睡眠对语言和运动巩固的影响:领域一般和特定机制的证据。

IF 3.6 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Dafna Ben-Zion, Ella Gabitov, Anat Prior, Tali Bitan
{"title":"睡眠对语言和运动巩固的影响:领域一般和特定机制的证据。","authors":"Dafna Ben-Zion,&nbsp;Ella Gabitov,&nbsp;Anat Prior,&nbsp;Tali Bitan","doi":"10.1162/nol_a_00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study explores the effects of time and sleep on the consolidation of a novel language learning task containing both item-specific knowledge and the extraction of grammatical regularities. We also compare consolidation effects in language and motor sequence learning tasks, to ask whether consolidation mechanisms are domain general. Young adults learned to apply plural inflections to novel words based on morphophonological rules embedded in the input, and learned to type a motor sequence using a keyboard. Participants were randomly assigned into one of two groups, practicing each task during either the morning or evening hours. Both groups were retested 12 and 24 hours post-training. Performance on frequent trained items in the language task stabilized only following sleep, consistent with a hippocampal mechanism for item-specific learning. However, regularity extraction, indicated by generalization to untrained items in the linguistic task, as well as performance on motor sequence learning, improved 24 hours post-training, irrespective of the timing of sleep. This consolidation process is consistent with a frontostriatal skill-learning mechanism, common across the language and motor domains. This conclusion is further reinforced by cross-domain correlations at the individual level between improvement across 24 hours in the motor task and in the low-frequency trained items in the linguistic task, which involve regularity extraction. Taken together, our results at the group and individual levels suggest that some aspects of consolidation are shared across the motor and language domains, and more specifically, between motor sequence learning and grammar learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158628/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Sleep on Language and Motor Consolidation: Evidence of Domain General and Specific Mechanisms.\",\"authors\":\"Dafna Ben-Zion,&nbsp;Ella Gabitov,&nbsp;Anat Prior,&nbsp;Tali Bitan\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/nol_a_00060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current study explores the effects of time and sleep on the consolidation of a novel language learning task containing both item-specific knowledge and the extraction of grammatical regularities. We also compare consolidation effects in language and motor sequence learning tasks, to ask whether consolidation mechanisms are domain general. Young adults learned to apply plural inflections to novel words based on morphophonological rules embedded in the input, and learned to type a motor sequence using a keyboard. Participants were randomly assigned into one of two groups, practicing each task during either the morning or evening hours. Both groups were retested 12 and 24 hours post-training. Performance on frequent trained items in the language task stabilized only following sleep, consistent with a hippocampal mechanism for item-specific learning. However, regularity extraction, indicated by generalization to untrained items in the linguistic task, as well as performance on motor sequence learning, improved 24 hours post-training, irrespective of the timing of sleep. This consolidation process is consistent with a frontostriatal skill-learning mechanism, common across the language and motor domains. This conclusion is further reinforced by cross-domain correlations at the individual level between improvement across 24 hours in the motor task and in the low-frequency trained items in the linguistic task, which involve regularity extraction. Taken together, our results at the group and individual levels suggest that some aspects of consolidation are shared across the motor and language domains, and more specifically, between motor sequence learning and grammar learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurobiology of Language\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158628/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurobiology of Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究探讨了时间和睡眠对包含特定项目知识和语法规则提取的新语言学习任务巩固的影响。我们还比较了语言和运动序列学习任务中的巩固效应,以了解巩固机制是否具有普遍性。年轻人学会了根据输入中嵌入的词形规则对新单词进行复数屈折,并学会了使用键盘输入一个运动序列。参与者被随机分为两组,在早上或晚上练习每项任务。两组在训练后12小时和24小时再次进行测试。在语言任务中,频繁训练项目的表现只有在睡眠后才稳定下来,这与海马体特定项目学习的机制一致。然而,无论睡眠时间如何,规律性提取(通过对语言任务中未训练项目的概化)以及运动序列学习的表现在训练后24小时均有所改善。这种巩固过程与额纹状体技能学习机制是一致的,在语言和运动领域都很常见。在个体水平上,运动任务和语言任务中涉及规则提取的低频训练项目在24小时内的改善之间的跨域相关性进一步强化了这一结论。综上所述,我们在群体和个人层面上的结果表明,在运动和语言领域,更具体地说,在运动序列学习和语法学习之间,巩固的某些方面是共享的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of Sleep on Language and Motor Consolidation: Evidence of Domain General and Specific Mechanisms.

Effects of Sleep on Language and Motor Consolidation: Evidence of Domain General and Specific Mechanisms.

Effects of Sleep on Language and Motor Consolidation: Evidence of Domain General and Specific Mechanisms.

Effects of Sleep on Language and Motor Consolidation: Evidence of Domain General and Specific Mechanisms.

The current study explores the effects of time and sleep on the consolidation of a novel language learning task containing both item-specific knowledge and the extraction of grammatical regularities. We also compare consolidation effects in language and motor sequence learning tasks, to ask whether consolidation mechanisms are domain general. Young adults learned to apply plural inflections to novel words based on morphophonological rules embedded in the input, and learned to type a motor sequence using a keyboard. Participants were randomly assigned into one of two groups, practicing each task during either the morning or evening hours. Both groups were retested 12 and 24 hours post-training. Performance on frequent trained items in the language task stabilized only following sleep, consistent with a hippocampal mechanism for item-specific learning. However, regularity extraction, indicated by generalization to untrained items in the linguistic task, as well as performance on motor sequence learning, improved 24 hours post-training, irrespective of the timing of sleep. This consolidation process is consistent with a frontostriatal skill-learning mechanism, common across the language and motor domains. This conclusion is further reinforced by cross-domain correlations at the individual level between improvement across 24 hours in the motor task and in the low-frequency trained items in the linguistic task, which involve regularity extraction. Taken together, our results at the group and individual levels suggest that some aspects of consolidation are shared across the motor and language domains, and more specifically, between motor sequence learning and grammar learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Language
Neurobiology of Language Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信