将家庭照顾者纳入卫生保健团队的概念框架:范围审查。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Minakshi Raj, Amber L Stephenson, Matthew J DePuccio, Erin E Sullivan, Will Tarver, Bram Fleuren, Samuel C Thomas, Ann Scheck McAlearney
{"title":"将家庭照顾者纳入卫生保健团队的概念框架:范围审查。","authors":"Minakshi Raj,&nbsp;Amber L Stephenson,&nbsp;Matthew J DePuccio,&nbsp;Erin E Sullivan,&nbsp;Will Tarver,&nbsp;Bram Fleuren,&nbsp;Samuel C Thomas,&nbsp;Ann Scheck McAlearney","doi":"10.1177/10775587221118435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 80% of family care partners of older adults are responsible for coordinating care between and among providers; yet, their inclusion in the health care delivery process lacks recognition, coordination, and standardization. Despite efforts to include care partners (e.g., through informal or formal proxy access to their care recipient's patient portal), policies and procedures around care partner inclusion are complex and inconsistently implemented. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published from 2015 to 2021 and reviewed a final sample of 45 U.S.-based studies. Few articles specifically examine the inclusion of care partners in health care teams; those that do, do not define or measure care partner inclusion in a standardized way. Efforts to consider care partners as \"partners\" rather than \"visitors\" require further consideration of how to build health care teams inclusive of care partners. Incentives for health care organizations and providers to practice inclusive team-building may be required.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":"80 2","pages":"131-144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual Framework for Integrating Family Caregivers Into the Health Care Team: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Minakshi Raj,&nbsp;Amber L Stephenson,&nbsp;Matthew J DePuccio,&nbsp;Erin E Sullivan,&nbsp;Will Tarver,&nbsp;Bram Fleuren,&nbsp;Samuel C Thomas,&nbsp;Ann Scheck McAlearney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10775587221118435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>More than 80% of family care partners of older adults are responsible for coordinating care between and among providers; yet, their inclusion in the health care delivery process lacks recognition, coordination, and standardization. Despite efforts to include care partners (e.g., through informal or formal proxy access to their care recipient's patient portal), policies and procedures around care partner inclusion are complex and inconsistently implemented. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published from 2015 to 2021 and reviewed a final sample of 45 U.S.-based studies. Few articles specifically examine the inclusion of care partners in health care teams; those that do, do not define or measure care partner inclusion in a standardized way. Efforts to consider care partners as \\\"partners\\\" rather than \\\"visitors\\\" require further consideration of how to build health care teams inclusive of care partners. Incentives for health care organizations and providers to practice inclusive team-building may be required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"volume\":\"80 2\",\"pages\":\"131-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587221118435\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587221118435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

80%以上的老年人家庭护理伙伴负责协调提供者之间的护理;然而,将她们纳入卫生保健服务过程缺乏承认、协调和标准化。尽管努力将护理伙伴包括在内(例如,通过非正式或正式的代理访问其护理对象的患者门户网站),但围绕纳入护理伙伴的政策和程序是复杂的,并且执行不一致。我们对2015年至2021年发表的同行评议文章进行了范围审查,并审查了45项美国研究的最终样本。很少有文章专门研究将护理伙伴纳入卫生保健团队;那些这样做的,没有以标准化的方式定义或衡量护理伙伴纳入。将护理伙伴视为"伙伴"而不是"访客"的努力需要进一步考虑如何建立包括护理伙伴在内的保健团队。可能需要鼓励卫生保健组织和提供者实践包容性团队建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptual Framework for Integrating Family Caregivers Into the Health Care Team: A Scoping Review.

More than 80% of family care partners of older adults are responsible for coordinating care between and among providers; yet, their inclusion in the health care delivery process lacks recognition, coordination, and standardization. Despite efforts to include care partners (e.g., through informal or formal proxy access to their care recipient's patient portal), policies and procedures around care partner inclusion are complex and inconsistently implemented. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published from 2015 to 2021 and reviewed a final sample of 45 U.S.-based studies. Few articles specifically examine the inclusion of care partners in health care teams; those that do, do not define or measure care partner inclusion in a standardized way. Efforts to consider care partners as "partners" rather than "visitors" require further consideration of how to build health care teams inclusive of care partners. Incentives for health care organizations and providers to practice inclusive team-building may be required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信