等等!这是什么意思?从OR/MS的角度消除医疗保健延迟的模糊性。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Maria Van Zyl-Cillié, Derya Demirtas, Erwin Hans
{"title":"等等!这是什么意思?从OR/MS的角度消除医疗保健延迟的模糊性。","authors":"Maria Van Zyl-Cillié,&nbsp;Derya Demirtas,&nbsp;Erwin Hans","doi":"10.1080/20476965.2021.2018362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Waiting time in healthcare is a significant problem that occurs across the world and often has catastrophic effects. There are various terms used for waiting time (\"sojourn\", \"throughput\" etc.) and there is no consensus on how these terms are defined. Ambiguous definitions of waiting time make it difficult to compare and measure the problems related to waiting times and delays in healthcare. We present a systematic search and review of the Operations Research and Management Science (ORMS) literature on delays in healthcare services. We search for articles from 2004 to 2019 and base our search strategy on a well-known healthcare planning and control decision taxonomy. An important step towards reducing the ambiguity in the definitions is to distinguish between <i>access time</i> and <i>waiting time</i>. We provide clear definitions and examples of access time and waiting time, and we classify our search results according to three categories: article type, healthcare service investigated and ORMS technique used to solve the delay problem. We find that half of the ORMS research on the waiting and access time problem is done on Ambulatory Care services. We provide tables for each healthcare service that highlight key definitions, the techniques that are used most often and the healthcare environment where the research is done. This research highlights the significant ORMS research that is done on access and waiting time in healthcare as well as the remaining research opportunities. Moreover, it provides a common language for the ORMS community to solve critical waiting time issues in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/a5/THSS_12_2018362.PMC10013540.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wait!What does that mean?: Eliminating ambiguity of delays in healthcare from an OR/MS perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Van Zyl-Cillié,&nbsp;Derya Demirtas,&nbsp;Erwin Hans\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20476965.2021.2018362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Waiting time in healthcare is a significant problem that occurs across the world and often has catastrophic effects. There are various terms used for waiting time (\\\"sojourn\\\", \\\"throughput\\\" etc.) and there is no consensus on how these terms are defined. Ambiguous definitions of waiting time make it difficult to compare and measure the problems related to waiting times and delays in healthcare. We present a systematic search and review of the Operations Research and Management Science (ORMS) literature on delays in healthcare services. We search for articles from 2004 to 2019 and base our search strategy on a well-known healthcare planning and control decision taxonomy. An important step towards reducing the ambiguity in the definitions is to distinguish between <i>access time</i> and <i>waiting time</i>. We provide clear definitions and examples of access time and waiting time, and we classify our search results according to three categories: article type, healthcare service investigated and ORMS technique used to solve the delay problem. We find that half of the ORMS research on the waiting and access time problem is done on Ambulatory Care services. We provide tables for each healthcare service that highlight key definitions, the techniques that are used most often and the healthcare environment where the research is done. This research highlights the significant ORMS research that is done on access and waiting time in healthcare as well as the remaining research opportunities. Moreover, it provides a common language for the ORMS community to solve critical waiting time issues in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/a5/THSS_12_2018362.PMC10013540.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2021.2018362\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2021.2018362","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

医疗保健的等待时间是世界各地都存在的一个重要问题,往往会产生灾难性的影响。等待时间有各种各样的术语(“逗留时间”、“吞吐量”等),如何定义这些术语尚无共识。等待时间的模糊定义使得比较和衡量与等待时间和医疗保健延误相关的问题变得困难。我们提出了一个系统的搜索和回顾运筹学和管理科学(ORMS)文献延迟医疗保健服务。我们搜索从2004年到2019年的文章,并将我们的搜索策略基于一个著名的医疗保健计划和控制决策分类法。减少定义歧义的一个重要步骤是区分访问时间和等待时间。我们提供了访问时间和等待时间的明确定义和示例,并根据三类对搜索结果进行分类:文章类型、调查的医疗保健服务和用于解决延迟问题的ORMS技术。我们发现有一半的ORMS研究是针对门诊服务的等待和访问时间问题进行的。我们为每个医疗保健服务提供了表格,其中突出显示了关键定义、最常用的技术以及进行研究的医疗保健环境。这项研究强调了在医疗保健中获取和等待时间以及剩余的研究机会方面所做的重要ORMS研究。此外,它为ORMS社区提供了一种通用语言,以解决医疗保健中的关键等待时间问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Wait!What does that mean?: Eliminating ambiguity of delays in healthcare from an OR/MS perspective.

Wait!What does that mean?: Eliminating ambiguity of delays in healthcare from an OR/MS perspective.

Wait!What does that mean?: Eliminating ambiguity of delays in healthcare from an OR/MS perspective.

Wait!What does that mean?: Eliminating ambiguity of delays in healthcare from an OR/MS perspective.

Waiting time in healthcare is a significant problem that occurs across the world and often has catastrophic effects. There are various terms used for waiting time ("sojourn", "throughput" etc.) and there is no consensus on how these terms are defined. Ambiguous definitions of waiting time make it difficult to compare and measure the problems related to waiting times and delays in healthcare. We present a systematic search and review of the Operations Research and Management Science (ORMS) literature on delays in healthcare services. We search for articles from 2004 to 2019 and base our search strategy on a well-known healthcare planning and control decision taxonomy. An important step towards reducing the ambiguity in the definitions is to distinguish between access time and waiting time. We provide clear definitions and examples of access time and waiting time, and we classify our search results according to three categories: article type, healthcare service investigated and ORMS technique used to solve the delay problem. We find that half of the ORMS research on the waiting and access time problem is done on Ambulatory Care services. We provide tables for each healthcare service that highlight key definitions, the techniques that are used most often and the healthcare environment where the research is done. This research highlights the significant ORMS research that is done on access and waiting time in healthcare as well as the remaining research opportunities. Moreover, it provides a common language for the ORMS community to solve critical waiting time issues in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信