确定骨盆标志在评估全髋关节置换术后肢体长度差异中的放射学可靠性。

Walaa Abdelfadeel, Mahamud A Ahmed, Arjun Saxena, Andrew M Star
{"title":"确定骨盆标志在评估全髋关节置换术后肢体长度差异中的放射学可靠性。","authors":"Walaa Abdelfadeel,&nbsp;Mahamud A Ahmed,&nbsp;Arjun Saxena,&nbsp;Andrew M Star","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is a frequent complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) often associated with patient dissatisfaction. Radiographic landmarks are commonly used to determine limb length, but their reliability and accuracy remain to be validated. One-hundred and sixty-two preoperative standing pelvic radiographs from patients undergoing THA were measured using four common landmarks (teardrop, ischial tuberosity, obturator foramen, and iliac crest.) LLD and angular differences between measurements were obtained. Comparison of these landmarks for measuring leg lengths showed weak correlation and wide ranges of LLD for each method - in some cases differing by 30 mm. Angular comparisons showed similar results. Surgeons should be cautioned that there is no standard and reliable method for radiographic measurement of leg length in association with hip replacement surgery and use of these techniques in clinical and research settings should be approached cautiously. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(1):028-031, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":17143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"32 1","pages":"28-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining Radiographic Reliability of Pelvic Landmarks in Assessing Limb Length Discrepancy Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Walaa Abdelfadeel,&nbsp;Mahamud A Ahmed,&nbsp;Arjun Saxena,&nbsp;Andrew M Star\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is a frequent complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) often associated with patient dissatisfaction. Radiographic landmarks are commonly used to determine limb length, but their reliability and accuracy remain to be validated. One-hundred and sixty-two preoperative standing pelvic radiographs from patients undergoing THA were measured using four common landmarks (teardrop, ischial tuberosity, obturator foramen, and iliac crest.) LLD and angular differences between measurements were obtained. Comparison of these landmarks for measuring leg lengths showed weak correlation and wide ranges of LLD for each method - in some cases differing by 30 mm. Angular comparisons showed similar results. Surgeons should be cautioned that there is no standard and reliable method for radiographic measurement of leg length in association with hip replacement surgery and use of these techniques in clinical and research settings should be approached cautiously. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(1):028-031, 2023).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"28-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肢体长度差异(LLD)是全髋关节置换术(THA)后常见的并发症,通常与患者不满有关。影像学标志通常用于确定肢体长度,但其可靠性和准确性仍有待验证。采用四种常见标志(泪滴、坐骨结节、闭孔和髂骨)测量了接受THA患者的162张术前站立骨盆x线片。测量得到LLD和角差。这些测量腿长的标志的比较表明,每种方法的LLD范围很广,相关性很弱,在某些情况下相差30毫米。角度比较显示了类似的结果。外科医生需要注意的是,在髋关节置换术中没有标准可靠的放射学测量腿长方法,在临床和研究中使用这些技术时应谨慎。[j] .外科骨科进展,32(1):028-031,2023。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining Radiographic Reliability of Pelvic Landmarks in Assessing Limb Length Discrepancy Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is a frequent complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) often associated with patient dissatisfaction. Radiographic landmarks are commonly used to determine limb length, but their reliability and accuracy remain to be validated. One-hundred and sixty-two preoperative standing pelvic radiographs from patients undergoing THA were measured using four common landmarks (teardrop, ischial tuberosity, obturator foramen, and iliac crest.) LLD and angular differences between measurements were obtained. Comparison of these landmarks for measuring leg lengths showed weak correlation and wide ranges of LLD for each method - in some cases differing by 30 mm. Angular comparisons showed similar results. Surgeons should be cautioned that there is no standard and reliable method for radiographic measurement of leg length in association with hip replacement surgery and use of these techniques in clinical and research settings should be approached cautiously. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(1):028-031, 2023).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信