小学教师关于儿童哮喘的知识与经验:混合研究。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lilian Brosso, Jaqueline Brosso Zonta, Aline Fernanda Levada, Nayara Gonçalves Barbosa, Regina Aparecida Garcia Lima, Aline Cristiane Cavicchioli Okido
{"title":"小学教师关于儿童哮喘的知识与经验:混合研究。","authors":"Lilian Brosso,&nbsp;Jaqueline Brosso Zonta,&nbsp;Aline Fernanda Levada,&nbsp;Nayara Gonçalves Barbosa,&nbsp;Regina Aparecida Garcia Lima,&nbsp;Aline Cristiane Cavicchioli Okido","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0329en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the knowledge of Primary Education teachers regarding asthma and learn about their experiences with the exacerbation of symptoms at school.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sequential explanatory mixed study. In the quantitative stage, the Newcastle Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire and the characterization instrument were applied. Data analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics. The production of qualitative data occurred from written statements analyzed using the deductive content analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and seven teachers, mostly women (92%) and working in public schools (82%). As for knowledge, 132 (63.8%) had unsatisfactory performance. The questions with the lowest rates of correct answers were about medications used regularly and during the attacks. Teachers with higher scores had less time in the occupation (p = 0.017) and had been diagnosed with asthma (p = 0.006). In the qualitative stage, 35 teachers participated and the statements corroborated the quantitative findings, especially in relation to the knowledge gap and feeling of greater safety among asthmatic teachers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Teachers showed insufficient knowledge and reported fear and unpreparedness in the face of the situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205126/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and experience of Primary Education teachers regarding childhood asthma: mixed study.\",\"authors\":\"Lilian Brosso,&nbsp;Jaqueline Brosso Zonta,&nbsp;Aline Fernanda Levada,&nbsp;Nayara Gonçalves Barbosa,&nbsp;Regina Aparecida Garcia Lima,&nbsp;Aline Cristiane Cavicchioli Okido\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0329en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the knowledge of Primary Education teachers regarding asthma and learn about their experiences with the exacerbation of symptoms at school.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sequential explanatory mixed study. In the quantitative stage, the Newcastle Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire and the characterization instrument were applied. Data analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics. The production of qualitative data occurred from written statements analyzed using the deductive content analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and seven teachers, mostly women (92%) and working in public schools (82%). As for knowledge, 132 (63.8%) had unsatisfactory performance. The questions with the lowest rates of correct answers were about medications used regularly and during the attacks. Teachers with higher scores had less time in the occupation (p = 0.017) and had been diagnosed with asthma (p = 0.006). In the qualitative stage, 35 teachers participated and the statements corroborated the quantitative findings, especially in relation to the knowledge gap and feeling of greater safety among asthmatic teachers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Teachers showed insufficient knowledge and reported fear and unpreparedness in the face of the situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205126/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0329en\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0329en","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:分析小学教师对哮喘的认知情况,了解小学教师在校期间哮喘症状加重的经历。方法:顺序解释混合研究。在定量阶段,使用纽卡斯尔哮喘知识问卷和表征工具。通过描述性和推断性统计分析数据。定性数据的产生来自使用演绎内容分析法分析的书面陈述。结果:277名教师,大部分是女性(92%),在公立学校工作(82%)。在知识方面,132人(63.8%)表现不理想。正确率最低的问题是关于定期用药和发作期间用药的问题。得分越高的教师在职业中的时间越少(p = 0.017),被诊断患有哮喘(p = 0.006)。在定性阶段,有35名教师参与,这些陈述证实了定量调查结果,特别是哮喘教师的知识差距和安全感。结论:教师在面对这种情况时表现出缺乏足够的知识和恐惧和准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Knowledge and experience of Primary Education teachers regarding childhood asthma: mixed study.

Knowledge and experience of Primary Education teachers regarding childhood asthma: mixed study.

Objective: To analyze the knowledge of Primary Education teachers regarding asthma and learn about their experiences with the exacerbation of symptoms at school.

Method: Sequential explanatory mixed study. In the quantitative stage, the Newcastle Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire and the characterization instrument were applied. Data analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics. The production of qualitative data occurred from written statements analyzed using the deductive content analysis method.

Results: Two hundred and seven teachers, mostly women (92%) and working in public schools (82%). As for knowledge, 132 (63.8%) had unsatisfactory performance. The questions with the lowest rates of correct answers were about medications used regularly and during the attacks. Teachers with higher scores had less time in the occupation (p = 0.017) and had been diagnosed with asthma (p = 0.006). In the qualitative stage, 35 teachers participated and the statements corroborated the quantitative findings, especially in relation to the knowledge gap and feeling of greater safety among asthmatic teachers.

Conclusion: Teachers showed insufficient knowledge and reported fear and unpreparedness in the face of the situation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信