Kilian Hasselhorn, Charlotte Ottenstein, Tanja Lischetzke
{"title":"用多水平潜在类分析模拟门诊评估研究中的粗心反应:粗心反应的影响因素。","authors":"Kilian Hasselhorn, Charlotte Ottenstein, Tanja Lischetzke","doi":"10.1037/met0000580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the number of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA) has been increasing across diverse fields of research, so has the necessity to identify potential threats to AA data quality such as careless responding. To date, careless responding has primarily been studied in cross-sectional surveys. The goal of the present research was to identify latent profiles of momentary careless responding on the occasion level and latent classes of individuals (who differ in the distribution of careless responding profiles across occasions) on the person level using multilevel latent class analysis (ML-LCA). We discuss which of the previously proposed indices seem promising for investigating careless responding in AA studies, and we show how ML-LCA can be applied to model careless responding in intensive longitudinal data. We used data from an AA study in which the sampling frequency (3 vs. 9 occasions per day, 7 days, <i>n</i> = 310 participants) was experimentally manipulated. We tested the effect of sampling frequency on careless responding using multigroup ML-LCA and investigated situational and respondent-level covariates. The results showed that four Level 1 profiles (\"careful,\" \"slow,\" and two types of \"careless\" responding) and four Level 2 classes (\"careful,\" \"frequently careless,\" and two types of \"infrequently careless\" respondents) could be identified. Sampling frequency did not have an effect on careless responding. On the person (but not the occasion) level, motivational variables were associated with careless responding. We hope that researchers might find the application of an ML-LCA approach useful to shed more light on factors influencing careless responding in AA studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":" ","pages":"374-392"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling careless responding in ambulatory assessment studies using multilevel latent class analysis: Factors influencing careless responding.\",\"authors\":\"Kilian Hasselhorn, Charlotte Ottenstein, Tanja Lischetzke\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/met0000580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As the number of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA) has been increasing across diverse fields of research, so has the necessity to identify potential threats to AA data quality such as careless responding. To date, careless responding has primarily been studied in cross-sectional surveys. The goal of the present research was to identify latent profiles of momentary careless responding on the occasion level and latent classes of individuals (who differ in the distribution of careless responding profiles across occasions) on the person level using multilevel latent class analysis (ML-LCA). We discuss which of the previously proposed indices seem promising for investigating careless responding in AA studies, and we show how ML-LCA can be applied to model careless responding in intensive longitudinal data. We used data from an AA study in which the sampling frequency (3 vs. 9 occasions per day, 7 days, <i>n</i> = 310 participants) was experimentally manipulated. We tested the effect of sampling frequency on careless responding using multigroup ML-LCA and investigated situational and respondent-level covariates. The results showed that four Level 1 profiles (\\\"careful,\\\" \\\"slow,\\\" and two types of \\\"careless\\\" responding) and four Level 2 classes (\\\"careful,\\\" \\\"frequently careless,\\\" and two types of \\\"infrequently careless\\\" respondents) could be identified. Sampling frequency did not have an effect on careless responding. On the person (but not the occasion) level, motivational variables were associated with careless responding. We hope that researchers might find the application of an ML-LCA approach useful to shed more light on factors influencing careless responding in AA studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"374-392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000580\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000580","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着使用动态评估(AA)的研究数量在不同的研究领域不断增加,因此有必要识别对AA数据质量的潜在威胁,如粗心的响应。迄今为止,漫不经心的回答主要是在横断面调查中研究的。本研究的目的是利用多层次潜在类分析(ML-LCA)确定瞬时粗心反应在场合水平上的潜在特征和个体在个人水平上的潜在类别(不同场合粗心反应特征的分布不同)。我们讨论了先前提出的哪些指标似乎有希望调查AA研究中的粗心反应,并展示了如何将ML-LCA应用于密集纵向数据中的粗心反应模型。我们使用了来自AA研究的数据,其中采样频率(每天3次vs. 9次,7天,n = 310名参与者)被实验操纵。我们使用多组ML-LCA测试了采样频率对粗心回答的影响,并调查了情境和被调查者水平的协变量。结果表明,可以识别出四个1级配置文件(“细心”,“缓慢”和两种类型的“粗心”响应)和四个2级类别(“细心”,“经常粗心”和两种类型的“不经常粗心”的受访者)。采样频率对粗心应答没有影响。在个人(而不是场合)层面上,动机变量与粗心的回应有关。我们希望研究人员可以发现ML-LCA方法的应用有助于揭示AA研究中影响粗心反应的因素。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Modeling careless responding in ambulatory assessment studies using multilevel latent class analysis: Factors influencing careless responding.
As the number of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA) has been increasing across diverse fields of research, so has the necessity to identify potential threats to AA data quality such as careless responding. To date, careless responding has primarily been studied in cross-sectional surveys. The goal of the present research was to identify latent profiles of momentary careless responding on the occasion level and latent classes of individuals (who differ in the distribution of careless responding profiles across occasions) on the person level using multilevel latent class analysis (ML-LCA). We discuss which of the previously proposed indices seem promising for investigating careless responding in AA studies, and we show how ML-LCA can be applied to model careless responding in intensive longitudinal data. We used data from an AA study in which the sampling frequency (3 vs. 9 occasions per day, 7 days, n = 310 participants) was experimentally manipulated. We tested the effect of sampling frequency on careless responding using multigroup ML-LCA and investigated situational and respondent-level covariates. The results showed that four Level 1 profiles ("careful," "slow," and two types of "careless" responding) and four Level 2 classes ("careful," "frequently careless," and two types of "infrequently careless" respondents) could be identified. Sampling frequency did not have an effect on careless responding. On the person (but not the occasion) level, motivational variables were associated with careless responding. We hope that researchers might find the application of an ML-LCA approach useful to shed more light on factors influencing careless responding in AA studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.