用EFLM标准和CRESS检查表测定常规血液学试验的体外稳定性。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1177/00045632231177247
Robert D Williams, Christopher J Duff, Alexandra Yates
{"title":"用EFLM标准和CRESS检查表测定常规血液学试验的体外稳定性。","authors":"Robert D Williams, Christopher J Duff, Alexandra Yates","doi":"10.1177/00045632231177247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratories should be aware of the stability of the analytes they are testing in order to avoid incorrect reporting and patient management. Stability studies are difficult to interpret and reproduce, with little guidance on how to determine appropriate clinical cut off values. Here we describe a standardised approach to determining stability for routine haematinics tests using published EFLM guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The haematinics panel at UHNM contains vitamin B12, folate, ferritin, iron and transferrin. Blood tubes included were serum separator tubes, gel-free serum and lithium-heparin plasma. Conditions tested were room temperature, 2-8°C and -20°C. For each condition and tube, three samples were analysed in duplicate at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h using the Siemens Atellica platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage difference was calculated for each respective blood tube and storage condition, in addition to individual analyte maximum permissible instability scores. The majority of analytes for all blood tubes were stable for 5 days or more when stored at 4-8°C and -20°C. Ferritin (excluding gel-free), iron and transferrin further showed stability >5 days when stored at room temperature. However, vitamin B12 and folate demonstrated poor stability data for all tube types tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Here we describe a stability study for the haematinics panel on the Siemens Atellica platform using the standardised EFLM Checklist for Reporting Stability Studies (CRESS). The checklist was used in order to promote a standardised and transferable scientific approach to what has previously been lacking in the literature when performing stability experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"367-373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of in vitro stability of routine haematinics tests using EFLM standards and the CRESS checklist.\",\"authors\":\"Robert D Williams, Christopher J Duff, Alexandra Yates\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632231177247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratories should be aware of the stability of the analytes they are testing in order to avoid incorrect reporting and patient management. Stability studies are difficult to interpret and reproduce, with little guidance on how to determine appropriate clinical cut off values. Here we describe a standardised approach to determining stability for routine haematinics tests using published EFLM guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The haematinics panel at UHNM contains vitamin B12, folate, ferritin, iron and transferrin. Blood tubes included were serum separator tubes, gel-free serum and lithium-heparin plasma. Conditions tested were room temperature, 2-8°C and -20°C. For each condition and tube, three samples were analysed in duplicate at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h using the Siemens Atellica platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage difference was calculated for each respective blood tube and storage condition, in addition to individual analyte maximum permissible instability scores. The majority of analytes for all blood tubes were stable for 5 days or more when stored at 4-8°C and -20°C. Ferritin (excluding gel-free), iron and transferrin further showed stability >5 days when stored at room temperature. However, vitamin B12 and folate demonstrated poor stability data for all tube types tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Here we describe a stability study for the haematinics panel on the Siemens Atellica platform using the standardised EFLM Checklist for Reporting Stability Studies (CRESS). The checklist was used in order to promote a standardised and transferable scientific approach to what has previously been lacking in the literature when performing stability experiments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"367-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231177247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231177247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实验室应该意识到他们正在测试的分析物的稳定性,以避免不正确的报告和患者管理。稳定性研究很难解释和重现,很少有关于如何确定适当的临床临界值的指导。在这里,我们描述了一种标准化的方法来确定常规血液学测试的稳定性,使用已出版的EFLM指南。方法:UHNM血液学组含有维生素B12、叶酸、铁蛋白、铁和转铁蛋白。血管包括血清分离管、无凝胶血清和锂肝素血浆。测试条件为室温、2-8°C和-20°C。对于每种条件和试管,使用西门子Atellica平台在0、24、48、72、96和120 h时重复分析三个样本。结果:除了个别分析物最大允许不稳定性评分外,还计算了每个各自的血管和储存条件的百分比差异。在4-8°C和-20°C保存时,所有血管的大多数分析物在5天或更长时间内稳定。铁蛋白(不含无凝胶)、铁和转铁蛋白在室温下保存50天后表现出稳定性。然而,维生素B12和叶酸在所有试管类型的测试中显示出较差的稳定性数据。结论:在这里,我们描述了西门子Atellica平台上使用标准化EFLM报告稳定性研究清单(CRESS)的血液学面板的稳定性研究。使用清单是为了促进标准化和可转移的科学方法,以解决以前在进行稳定性实验时文献中所缺乏的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of in vitro stability of routine haematinics tests using EFLM standards and the CRESS checklist.

Background: Laboratories should be aware of the stability of the analytes they are testing in order to avoid incorrect reporting and patient management. Stability studies are difficult to interpret and reproduce, with little guidance on how to determine appropriate clinical cut off values. Here we describe a standardised approach to determining stability for routine haematinics tests using published EFLM guidelines.

Methods: The haematinics panel at UHNM contains vitamin B12, folate, ferritin, iron and transferrin. Blood tubes included were serum separator tubes, gel-free serum and lithium-heparin plasma. Conditions tested were room temperature, 2-8°C and -20°C. For each condition and tube, three samples were analysed in duplicate at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h using the Siemens Atellica platform.

Results: The percentage difference was calculated for each respective blood tube and storage condition, in addition to individual analyte maximum permissible instability scores. The majority of analytes for all blood tubes were stable for 5 days or more when stored at 4-8°C and -20°C. Ferritin (excluding gel-free), iron and transferrin further showed stability >5 days when stored at room temperature. However, vitamin B12 and folate demonstrated poor stability data for all tube types tested.

Conclusions: Here we describe a stability study for the haematinics panel on the Siemens Atellica platform using the standardised EFLM Checklist for Reporting Stability Studies (CRESS). The checklist was used in order to promote a standardised and transferable scientific approach to what has previously been lacking in the literature when performing stability experiments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信