作为市场的医疗保健领域:巴基斯坦全科医生、制药公司和以利润为导向的处方。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Muhammad Naveed Noor, Marco Liverani, Joanne Bryant, Afifah Rahman-Shepherd, Sabeen Sharif, Wafa Aftab, Sadia Shakoor, Mishal Khan, Rumina Hasan
{"title":"作为市场的医疗保健领域:巴基斯坦全科医生、制药公司和以利润为导向的处方。","authors":"Muhammad Naveed Noor,&nbsp;Marco Liverani,&nbsp;Joanne Bryant,&nbsp;Afifah Rahman-Shepherd,&nbsp;Sabeen Sharif,&nbsp;Wafa Aftab,&nbsp;Sadia Shakoor,&nbsp;Mishal Khan,&nbsp;Rumina Hasan","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2022.2139628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incentivisation of general practitioners (GPs) by pharmaceutical companies is thought to affect prescribing practices, often not in patients' interest. Using a Bourdieusian lens, we examine the socially structured conditions that underpin exchanges between pharmaceutical companies and GPs in Pakistan. The analysis of qualitative interviews with 28 GPs and 13 pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) shows that GPs, through prescribing medicines, met pharmaceutical sales targets in exchange for various incentives. We argue that these practices can be given meaning through the concept of 'field' - a social space in which GPs, PSRs, and pharmacists were hierarchically positioned, with their unique capacities, to enable healthcare provision. However, structural forces like the intense competition between pharmaceutical companies, the presence of unqualified healthcare providers in the healthcare market, and a lack of regulation by the state institutions produced a context that enabled pharmaceutical companies and GPs to use the healthcare field, also, as space to maximise profits. GPs believed the effort to maximise incomes and meet socially desired standards were two key factors that encouraged profit-led prescribing. We conclude that understanding the healthcare field is an important step toward developing governance practices that can address profit-led prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The healthcare field as a marketplace: general practitioners, pharmaceutical companies, and profit-led prescribing in Pakistan.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Naveed Noor,&nbsp;Marco Liverani,&nbsp;Joanne Bryant,&nbsp;Afifah Rahman-Shepherd,&nbsp;Sabeen Sharif,&nbsp;Wafa Aftab,&nbsp;Sadia Shakoor,&nbsp;Mishal Khan,&nbsp;Rumina Hasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14461242.2022.2139628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Incentivisation of general practitioners (GPs) by pharmaceutical companies is thought to affect prescribing practices, often not in patients' interest. Using a Bourdieusian lens, we examine the socially structured conditions that underpin exchanges between pharmaceutical companies and GPs in Pakistan. The analysis of qualitative interviews with 28 GPs and 13 pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) shows that GPs, through prescribing medicines, met pharmaceutical sales targets in exchange for various incentives. We argue that these practices can be given meaning through the concept of 'field' - a social space in which GPs, PSRs, and pharmacists were hierarchically positioned, with their unique capacities, to enable healthcare provision. However, structural forces like the intense competition between pharmaceutical companies, the presence of unqualified healthcare providers in the healthcare market, and a lack of regulation by the state institutions produced a context that enabled pharmaceutical companies and GPs to use the healthcare field, also, as space to maximise profits. GPs believed the effort to maximise incomes and meet socially desired standards were two key factors that encouraged profit-led prescribing. We conclude that understanding the healthcare field is an important step toward developing governance practices that can address profit-led prescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2022.2139628\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2022.2139628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

制药公司对全科医生(gp)的激励被认为会影响开处方的做法,而这往往不符合患者的利益。利用布尔迪厄的视角,我们考察了支撑巴基斯坦制药公司和普通合伙人之间交流的社会结构条件。对28名全科医生和13名药品销售代表(psr)的定性访谈分析表明,全科医生通过开药来实现药品销售目标,以换取各种奖励。我们认为,这些实践可以通过“领域”的概念来赋予意义——一个社会空间,在这个社会空间中,全科医生、公共服务医师和药剂师以其独特的能力被分层定位,以实现医疗保健提供。然而,制药公司之间的激烈竞争、医疗保健市场上存在不合格的医疗保健提供者以及国家机构缺乏监管等结构性力量,造成了一种环境,使制药公司和普通合伙人也能够利用医疗保健领域作为利润最大化的空间。全科医生认为,收入最大化和满足社会期望标准的努力是鼓励以利润为导向的处方的两个关键因素。我们的结论是,了解医疗保健领域是发展治理实践的重要一步,可以解决利润导向的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The healthcare field as a marketplace: general practitioners, pharmaceutical companies, and profit-led prescribing in Pakistan.

Incentivisation of general practitioners (GPs) by pharmaceutical companies is thought to affect prescribing practices, often not in patients' interest. Using a Bourdieusian lens, we examine the socially structured conditions that underpin exchanges between pharmaceutical companies and GPs in Pakistan. The analysis of qualitative interviews with 28 GPs and 13 pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) shows that GPs, through prescribing medicines, met pharmaceutical sales targets in exchange for various incentives. We argue that these practices can be given meaning through the concept of 'field' - a social space in which GPs, PSRs, and pharmacists were hierarchically positioned, with their unique capacities, to enable healthcare provision. However, structural forces like the intense competition between pharmaceutical companies, the presence of unqualified healthcare providers in the healthcare market, and a lack of regulation by the state institutions produced a context that enabled pharmaceutical companies and GPs to use the healthcare field, also, as space to maximise profits. GPs believed the effort to maximise incomes and meet socially desired standards were two key factors that encouraged profit-led prescribing. We conclude that understanding the healthcare field is an important step toward developing governance practices that can address profit-led prescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信