当前治疗方案对难治性慢性咳嗽的止咳效果:我们在一项回顾性队列研究中的真实世界经验。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Mengru Zhang, Alyn H Morice, Fengli Si, Li Zhang, Qiang Chen, Shengyuan Wang, Yiqing Zhu, Xianghuai Xu, Li Yu, Zhongmin Qiu
{"title":"当前治疗方案对难治性慢性咳嗽的止咳效果:我们在一项回顾性队列研究中的真实世界经验。","authors":"Mengru Zhang,&nbsp;Alyn H Morice,&nbsp;Fengli Si,&nbsp;Li Zhang,&nbsp;Qiang Chen,&nbsp;Shengyuan Wang,&nbsp;Yiqing Zhu,&nbsp;Xianghuai Xu,&nbsp;Li Yu,&nbsp;Zhongmin Qiu","doi":"10.1177/17534666231167716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of refractory chronic cough (RCC) is a great challenge. Neuromodulators have long been used for RCC with imperfect efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We summarized the outcomes of the current treatments used at our specialist cough clinic, which provides a guideline-led service and real-world experience for the future management of RCC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive RCC patients (the first clinic visit between January 2016 and May 2021) were included into this observational cohort study. Medical records in the Chronic Cough Clinical Research Database were fully reviewed using uniform criteria. The included subjects were followed-up for at least 6 months after the final clinic visit via instant messages with the link to self-scaled cough-associated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 369 RCC patients were analysed with a median age of 46.6 years and a cough duration of 24.0 months. A total of 10 different treatments were offered. However, 96.2% of patients had been prescribed at least one neuromodulator. One-third of patients had alternative treatments prescribed given the poor response to the initial therapy and 71.3% favourably responded to at least one of the treatments. Gabapentin, deanxit, and baclofen had comparable therapeutic efficacy (56.0%, 56.0%, and 62.5% respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.88) and overall incidences of adverse effects (28.3%, 22.0%, and 32.3% respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.76). However, 19.1 (7.7-41.8) months after the last clinic visit, 65.0% reported improvement (24.9%) or control of their cough (40.1%); 3.8% reported a spontaneous remission and 31.2% still had a severe cough. Both HARQ (<i>n</i> = 97; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and LCQ (<i>n</i> = 58; <i>p</i> < 0.001) demonstrated marked improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trying different neuromodulators is a pragmatic strategy for RCC, which helped around two-thirds of patients. Relapse is common on withdrawal or reduction of dosage. Novel medication for RCC is an urgent clinical need.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This is the first report that fully represented a guideline-led treatment protocol for refractory chronic cough (RCC) based on a large series of patients, which evaluated the short- and long-term effects of the currently available treatments for RCC. We found that the therapeutic trial of different neuromodulators is a pragmatic strategy, which helped around two-thirds of patients. Gabapentin, deanxit (flupentixol/melitracen), and baclofen had similar therapeutic outcomes. This study may offer real-world experience for the future management of RCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/19/10.1177_17534666231167716.PMC10126594.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antitussive efficacy of the current treatment protocol for refractory chronic cough: our real-world experience in a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Mengru Zhang,&nbsp;Alyn H Morice,&nbsp;Fengli Si,&nbsp;Li Zhang,&nbsp;Qiang Chen,&nbsp;Shengyuan Wang,&nbsp;Yiqing Zhu,&nbsp;Xianghuai Xu,&nbsp;Li Yu,&nbsp;Zhongmin Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17534666231167716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of refractory chronic cough (RCC) is a great challenge. Neuromodulators have long been used for RCC with imperfect efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We summarized the outcomes of the current treatments used at our specialist cough clinic, which provides a guideline-led service and real-world experience for the future management of RCC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive RCC patients (the first clinic visit between January 2016 and May 2021) were included into this observational cohort study. Medical records in the Chronic Cough Clinical Research Database were fully reviewed using uniform criteria. The included subjects were followed-up for at least 6 months after the final clinic visit via instant messages with the link to self-scaled cough-associated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 369 RCC patients were analysed with a median age of 46.6 years and a cough duration of 24.0 months. A total of 10 different treatments were offered. However, 96.2% of patients had been prescribed at least one neuromodulator. One-third of patients had alternative treatments prescribed given the poor response to the initial therapy and 71.3% favourably responded to at least one of the treatments. Gabapentin, deanxit, and baclofen had comparable therapeutic efficacy (56.0%, 56.0%, and 62.5% respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.88) and overall incidences of adverse effects (28.3%, 22.0%, and 32.3% respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.76). However, 19.1 (7.7-41.8) months after the last clinic visit, 65.0% reported improvement (24.9%) or control of their cough (40.1%); 3.8% reported a spontaneous remission and 31.2% still had a severe cough. Both HARQ (<i>n</i> = 97; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and LCQ (<i>n</i> = 58; <i>p</i> < 0.001) demonstrated marked improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trying different neuromodulators is a pragmatic strategy for RCC, which helped around two-thirds of patients. Relapse is common on withdrawal or reduction of dosage. Novel medication for RCC is an urgent clinical need.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This is the first report that fully represented a guideline-led treatment protocol for refractory chronic cough (RCC) based on a large series of patients, which evaluated the short- and long-term effects of the currently available treatments for RCC. We found that the therapeutic trial of different neuromodulators is a pragmatic strategy, which helped around two-thirds of patients. Gabapentin, deanxit (flupentixol/melitracen), and baclofen had similar therapeutic outcomes. This study may offer real-world experience for the future management of RCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/19/10.1177_17534666231167716.PMC10126594.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666231167716\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666231167716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:难治性慢性咳嗽(RCC)的治疗是一个巨大的挑战。神经调节剂长期用于RCC,但疗效不理想。目的:我们总结了目前在我们专科咳嗽诊所使用的治疗方法的结果,为未来的RCC治疗提供指导和现实经验。设计:这是一项单中心回顾性观察队列研究。方法:连续的RCC患者(首次就诊于2016年1月至2021年5月)被纳入这项观察性队列研究。使用统一的标准对慢性咳嗽临床研究数据库中的医疗记录进行全面审查。在最后一次诊所访问后,通过带有自量表咳嗽相关问卷链接的即时消息对纳入的受试者进行了至少6个月的随访。结果:总体而言,分析了369例RCC患者,中位年龄46.6岁,咳嗽持续时间24.0个月。总共提供10种不同的治疗方法。然而,96.2%的患者至少服用过一种神经调节剂。三分之一的患者由于对初始治疗反应不佳而接受了替代治疗,71.3%的患者对至少一种治疗反应良好。加巴喷丁、迪安西特和巴氯芬的疗效相当(分别为56.0%、56.0%和62.5%);P = 0.88),总不良反应发生率分别为28.3%、22.0%和32.3%;p = 0.76)。然而,在最后一次就诊19.1(7.7 ~ 41.8)个月后,65.0%的患者咳嗽改善(24.9%)或控制(40.1%);3.8%报告自发缓解,31.2%仍有严重咳嗽。HARQ (n = 97;p n = 58;结论:尝试不同的神经调节剂是治疗RCC的一种实用策略,它帮助了大约三分之二的患者。停药或减量后复发是常见的。治疗肾细胞癌的新药物是迫切的临床需求。简单的语言总结:这是第一份完全代表以指南为主导的难治性慢性咳嗽(RCC)治疗方案的报告,该方案基于大量患者,评估了目前可用的RCC治疗方法的短期和长期效果。我们发现不同神经调节剂的治疗试验是一种实用的策略,它帮助了大约三分之二的患者。加巴喷丁、迪安西特(氟哌噻索/美利曲辛)和巴氯芬的治疗效果相似。本研究可为未来碾压细胞癌的治疗提供现实经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Antitussive efficacy of the current treatment protocol for refractory chronic cough: our real-world experience in a retrospective cohort study.

Antitussive efficacy of the current treatment protocol for refractory chronic cough: our real-world experience in a retrospective cohort study.

Antitussive efficacy of the current treatment protocol for refractory chronic cough: our real-world experience in a retrospective cohort study.

Antitussive efficacy of the current treatment protocol for refractory chronic cough: our real-world experience in a retrospective cohort study.

Background: The management of refractory chronic cough (RCC) is a great challenge. Neuromodulators have long been used for RCC with imperfect efficacy.

Objectives: We summarized the outcomes of the current treatments used at our specialist cough clinic, which provides a guideline-led service and real-world experience for the future management of RCC.

Design: This is a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.

Methods: Consecutive RCC patients (the first clinic visit between January 2016 and May 2021) were included into this observational cohort study. Medical records in the Chronic Cough Clinical Research Database were fully reviewed using uniform criteria. The included subjects were followed-up for at least 6 months after the final clinic visit via instant messages with the link to self-scaled cough-associated questionnaires.

Results: Overall, 369 RCC patients were analysed with a median age of 46.6 years and a cough duration of 24.0 months. A total of 10 different treatments were offered. However, 96.2% of patients had been prescribed at least one neuromodulator. One-third of patients had alternative treatments prescribed given the poor response to the initial therapy and 71.3% favourably responded to at least one of the treatments. Gabapentin, deanxit, and baclofen had comparable therapeutic efficacy (56.0%, 56.0%, and 62.5% respectively; p = 0.88) and overall incidences of adverse effects (28.3%, 22.0%, and 32.3% respectively; p = 0.76). However, 19.1 (7.7-41.8) months after the last clinic visit, 65.0% reported improvement (24.9%) or control of their cough (40.1%); 3.8% reported a spontaneous remission and 31.2% still had a severe cough. Both HARQ (n = 97; p < 0.001) and LCQ (n = 58; p < 0.001) demonstrated marked improvement.

Conclusion: Trying different neuromodulators is a pragmatic strategy for RCC, which helped around two-thirds of patients. Relapse is common on withdrawal or reduction of dosage. Novel medication for RCC is an urgent clinical need.

Plain language summary: This is the first report that fully represented a guideline-led treatment protocol for refractory chronic cough (RCC) based on a large series of patients, which evaluated the short- and long-term effects of the currently available treatments for RCC. We found that the therapeutic trial of different neuromodulators is a pragmatic strategy, which helped around two-thirds of patients. Gabapentin, deanxit (flupentixol/melitracen), and baclofen had similar therapeutic outcomes. This study may offer real-world experience for the future management of RCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信