术中反馈:外科学员观点的调查。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mohammed Gadoora Fadelalla, Sabreen Elbakri, Michael Poon
{"title":"术中反馈:外科学员观点的调查。","authors":"Mohammed Gadoora Fadelalla,&nbsp;Sabreen Elbakri,&nbsp;Michael Poon","doi":"10.1177/00369330231163375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative feedback can be associated with improved surgical performance. Quality feedback can reduce the time required by trainees to achieve proficiency in psychomotor skills. Operative training time has become increasingly limited, and it has become imperative to use surgical training time effectively.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this survey, we assessed trainees' perspectives of intraoperative feedback. We included several aspects of feedback including its occurrence, quality, and potential barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All surgical trainees in a single centre were invited to complete an electronic questionnaire. Participants were anonymised. We summarised data using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most trainees (85%) reported they had the opportunity to share their training goals with trainers. Just under three-quarters of trainees felt they always or sometimes got timely feedback. Only half of the trainees were signposted to feedback and 23% felt feedback was not part of their department's culture. Half of the trainees did not always feel comfortable asking for feedback from their trainers stating their reasons as fear of criticism, lack of time and competing clinical commitments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no denying the importance of feedback on operative performance, however, this survey shows that many of the pillars of quality feedback are poorly adhered to.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 2","pages":"58-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative feedback: A survey of surgical trainees' perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Gadoora Fadelalla,&nbsp;Sabreen Elbakri,&nbsp;Michael Poon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00369330231163375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative feedback can be associated with improved surgical performance. Quality feedback can reduce the time required by trainees to achieve proficiency in psychomotor skills. Operative training time has become increasingly limited, and it has become imperative to use surgical training time effectively.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this survey, we assessed trainees' perspectives of intraoperative feedback. We included several aspects of feedback including its occurrence, quality, and potential barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All surgical trainees in a single centre were invited to complete an electronic questionnaire. Participants were anonymised. We summarised data using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most trainees (85%) reported they had the opportunity to share their training goals with trainers. Just under three-quarters of trainees felt they always or sometimes got timely feedback. Only half of the trainees were signposted to feedback and 23% felt feedback was not part of their department's culture. Half of the trainees did not always feel comfortable asking for feedback from their trainers stating their reasons as fear of criticism, lack of time and competing clinical commitments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no denying the importance of feedback on operative performance, however, this survey shows that many of the pillars of quality feedback are poorly adhered to.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scottish Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"68 2\",\"pages\":\"58-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scottish Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330231163375\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330231163375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

术中反馈可改善手术效果。高质量的反馈可以减少学员熟练掌握精神运动技能所需的时间。手术培训时间越来越有限,有效利用手术培训时间已势在必行。目的:在本调查中,我们评估受训者术中反馈的观点。我们包含了反馈的几个方面,包括它的发生、质量和潜在的障碍。方法:请同一中心的所有外科培训生填写一份电子问卷。参与者是匿名的。我们用描述性统计对数据进行汇总。结果:大多数学员(85%)表示他们有机会与培训师分享他们的培训目标。不到四分之三的受训者认为他们总是或有时得到及时的反馈。只有一半的受训者得到了反馈,23%的受训者认为反馈不是他们部门文化的一部分。一半的受训者并不总是觉得从他们的培训师那里获得反馈很舒服,他们说他们的原因是害怕批评、缺乏时间和竞争性的临床承诺。结论:无可否认,反馈对手术表现的重要性,然而,本调查显示,许多质量反馈的支柱没有得到很好的遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative feedback: A survey of surgical trainees' perspective.

Introduction: Intraoperative feedback can be associated with improved surgical performance. Quality feedback can reduce the time required by trainees to achieve proficiency in psychomotor skills. Operative training time has become increasingly limited, and it has become imperative to use surgical training time effectively.

Aim: In this survey, we assessed trainees' perspectives of intraoperative feedback. We included several aspects of feedback including its occurrence, quality, and potential barriers.

Methods: All surgical trainees in a single centre were invited to complete an electronic questionnaire. Participants were anonymised. We summarised data using descriptive statistics.

Results: Most trainees (85%) reported they had the opportunity to share their training goals with trainers. Just under three-quarters of trainees felt they always or sometimes got timely feedback. Only half of the trainees were signposted to feedback and 23% felt feedback was not part of their department's culture. Half of the trainees did not always feel comfortable asking for feedback from their trainers stating their reasons as fear of criticism, lack of time and competing clinical commitments.

Conclusion: There is no denying the importance of feedback on operative performance, however, this survey shows that many of the pillars of quality feedback are poorly adhered to.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信