根据2012年或2020年IADT指南对脱牙和再植恒牙存活率的回顾性分析。

Q2 Medicine
Liliane Roskamp, Camila Paiva Perin, Juliana Pierdoná de Castro, Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos, Maria Carolina Botellho Pires de Campos, Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo, Sérgio Aparecido Ignácio, Maria Eduarda Nunis Locks, Vânia Portela Ditzel Westphalen, Flares Baratto-Filho
{"title":"根据2012年或2020年IADT指南对脱牙和再植恒牙存活率的回顾性分析。","authors":"Liliane Roskamp,&nbsp;Camila Paiva Perin,&nbsp;Juliana Pierdoná de Castro,&nbsp;Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos,&nbsp;Maria Carolina Botellho Pires de Campos,&nbsp;Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo,&nbsp;Sérgio Aparecido Ignácio,&nbsp;Maria Eduarda Nunis Locks,&nbsp;Vânia Portela Ditzel Westphalen,&nbsp;Flares Baratto-Filho","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202305255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the survival of replanted teeth that followed the 2012 or the 2020 International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines. Sixty-two permanent replanted teeth were retrospectively assessed (IADT 2012, n = 45; IADT 2020, n = 17). Five years after replantation (from January 2017 to December 2021), clinical and radiographic examinations were performed. A significance level of 95% was considered to evaluate the outcomes. Thirty-one teeth (50.0%) remained in their sockets and 31 (50.0%) were lost due to external root resorption. Of the 25 (40.3%) teeth replanted within one hour, 16 (64.0%) remained in their sockets, and 9 (36.0%) were lost. Twenty-two (71.0%) of all 31 lost teeth had an extra-alveolar time of more than one hour. Twelve teeth remained in their sockets without resorption: 8 (66.7%) were replanted within one hour, 2 (16.7%) followed the 2012 IADT, and 2 (16.7%) the 2020 IADT guidelines for late replantation. There was a significant difference (p <0.05) in the extra-alveolar time (< one hour), but without difference between the guidelines in late replantation (p > 0.05). Replanted teeth following both, 2012 or 2020 IADT guidelines, have similar clinical outcomes. The extra-alveolar time of less than one hour was demonstrated to be important to keep the permanent tooth in its socket.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"34 2","pages":"122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective analysis of survival of avulsed and replanted permanent teeth according to 2012 or 2020 IADT Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Liliane Roskamp,&nbsp;Camila Paiva Perin,&nbsp;Juliana Pierdoná de Castro,&nbsp;Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos,&nbsp;Maria Carolina Botellho Pires de Campos,&nbsp;Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo,&nbsp;Sérgio Aparecido Ignácio,&nbsp;Maria Eduarda Nunis Locks,&nbsp;Vânia Portela Ditzel Westphalen,&nbsp;Flares Baratto-Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6440202305255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the survival of replanted teeth that followed the 2012 or the 2020 International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines. Sixty-two permanent replanted teeth were retrospectively assessed (IADT 2012, n = 45; IADT 2020, n = 17). Five years after replantation (from January 2017 to December 2021), clinical and radiographic examinations were performed. A significance level of 95% was considered to evaluate the outcomes. Thirty-one teeth (50.0%) remained in their sockets and 31 (50.0%) were lost due to external root resorption. Of the 25 (40.3%) teeth replanted within one hour, 16 (64.0%) remained in their sockets, and 9 (36.0%) were lost. Twenty-two (71.0%) of all 31 lost teeth had an extra-alveolar time of more than one hour. Twelve teeth remained in their sockets without resorption: 8 (66.7%) were replanted within one hour, 2 (16.7%) followed the 2012 IADT, and 2 (16.7%) the 2020 IADT guidelines for late replantation. There was a significant difference (p <0.05) in the extra-alveolar time (< one hour), but without difference between the guidelines in late replantation (p > 0.05). Replanted teeth following both, 2012 or 2020 IADT guidelines, have similar clinical outcomes. The extra-alveolar time of less than one hour was demonstrated to be important to keep the permanent tooth in its socket.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"122-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208297/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较遵循2012年或2020年国际牙科创伤协会(IADT)指南的再植牙齿的存活率。回顾性评估62颗永久再植牙(IADT 2012, n = 45;IADT 2020, n = 17)。再植后5年(2017年1月至2021年12月),进行临床和影像学检查。以95%的显著性水平评价结果。31颗(50.0%)牙保留在牙槽内,31颗(50.0%)牙因外根吸收而丢失。1小时内再植25颗(40.3%),16颗(64.0%)留在牙槽内,9颗(36.0%)脱落。31颗脱落牙中有22颗(71.0%)牙槽外时间超过1小时。12颗牙保持在牙槽内未被吸收:8颗(66.7%)在1小时内再植,2颗(16.7%)遵循2012年IADT指南,2颗(16.7%)遵循2020年IADT指南晚期再植。差异有统计学意义(p 0.05)。遵循2012年或2020年IADT指南的牙齿再植具有相似的临床结果。牙槽外少于一小时的时间对恒牙保持在牙槽内是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective analysis of survival of avulsed and replanted permanent teeth according to 2012 or 2020 IADT Guidelines.

This study aimed to compare the survival of replanted teeth that followed the 2012 or the 2020 International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines. Sixty-two permanent replanted teeth were retrospectively assessed (IADT 2012, n = 45; IADT 2020, n = 17). Five years after replantation (from January 2017 to December 2021), clinical and radiographic examinations were performed. A significance level of 95% was considered to evaluate the outcomes. Thirty-one teeth (50.0%) remained in their sockets and 31 (50.0%) were lost due to external root resorption. Of the 25 (40.3%) teeth replanted within one hour, 16 (64.0%) remained in their sockets, and 9 (36.0%) were lost. Twenty-two (71.0%) of all 31 lost teeth had an extra-alveolar time of more than one hour. Twelve teeth remained in their sockets without resorption: 8 (66.7%) were replanted within one hour, 2 (16.7%) followed the 2012 IADT, and 2 (16.7%) the 2020 IADT guidelines for late replantation. There was a significant difference (p <0.05) in the extra-alveolar time (< one hour), but without difference between the guidelines in late replantation (p > 0.05). Replanted teeth following both, 2012 or 2020 IADT guidelines, have similar clinical outcomes. The extra-alveolar time of less than one hour was demonstrated to be important to keep the permanent tooth in its socket.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian dental journal
Brazilian dental journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信