心肌梗死后婚姻/伴侣状况与患者报告结果的关联:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

Cenjing Zhu, Phoebe M Tran, Erica C Leifheit, Erica S Spatz, Rachel P Dreyer, Kate Nyhan, Shi-Yi Wang, Judith H Lichtman
{"title":"心肌梗死后婚姻/伴侣状况与患者报告结果的关联:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Cenjing Zhu,&nbsp;Phoebe M Tran,&nbsp;Erica C Leifheit,&nbsp;Erica S Spatz,&nbsp;Rachel P Dreyer,&nbsp;Kate Nyhan,&nbsp;Shi-Yi Wang,&nbsp;Judith H Lichtman","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Little is known about the relationship between marital/partner status and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following myocardial infarction (MI). We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis and explored potential sex differences.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We searched five databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) from inception to 27 July 2022. Peer-reviewed studies of MI patients that evaluated marital/partner status as an independent variable and reported its associations with defined PROMs were eligible for inclusion. Results for eligible studies were classified into four pre-specified outcome domains [health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional status, symptoms, and personal recovery (i.e. self-efficacy, adherence, and purpose/hope)]. Study quality was appraised using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and data were synthesized by outcome domains. We conducted subgroup analysis by sex. We included 34 studies (<i>n</i> = 16 712), of which 11 were included in meta-analyses. Being married/partnered was significantly associated with higher HRQoL {six studies [<i>n</i> = 2734]; pooled standardized mean difference, 0.37 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.63], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 51%} but not depression [three studies (<i>n</i> = 2005); pooled odds ratio, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.32-1.64); <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 65%] or self-efficacy [two studies (<i>n</i> = 356); pooled <i>β</i>, 0.03 (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.14); <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%]. The associations of marital/partner status with functional status, personal recovery outcomes, and symptoms of anxiety and fatigue were mixed. Sex differences were not evident due to mixed results from the available studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Married/partnered MI patients had higher HRQoL than unpartnered patients, but the associations with functional, symptom, and personal recovery outcomes and sex differences were less clear. Our findings inform better methodological approaches and standardized reporting to facilitate future research on these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":11973,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/da/oead018.PMC10023828.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of marital/partner status and patient-reported outcomes following myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Cenjing Zhu,&nbsp;Phoebe M Tran,&nbsp;Erica C Leifheit,&nbsp;Erica S Spatz,&nbsp;Rachel P Dreyer,&nbsp;Kate Nyhan,&nbsp;Shi-Yi Wang,&nbsp;Judith H Lichtman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oead018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Little is known about the relationship between marital/partner status and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following myocardial infarction (MI). We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis and explored potential sex differences.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We searched five databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) from inception to 27 July 2022. Peer-reviewed studies of MI patients that evaluated marital/partner status as an independent variable and reported its associations with defined PROMs were eligible for inclusion. Results for eligible studies were classified into four pre-specified outcome domains [health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional status, symptoms, and personal recovery (i.e. self-efficacy, adherence, and purpose/hope)]. Study quality was appraised using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and data were synthesized by outcome domains. We conducted subgroup analysis by sex. We included 34 studies (<i>n</i> = 16 712), of which 11 were included in meta-analyses. Being married/partnered was significantly associated with higher HRQoL {six studies [<i>n</i> = 2734]; pooled standardized mean difference, 0.37 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.63], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 51%} but not depression [three studies (<i>n</i> = 2005); pooled odds ratio, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.32-1.64); <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 65%] or self-efficacy [two studies (<i>n</i> = 356); pooled <i>β</i>, 0.03 (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.14); <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%]. The associations of marital/partner status with functional status, personal recovery outcomes, and symptoms of anxiety and fatigue were mixed. Sex differences were not evident due to mixed results from the available studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Married/partnered MI patients had higher HRQoL than unpartnered patients, but the associations with functional, symptom, and personal recovery outcomes and sex differences were less clear. Our findings inform better methodological approaches and standardized reporting to facilitate future research on these relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/da/oead018.PMC10023828.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人们对心肌梗死(MI)后婚姻/伴侣状况与患者报告的预后指标(PROMs)之间的关系知之甚少。我们进行了系统回顾/荟萃分析,并探讨了潜在的性别差异。方法与结果:我们检索了Medline、Web of Science、Scopus、EMBASE和PsycINFO 5个数据库,检索时间为2022年7月27日。将婚姻/伴侣状态评估为自变量并报告其与定义的prom相关的同行评议的MI患者研究符合纳入条件。符合条件的研究结果被分为四个预先指定的结果域[健康相关生活质量(HRQoL),功能状态,症状和个人恢复(即自我效能,依从性和目的/希望)]。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评价研究质量,并根据结果域综合数据。我们按性别进行了亚组分析。我们纳入34项研究(n = 16712),其中11项纳入meta分析。已婚/有伴侣与较高的HRQoL显著相关[6项研究[n = 2734];合并标准化平均差为0.37[95%可信区间(CI), 0.12-0.63], i2 = 51%},但无抑郁症[3项研究(n = 2005)];合并优势比,0.72 (95% CI, 0.32-1.64);[2 = 65%]或自我效能[2项研究(n = 356);合并β, 0.03 (95% CI, -0.09至0.14);i2 = 0%]。婚姻/伴侣状态与功能状态、个人康复结果、焦虑和疲劳症状的关系是混合的。由于现有研究的结果不一,性别差异并不明显。结论:已婚/有伴侣的心肌梗死患者的HRQoL高于无伴侣的患者,但与功能、症状、个人康复结果和性别差异的关系不太清楚。我们的研究结果为更好的方法方法和标准化报告提供了信息,以促进对这些关系的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association of marital/partner status and patient-reported outcomes following myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Association of marital/partner status and patient-reported outcomes following myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Association of marital/partner status and patient-reported outcomes following myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Association of marital/partner status and patient-reported outcomes following myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aims: Little is known about the relationship between marital/partner status and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following myocardial infarction (MI). We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis and explored potential sex differences.

Methods and results: We searched five databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) from inception to 27 July 2022. Peer-reviewed studies of MI patients that evaluated marital/partner status as an independent variable and reported its associations with defined PROMs were eligible for inclusion. Results for eligible studies were classified into four pre-specified outcome domains [health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional status, symptoms, and personal recovery (i.e. self-efficacy, adherence, and purpose/hope)]. Study quality was appraised using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and data were synthesized by outcome domains. We conducted subgroup analysis by sex. We included 34 studies (n = 16 712), of which 11 were included in meta-analyses. Being married/partnered was significantly associated with higher HRQoL {six studies [n = 2734]; pooled standardized mean difference, 0.37 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.63], I 2 = 51%} but not depression [three studies (n = 2005); pooled odds ratio, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.32-1.64); I 2 = 65%] or self-efficacy [two studies (n = 356); pooled β, 0.03 (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.14); I 2 = 0%]. The associations of marital/partner status with functional status, personal recovery outcomes, and symptoms of anxiety and fatigue were mixed. Sex differences were not evident due to mixed results from the available studies.

Conclusions: Married/partnered MI patients had higher HRQoL than unpartnered patients, but the associations with functional, symptom, and personal recovery outcomes and sex differences were less clear. Our findings inform better methodological approaches and standardized reporting to facilitate future research on these relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信