination/Prevention, (2) Disease management, (3) Surveillance, and (4) Pandemic preparedness for Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom (data from England). Our comparison looks at seasonal influenza management prior to COVID-19 (2019-20) compared to COVID-19 (winter 2020 onwards).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three countries showed growth in digital maturity from the 2019-20 management of influenza to the 2020-21 year and the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the degree of progress was sporadic and uneven and has led to issues of system inequity across populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The opportunity to use the lessons learned from COVID-19 should not be wasted. A digital health infrastructure is not enough on its own to drive health system transformation and to achieve desired outcomes such as system equity and resilience. We must define specific measures to track the growth of digital maturity, including standardized and fit-for-context data that is shared accurately across the health and socioeconomic sectors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook of medical informatics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"47-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/8b/10-1055-s-0042-1742502.PMC9719759.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook of medical informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目标:虽然2019冠状病毒病大流行为数字卫生能力提供了全球刺激,但其发展往往不公平,规划短期,卫生系统缺乏一致性。包容性数字卫生和发展有复原力的卫生系统是广泛的成果,需要采用系统的方法来实现。IMIA初级保健信息学工作组(WG)的这篇论文为设计一个能够支持系统公平性和弹性的数字初级保健系统提供了必要的第一步。方法:我们报告了澳大利亚、加拿大和英国在四个关键领域的数字化能力和成熟度增长:(1)疫苗接种/预防,(2)疾病管理,(3)监测和(4)大流行防备(数据来自英格兰)。我们的比较着眼于COVID-19(2019-20)之前与COVID-19(2020年冬季以后)之前的季节性流感管理。结果:从2019- 2020年流感管理到2020-21年和2019冠状病毒病大流行管理,这三个国家的数字成熟度都有所提高。然而,进步的程度是零星和不平衡的,并导致了人口之间的制度不平等问题。结论:不应浪费利用2019冠状病毒病经验教训的机会。数字卫生基础设施本身不足以推动卫生系统转型并实现系统公平和复原力等预期结果。我们必须确定具体措施,以跟踪数字成熟度的增长,包括在卫生和社会经济部门之间准确共享标准化和符合背景的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Towards Equitable and Resilient Digital Primary Care Systems: An International Comparison and Insight for Moving Forward.

Towards Equitable and Resilient Digital Primary Care Systems: An International Comparison and Insight for Moving Forward.

Towards Equitable and Resilient Digital Primary Care Systems: An International Comparison and Insight for Moving Forward.

Towards Equitable and Resilient Digital Primary Care Systems: An International Comparison and Insight for Moving Forward.

Objective: While the COVID-19 pandemic provided a global stimulus for digital health capacity, its development has often been inequitable, short-term in planning, and lacking in health system coherence. Inclusive digital health and the development of resilient health systems are broad outcomes that require a systematic approach to achieving them. This paper from the IMIA Primary Care Informatics Working Group (WG) provides necessary first steps for the design of a digital primary care system that can support system equity and resilience.

Methods: We report on digital capability and growth in maturity in four key areas: (1) Vaccination/Prevention, (2) Disease management, (3) Surveillance, and (4) Pandemic preparedness for Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom (data from England). Our comparison looks at seasonal influenza management prior to COVID-19 (2019-20) compared to COVID-19 (winter 2020 onwards).

Results: All three countries showed growth in digital maturity from the 2019-20 management of influenza to the 2020-21 year and the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the degree of progress was sporadic and uneven and has led to issues of system inequity across populations.

Conclusion: The opportunity to use the lessons learned from COVID-19 should not be wasted. A digital health infrastructure is not enough on its own to drive health system transformation and to achieve desired outcomes such as system equity and resilience. We must define specific measures to track the growth of digital maturity, including standardized and fit-for-context data that is shared accurately across the health and socioeconomic sectors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信