加巴喷丁联合巴氯芬治疗住院患者酒精戒断综合征的疗效评价。

Kristina Karapetyan, Zachary Rosenfeldt, Kaylee Caniff
{"title":"加巴喷丁联合巴氯芬治疗住院患者酒精戒断综合征的疗效评价。","authors":"Kristina Karapetyan,&nbsp;Zachary Rosenfeldt,&nbsp;Kaylee Caniff","doi":"10.12788/fp.0362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzodiazepines are considered the gold standard for treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), a group of symptoms that occur after abrupt cessation of alcohol use, but may be associated with serious adverse effects. Given the safety concerns, alternative treatment options for AWS management have been investigated, including gabapentin and baclofen. Because no available studies have investigated the inpatient use of the gabapentin and baclofen combination for alcohol detoxification, this study aims to evaluate their efficacy and safety in the inpatient hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study at the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center in North Chicago, Illinois, included patients who were aged ≥ 18 years and who were admitted to the general acute medicine floor for the primary indication of AWS from January 1, 2014, to July 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the length of stay, defined as hours from admission to either discharge or 36 hours with a Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol (CIWA) score ≤ 8. Electronic health records were reviewed to collect CIWA scores, alcohol withdrawal seizure and delirium tremens incidence, rates of conversions from gabapentin/baclofen to lorazepam, rates of transitions to a higher level of care, and readmission for AWS within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean length of stay in the gabapentin/baclofen group was statistically significantly shorter compared with the benzodiazepine group (42.6 vs 82.5 hours, <i>P</i> < .001). The study found no significant difference between the gabapentin/baclofen and benzodiazepine groups in AWS readmission, adjuvant medications for AWS management, and number of patients who transitioned to a higher level of care. Overall, the safety of gabapentin/baclofen vs benzodiazepine were comparable; however, 1 patient experienced a seizure, and 1 patient experienced delirium tremens during admission in the benzodiazepine group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gabapentin/baclofen combination seems to be an effective and safe alternative to benzodiazepines and may be considered for managing mild AWS in hospitalized patients, but additional research is needed to examine this regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"40 4","pages":"128-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202137/pdf/fp-40-04-128.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Gabapentin and Baclofen Combination for Inpatient Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Karapetyan,&nbsp;Zachary Rosenfeldt,&nbsp;Kaylee Caniff\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzodiazepines are considered the gold standard for treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), a group of symptoms that occur after abrupt cessation of alcohol use, but may be associated with serious adverse effects. Given the safety concerns, alternative treatment options for AWS management have been investigated, including gabapentin and baclofen. Because no available studies have investigated the inpatient use of the gabapentin and baclofen combination for alcohol detoxification, this study aims to evaluate their efficacy and safety in the inpatient hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study at the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center in North Chicago, Illinois, included patients who were aged ≥ 18 years and who were admitted to the general acute medicine floor for the primary indication of AWS from January 1, 2014, to July 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the length of stay, defined as hours from admission to either discharge or 36 hours with a Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol (CIWA) score ≤ 8. Electronic health records were reviewed to collect CIWA scores, alcohol withdrawal seizure and delirium tremens incidence, rates of conversions from gabapentin/baclofen to lorazepam, rates of transitions to a higher level of care, and readmission for AWS within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean length of stay in the gabapentin/baclofen group was statistically significantly shorter compared with the benzodiazepine group (42.6 vs 82.5 hours, <i>P</i> < .001). The study found no significant difference between the gabapentin/baclofen and benzodiazepine groups in AWS readmission, adjuvant medications for AWS management, and number of patients who transitioned to a higher level of care. Overall, the safety of gabapentin/baclofen vs benzodiazepine were comparable; however, 1 patient experienced a seizure, and 1 patient experienced delirium tremens during admission in the benzodiazepine group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gabapentin/baclofen combination seems to be an effective and safe alternative to benzodiazepines and may be considered for managing mild AWS in hospitalized patients, but additional research is needed to examine this regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"128-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202137/pdf/fp-40-04-128.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:苯二氮卓类药物被认为是治疗酒精戒断综合征(AWS)的金标准,这是一组在突然停止使用酒精后出现的症状,但可能与严重的不良反应有关。考虑到安全性问题,已经研究了替代治疗方案,包括加巴喷丁和巴氯芬。由于目前尚无研究调查住院患者使用加巴喷丁和巴氯芬联合治疗酒精解毒,本研究旨在评估其在住院医院环境中的有效性和安全性。方法:这项回顾性队列研究在伊利诺伊州北芝加哥的James A. Lovell上尉联邦卫生保健中心进行,纳入了2014年1月1日至2021年7月31日期间因主要适应证AWS而入住普通急性医学病房的年龄≥18岁的患者。主要终点是住院时间,定义为从入院到出院的小时数或临床研究所酒精戒断评估(CIWA)评分≤8的36小时。回顾电子健康记录,收集CIWA评分、酒精戒断性发作和震颤性谵妄发生率、从加巴喷丁/巴氯芬到劳拉西泮的转换率、过渡到更高级别护理的比率以及30天内AWS的再入院率。结果:加巴喷丁/巴氯芬组的平均住院时间较苯二氮卓组有统计学意义(42.6 h vs 82.5 h, P < 0.001)。研究发现加巴喷丁/巴氯芬组和苯二氮卓组在AWS再入院、AWS管理的辅助用药以及转移到更高级别护理的患者数量方面没有显著差异。总体而言,加巴喷丁/巴氯芬与苯二氮卓的安全性相当;然而,在入院期间,苯二氮卓组有1例患者发生癫痫发作,1例患者发生震颤谵妄。结论:加巴喷丁/巴氯芬联合用药似乎是苯二氮卓类药物的一种有效和安全的替代方案,可以考虑用于治疗住院患者的轻度AWS,但需要进一步的研究来检验该方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Gabapentin and Baclofen Combination for Inpatient Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.

Background: Benzodiazepines are considered the gold standard for treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), a group of symptoms that occur after abrupt cessation of alcohol use, but may be associated with serious adverse effects. Given the safety concerns, alternative treatment options for AWS management have been investigated, including gabapentin and baclofen. Because no available studies have investigated the inpatient use of the gabapentin and baclofen combination for alcohol detoxification, this study aims to evaluate their efficacy and safety in the inpatient hospital setting.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study at the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center in North Chicago, Illinois, included patients who were aged ≥ 18 years and who were admitted to the general acute medicine floor for the primary indication of AWS from January 1, 2014, to July 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the length of stay, defined as hours from admission to either discharge or 36 hours with a Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol (CIWA) score ≤ 8. Electronic health records were reviewed to collect CIWA scores, alcohol withdrawal seizure and delirium tremens incidence, rates of conversions from gabapentin/baclofen to lorazepam, rates of transitions to a higher level of care, and readmission for AWS within 30 days.

Results: Mean length of stay in the gabapentin/baclofen group was statistically significantly shorter compared with the benzodiazepine group (42.6 vs 82.5 hours, P < .001). The study found no significant difference between the gabapentin/baclofen and benzodiazepine groups in AWS readmission, adjuvant medications for AWS management, and number of patients who transitioned to a higher level of care. Overall, the safety of gabapentin/baclofen vs benzodiazepine were comparable; however, 1 patient experienced a seizure, and 1 patient experienced delirium tremens during admission in the benzodiazepine group.

Conclusions: Gabapentin/baclofen combination seems to be an effective and safe alternative to benzodiazepines and may be considered for managing mild AWS in hospitalized patients, but additional research is needed to examine this regimen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信