慢性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前主动脉内脉压测量的预后作用:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Halil Aktas, Murat Gul
{"title":"慢性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前主动脉内脉压测量的预后作用:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究","authors":"Halil Aktas,&nbsp;Murat Gul","doi":"10.1080/10641963.2022.2043893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between pulse pressure and prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is contradictory. In the present study, we aimed to examine the relationship between intra-aortic pulse pressure (IAPP) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with CCS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 139 CCS patients who underwent elective PCI with regular one-year follow-up, were stratified into two subgroups according to IAPP. The primary outcomes included the occurrence of MACE, defined as cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI), acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 57.6 ± 10.4 years, 32% of whom were female. The mean IAPP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 54.0 ± 17.6 mmHg, 129.7 ± 20 mmHg, and 75.8 ± 11.8 mmHg, respectively. SBP, IAPP, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly higher in the high IAPP group (p < .001, p < .001, p = .001, respectively). The MACE rate was significantly higher in the low IAPP group than in the high IAPP group (30.4% vs. 8.6%, p = 0,001). The LVEF (OR = 0.93, CI:0.88-0.99, p = .025) and IAPP (OR = 0.89, CI:0.83-0.95, p = .001) were found to be independent predictors of MACE. The IAPP value of 39.5 mmHg was identified as an effective cutoff point for prediction of MACE-free survival rates (AUC:0.853, CI:0.768-0.937).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Invasively measured IAPP has prognostic information about cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CCS. The risk of MACE is significantly greater in CCS patients with low IAPP compared with those who have high IAPP values.</p>","PeriodicalId":10333,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","volume":"44 4","pages":"347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic role of intra-aortic pulse pressure measured before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Halil Aktas,&nbsp;Murat Gul\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10641963.2022.2043893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between pulse pressure and prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is contradictory. In the present study, we aimed to examine the relationship between intra-aortic pulse pressure (IAPP) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with CCS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 139 CCS patients who underwent elective PCI with regular one-year follow-up, were stratified into two subgroups according to IAPP. The primary outcomes included the occurrence of MACE, defined as cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI), acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 57.6 ± 10.4 years, 32% of whom were female. The mean IAPP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 54.0 ± 17.6 mmHg, 129.7 ± 20 mmHg, and 75.8 ± 11.8 mmHg, respectively. SBP, IAPP, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly higher in the high IAPP group (p < .001, p < .001, p = .001, respectively). The MACE rate was significantly higher in the low IAPP group than in the high IAPP group (30.4% vs. 8.6%, p = 0,001). The LVEF (OR = 0.93, CI:0.88-0.99, p = .025) and IAPP (OR = 0.89, CI:0.83-0.95, p = .001) were found to be independent predictors of MACE. The IAPP value of 39.5 mmHg was identified as an effective cutoff point for prediction of MACE-free survival rates (AUC:0.853, CI:0.768-0.937).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Invasively measured IAPP has prognostic information about cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CCS. The risk of MACE is significantly greater in CCS patients with low IAPP compared with those who have high IAPP values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"347-354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2022.2043893\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2022.2043893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脉压与慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者预后的关系是矛盾的。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的CCS患者主动脉内脉压(IAPP)与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间的关系。方法:139例接受选择性PCI的CCS患者,定期随访一年,根据IAPP分为两个亚组。主要结局包括MACE的发生,定义为心血管死亡、急性心肌梗死伴st段抬高(STEMI)、急性心肌梗死无st段抬高(NSTEMI)、靶血管重建术(TVR)和卒中。结果:患者平均年龄57.6±10.4岁,女性占32%。平均IAPP、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)分别为54.0±17.6 mmHg、129.7±20 mmHg和75.8±11.8 mmHg。高IAPP组收缩压、IAPP和左室射血分数(LVEF)显著升高(p)。结论:有创测量IAPP对CCS患者心血管结局有预后信息。与IAPP值高的CCS患者相比,IAPP值低的CCS患者发生MACE的风险明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The prognostic role of intra-aortic pulse pressure measured before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study.

Background: The relationship between pulse pressure and prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is contradictory. In the present study, we aimed to examine the relationship between intra-aortic pulse pressure (IAPP) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with CCS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: A total of 139 CCS patients who underwent elective PCI with regular one-year follow-up, were stratified into two subgroups according to IAPP. The primary outcomes included the occurrence of MACE, defined as cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI), acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 57.6 ± 10.4 years, 32% of whom were female. The mean IAPP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 54.0 ± 17.6 mmHg, 129.7 ± 20 mmHg, and 75.8 ± 11.8 mmHg, respectively. SBP, IAPP, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly higher in the high IAPP group (p < .001, p < .001, p = .001, respectively). The MACE rate was significantly higher in the low IAPP group than in the high IAPP group (30.4% vs. 8.6%, p = 0,001). The LVEF (OR = 0.93, CI:0.88-0.99, p = .025) and IAPP (OR = 0.89, CI:0.83-0.95, p = .001) were found to be independent predictors of MACE. The IAPP value of 39.5 mmHg was identified as an effective cutoff point for prediction of MACE-free survival rates (AUC:0.853, CI:0.768-0.937).

Conclusion: Invasively measured IAPP has prognostic information about cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CCS. The risk of MACE is significantly greater in CCS patients with low IAPP compared with those who have high IAPP values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.80%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is a reputable journal that has converted to a full Open Access format starting from Volume 45 in 2023. While previous volumes are still accessible through a Pay to Read model, the journal now provides free and open access to its content. It serves as an international platform for the exchange of up-to-date scientific and clinical information concerning both human and animal hypertension. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including full research papers, solicited and unsolicited reviews, and commentaries. Through these publications, the journal aims to enhance current understanding and support the timely detection, management, control, and prevention of hypertension-related conditions. One notable aspect of Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is its coverage of special issues that focus on the proceedings of symposia dedicated to hypertension research. This feature allows researchers and clinicians to delve deeper into the latest advancements in this field. The journal is abstracted and indexed in several renowned databases, including Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes News (Online), Reactions Weekly (Online), CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, International Atomic Energy Agency, and the National Library of Medicine, among others. These affiliations ensure that the journal's content receives broad visibility and facilitates its discoverability by professionals and researchers in related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信